Deep research is hard when sources disagree or lack context. This skill guides Claude, Codex, and Claude Code to synthesize sources, compare viewpoints, and produce cited research summaries.
Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.
Agent request
Review the Skillstore skill "deep-research" from https://skillstore.io/skills/shubhamsaboo-deep-research.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/shubhamsaboo-deep-research/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.
Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.
Agent-readable resources
Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.
All four static findings are false positives caused by markdown formatting or health example prose in SKILL.md. No prompt injection, command execution intent, reconnaissance intent, or data exfiltration intent was found.
Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.
Compare official reports, expert commentary, and news coverage to summarize risks, tradeoffs, and open questions.
Analyze Market Topics
Turn scattered source material into a structured brief with trends, competing views, and research gaps.
Draft Literature Summaries
Organize academic and secondary sources into key findings, citations, and areas for further investigation.
Try These Prompts
Research a Topic
Research [topic]. Clarify the main question, identify key aspects, and summarize the strongest findings with citations.
Compare Viewpoints
Research [topic] from multiple perspectives. Separate areas of consensus, areas of debate, and claims that need stronger evidence.
Evaluate Sources
Review these sources about [topic]. Rank their credibility, note publication dates, identify bias risks, and explain which claims each source supports.
Build an Evidence Brief
Create an evidence brief on [topic] for [audience]. Include an executive summary, key findings, detailed analysis, citations, limitations, and further research needs.
Best Practices
State the research question, audience, and desired depth before starting.
Ask for source credibility notes when the topic affects decisions.
Verify citations and dates before publishing or sharing the output.
Avoid
Do not ask for a conclusion before the evidence is reviewed.
Do not treat generated citations as verified without checking them.
Do not use this skill as professional advice for regulated decisions.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill produce?
It produces structured research summaries with key findings, detailed analysis, citations, debate areas, and research gaps.
Does it browse the web by itself?
No. It needs the host agent to provide browsing, retrieval, or source material.
Can it evaluate source quality?
Yes. It prompts the agent to consider credibility, publication dates, source type, and uncertainty.
Is it useful for academic work?
Yes, but users should verify all citations and follow their institution rules.
Can it compare conflicting viewpoints?
Yes. It explicitly separates consensus, debate, uncertainty, and gaps.
Which tools can use it?
The report lists compatibility with Claude, Codex, and Claude Code.