Review Code Against Standards and Specs
Code reviews can miss whether changes follow project rules and match the requested work. This skill separates standards review from specification review so each concern is visible.
Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.
Review the Skillstore skill "code-review" from https://skillstore.io/skills/mattpocock-code-review.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/mattpocock-code-review/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.
Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.
Using "code-review". Review since main for a branch that changes payment form validation.
Expected outcome:
Using "code-review". Review since HEAD~3 with no available spec.
Expected outcome:
The static findings are false positives caused by Markdown inline code and ordinary git review instructions. No prompt injection, data exfiltration, malware behavior, or unrelated destructive intent was found in SKILL.md.
Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.
https://skillstore.io/skills/mattpocock-code-review/audits/7?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report[](https://skillstore.io/skills/mattpocock-code-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge)<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/mattpocock-code-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/mattpocock-code-review/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a><iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/mattpocock-code-review.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>mattpocock. (2026). code-review security audit report (audit version 7) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/mattpocock-code-review/audits/7@techreport{mattpocock-mattpocock-code-review-2026,
author = {mattpocock},
title = {code-review security audit report (audit version 7)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {7},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/mattpocock-code-review/audits/7},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "code-review security audit report (audit version 7)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "mattpocock"
date-released: "2026-07-09"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/mattpocock-code-review/audits/7"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:mattpocock-code-review:audit:7"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Each author remains a separate installable skill. The recommended variant is ranked by Skillstore evidence.
Why this variant is first
21pounder-code-review
2026-08-21
daviddworetzky-code-review
2026-08-21
bind-code-review
2026-08-21
adammanuel-dev-code-review
2026-08-21
getsentry-code-review
2026-08-21
davila7-code-review
2026-08-21
89jobrien-code-review
2026-08-21
supercent-io-code-review
2026-08-21
ancplua-code-review
2026-08-21
cain96-code-review
2026-08-21
doyajin174-code-review
2026-08-21
mattpocock-code-review
2026-08-21
ericdumingtong-code-review
2026-08-21
coderabbitai-code-review
2026-08-21
Compare the branch against main and identify standards issues or missing specification requirements.
Use an issue, PRD, or spec file to confirm the diff matches the requested behavior.
Keep coding-standard feedback separate from spec-compliance feedback during review.
Review this branch since main.
Review the changes since commit abc123 against our standards and the spec.
Review since main using docs/specs/checkout-flow.md as the spec source.
Review since origin/main. Keep Standards and Spec findings separate, and note if any spec requirement is missing.
Author
mattpocockLicense
MIT
Skillstore revision
r1
Version notice
The author did not declare a version.
Ref
1ffa7643651792ccb4bd3b15d924d2c97edff755
Maintenance freshness
7/18/2026
Usage
3 downloads · 0 views
File structure
📄 SKILL.md
Guide TDD with Red-Green-Refactor
Test-first work often becomes brittle when teams test internals or write too many tests upfront. This skill guides Codex, Claude, and Claude Code through behavior-focused red-green-refactor cycles.
Sharpen Plans and Create Decision Documentation
Unresolved assumptions weaken plans and technical designs. This skill conducts a focused interview and uses domain modeling to produce ADRs and a glossary.
Stress-Test Your Plan Before Building
Unresolved decisions can make a plan expensive to change during implementation. This skill interviews you systematically and recommends an answer for each decision.
Create Agent Skills
Teams need consistent skill files that agents can discover and use correctly. This skill guides authors through structure, descriptions, examples, scripts, and review checks.
Build Focused Logic and UI Prototypes
Design decisions are difficult to evaluate before users can interact with them. This skill builds disposable prototypes that expose state behavior or compare interface variants.
Pressure-test plans with grilling interviews
Plans and designs often fail because weak assumptions are found too late. This skill starts a focused grilling session that challenges gaps before execution begins.
Review Code with Structured Quality Checks
by alirezarezvani
Code reviews can miss quality, security, and maintainability issues. This skill guides structured reviews with scripts, checklists, and report generation.
Review GitHub Pull Requests with CLI Utilities
by Bind
Pull request reviews require repeated eligibility checks, guideline discovery, and precise feedback. This skill documents a consistent CLI workflow for those tasks.
Improve Code Reviews With Structured Feedback
by sickn33
Code reviews can miss important risks or become hard to act on. This skill gives Claude, Codex, and Claude Code a structured review method with clear severity, rationale, and follow-up questions.
Evaluate Code Review Feedback Rigorously
by sickn33
Code review feedback can be unclear, incomplete, or wrong for the current codebase. This skill helps Claude, Codex, and Claude Code verify, prioritize, and respond with technical rigor.
Create Review-Ready Pull Requests
by sickn33
Pull request descriptions often miss context or reviewer needs. This skill guides Claude, Codex, and Claude Code through branch checks, diff review, draft PR creation, and Sentry-style descriptions.
Write Concise Pull Request Review Comments
by juliusbrussee
Pull request reviews often become too wordy for quick action. This skill formats feedback as concise, paste-ready comments with location, problem, and fix.