Skills deep-research
๐Ÿ“ฆ

deep-research

Content revision r2 Safe โš™๏ธ External commands๐ŸŒ Network access๐Ÿ”‘ Env variables

Run Structured Deep Research with Gemini

Complex research can require many searches, source checks, and synthesis steps. This skill documents a Gemini workflow for starting, monitoring, continuing, and formatting research tasks.

Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)
๐Ÿฅ‰ 78 Bronze

Install with my Agent

Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.

Agent request
Review the Skillstore skill "deep-research" from https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-deep-research.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/sickn33-deep-research/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.

Agent-readable resources

Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.

Test it

Using "deep-research". Research the history of Kubernetes.

Expected outcome:

  • Executive summary of major development phases and current significance.
  • Timeline covering origins, releases, governance changes, and ecosystem milestones.
  • Cited source list with open questions and confidence notes.

Using "deep-research". Compare Django and FastAPI for a new internal service.

Expected outcome:

  • Side-by-side comparison of architecture, performance, ecosystem, maintenance, and team fit.
  • Evidence-backed tradeoffs for the stated deployment context.
  • Recommendation with assumptions, risks, and verification steps.

Using "deep-research". Analyze the European electric vehicle battery market.

Expected outcome:

  • Market overview with scope, historical context, and cited estimates.
  • Competitor, supply-chain, policy, and technology analysis.
  • Forecast scenarios with uncertainty and disputed evidence clearly identified.

Security Audit

Safe
v5 โ€ข 7/23/2026 Open versioned report

All 30 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown backticks, code fences, setup links, API-key placeholders, and exit-code prose. The package contains only SKILL.md and no executable implementation, so no command execution, secret access, reconnaissance, or exfiltration behavior is present. No prompt injection or net-new semantic security issue was found.

1
Files scanned
121
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.
Audited by: codex View Audit History โ†’
Share & cite this report

Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.

Open versioned report
Security Assessment

Copy report link

https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-deep-research/audits/5?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/sickn33-deep-research/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-deep-research?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-deep-research?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/sickn33-deep-research/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Embed card

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/sickn33-deep-research.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Academic citations (APA ยท BibTeX ยท CFF)

APA citation

sickn33. (2026). deep-research security audit report (audit version 5) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-deep-research/audits/5

BibTeX citation

@techreport{sickn33-sickn33-deep-research-2026, author = {sickn33}, title = {deep-research security audit report (audit version 5)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {5}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-deep-research/audits/5}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "deep-research security audit report (audit version 5)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "sickn33" date-released: "2026-07-23" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-deep-research/audits/5" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:sickn33-deep-research:audit:5" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Compare variants

5 installable variants

Each author remains a separate installable skill. The recommended variant is ranked by Skillstore evidence.

Why this variant is first

Highest Skillstore Score
shubhamsaboo Recommended

shubhamsaboo-deep-research

Skillstore Score 80
Evidence Confidence Medium
Skillstore usage 14
Updated

2026-08-21

sickn33 Current

sickn33-deep-research

Skillstore Score 78
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 21
Updated

2026-08-21

199-biotechnologies-deep-research

Skillstore Score 69
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 158
Updated

2026-08-21

21pounder-deep-research

Skillstore Score 38
Evidence Confidence Medium
Skillstore usage 23
Updated

2026-08-21

lumacoder-deep-research

Skillstore Score 38
Evidence Confidence Medium
Skillstore usage 11
Updated

2026-08-21

Skillstore Score

Why this score Evidence Confidence: High
55
Architecture
85
Maintainability
87
Content
69
Community
83
Spec Compliance

What You Can Build

Assess a market

Map competitors, market growth, regulation, and recent forecasts before planning a market entry.

Review academic evidence

Build a cited literature overview, compare findings, and identify unresolved questions before deeper source review.

Compare technologies

Compare technologies using evidence about capabilities, adoption, maintenance, costs, and operational risks.

Try These Prompts

Research a topic
Research [topic]. Provide a concise overview, key dates, major sources, and unresolved questions. Cite every factual claim.
Compare two options
Compare [option A] and [option B] for [context]. Evaluate cost, capabilities, risks, and adoption evidence. Finish with a recommendation.
Analyze a market
Analyze [market] in [region] from [start year] to [end year]. Cover size, growth, competitors, regulation, and cited forecasts.
Test a complex decision
Investigate [decision] using primary and recent sources. Separate evidence from inference, challenge assumptions, identify conflicts, and present confidence-rated conclusions.

Best Practices

  • Define the topic, geography, time range, audience, and decision before starting research.
  • Request primary and recent sources, then verify important claims against the cited material.
  • Use continuation requests to challenge assumptions, resolve conflicting evidence, and deepen weak sections.

Avoid

  • Do not submit broad topics without scope, decision criteria, or a required output structure.
  • Do not treat generated citations or conclusions as verified without opening and checking the sources.
  • Do not place API keys in prompts, command history, reports, or tracked files.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this package include the research script?
No. The audited package contains only SKILL.md, so the documented commands require a separately supplied compatible implementation.
Which service does this skill expect?
It expects Gemini Deep Research access through a Gemini API key and an implementation matching the documented command interface.
Which output formats are documented?
The documentation describes human-readable Markdown, structured JSON, and an unprocessed raw response mode.
How long does one research task take?
The documentation estimates 2-10 minutes and $2-5 per task, but complexity and provider pricing can change both.
Can I continue previous research?
Yes. The documented workflow uses an interaction identifier with continuation, status, wait, stream, and list options.
How should I validate the report?
Open cited sources, prefer primary evidence, check publication dates, and distinguish supported facts from model inference.

Developer Details

Author

sickn33

License

MIT

Skillstore revision

r2

Version notice

The author did not declare a version.

Ref

f9e2c34b4f19c7f3e6b0a1e93227b5f77cc12526

Maintenance freshness

7/26/2026

Usage

16 downloads ยท 104 views

File structure

๐Ÿ“„ SKILL.md

More from sickn33

View all
View all