Skills nature-reviewer

📦

nature-reviewer

Name: nature-reviewer
Author: Yuan1z0825

v0.1.0 Content revision r1 Safe 🌐 Network access⚙️ External commands

Simulate Nature-Style Reviewer Reports

Researchers often need an objective pre-submission critique before sending a manuscript. This skill turns supplied manuscript material into grounded Nature-style reviewer reports.

Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥈 81 Silver

Install with my Agent

Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.

Agent request

Review the Skillstore skill "nature-reviewer" from https://skillstore.io/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-reviewer.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-reviewer/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.

Agent-readable resources

Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.

Markdown detail GET /skills/yuan1z0825-nature-reviewer.md Signed manifest GET /api/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-reviewer/manifest Signed lockfile GET /api/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-reviewer/lockfile

Test it

Using "nature-reviewer". A manuscript abstract and figure legends for a new materials discovery claim.

Expected outcome:

Reviewer 1 finds the central claim potentially important but asks for stronger validation controls.
Reviewer 2 questions whether the result is sufficiently unexpected for a broad readership.
The synthesis highlights missing durability data as the main barrier to a stronger case.

Using "nature-reviewer". A partial methods and results section without full figures or statistical details.

Expected outcome:

The review marks several conclusions as not assessable from the provided material.
Technical soundness receives lower confidence because key controls and sample sizes are absent.
The broad-interest readout remains tentative until the main figures and comparisons are supplied.

Using "nature-reviewer". A full draft where the authors ask whether the narrative supports a Nature-style submission.

Expected outcome:

The reports separate field-local importance from interdisciplinary reach.
They identify which readers may care and why the current framing may be too narrow.
The synthesis lists the highest-priority revisions before submission.

Security Audit

Safe

v4 • 7/8/2026 Open versioned report

All static findings were adjudicated as false positives. The README URL is a source citation, the blocker hits are ordinary editorial-reference prose, and SKILL.md backticks are Markdown formatting. No evidence of prompt injection, data exfiltration, command execution, or malicious intent was found in the cited files.

Files scanned

614

Lines analyzed

Review items

False positives ignored

Risk Factors

🌐 Network access (1)

README.md:8

⚙️ External commands (12)

SKILL.md:20 SKILL.md:24 SKILL.md:29 SKILL.md:30 SKILL.md:31 SKILL.md:35 SKILL.md:56 SKILL.md:57 SKILL.md:64-96 SKILL.md:96-104 SKILL.md:104-123 SKILL.md:123-125

No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.

Audited by: codex View Audit History →

Share & cite this report

Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.

Open versioned report

Copy report link

https://skillstore.io/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-reviewer/audits/4?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-reviewer/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-reviewer?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-reviewer?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-reviewer/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Embed card

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-reviewer.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA citation

Yuan1z0825. (2026). nature-reviewer security audit report (audit version 4) [Author version 0.1.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-reviewer/audits/4

BibTeX citation

@techreport{yuan1z0825-yuan1z0825-nature-reviewer-2026,
  author = {Yuan1z0825},
  title = {nature-reviewer security audit report (audit version 4)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {4},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-reviewer/audits/4},
  note = {Author version 0.1.0}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "nature-reviewer security audit report (audit version 4)"
version: "0.1.0"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "Yuan1z0825"
date-released: "2026-07-08"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-reviewer/audits/4"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:yuan1z0825-nature-reviewer:audit:4"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore Score

Why this score Evidence Confidence: High

Architecture

100

Maintainability

Content

Community

Spec Compliance

What You Can Build

Pre-Submission Manuscript Review

Test whether a draft has clear novelty, significance, technical support, and broad-interest framing before submission.

Internal Lab Quality Check

Review a team manuscript with separate emphasis on evidence strength, readership, and unsupported claims.

Academic Writing Consultation

Convert a client draft into structured reviewer-style feedback without inventing reviewer identities or editorial outcomes.

Try These Prompts

Review an Abstract

Review this abstract from a Nature-style referee perspective. Return three reviewer reports, a synthesis, and any unsupported claims. Manuscript text: [paste abstract].

Assess a Partial Draft

Evaluate this partial manuscript package. Mark what is not assessable, identify technical failings, and explain who may care about the results. Materials: [paste sections].

Stress Test Submission Readiness

Run a Nature-style pre-submission review. Focus on originality, scientific importance, interdisciplinary readership, technical soundness, and readability. Include the strongest risks first.

Compare Reviewer Emphasis

Create three reports using the same fact base but different emphasis. Then synthesize consensus strengths, technical risks, and broad-interest concerns.

Best Practices

Provide the abstract, main claims, key evidence, and known limitations.
Include methods, controls, figures, and statistics when asking for technical critique.
State when materials are partial so the review can mark assessment boundaries.

Avoid

Asking for a guaranteed acceptance, rejection, or official editor decision.
Requesting invented reviewer identities, specialties, institutions, or confidential expertise.
Providing only a title and expecting detailed technical critique.