code-review
Review Pull Requests with AI Agents
Manual pull request review can miss bugs, logic errors, and repository rule violations. This skill coordinates multiple AI reviewers and validates findings before reporting concise results.
Install with my Agent
Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.
Review the Skillstore skill "code-review" from https://skillstore.io/skills/bind-code-review.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/bind-code-review/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.
Agent-readable resources
Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.
Test it
Using "code-review". Review the current branch pull request.
Expected outcome:
The skill summarizes the PR, checks applicable guidelines, and reports only validated issues with file and line references.
Using "code-review". Post review findings as comments.
Expected outcome:
The skill posts one concise inline comment per unique validated issue when the comment option is enabled.
Using "code-review". No validated issues are found.
Expected outcome:
The skill reports that no issues were found after checking for bugs and guideline compliance.
Security Audit
SafeThe static findings are false positives caused by Markdown inline code, fenced command examples, and example URLs in SKILL.md. The skill does instruct use of bun and GitHub CLI for pull request review, but the commands are transparent, purpose-bound, and tied to user-invoked review or comment workflows. No prompt injection, hidden exfiltration, or malicious intent was found.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (27)
🌐 Network access (2)
Share & cite this report
Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.
Copy report link
https://skillstore.io/skills/bind-code-review/audits/11?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown badge
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/bind-code-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML badge
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/bind-code-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/bind-code-review/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Embed card
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/bind-code-review.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA citation
Bind. (2026). code-review security audit report (audit version 11) [Author version 1.0.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/bind-code-review/audits/11BibTeX citation
@techreport{bind-bind-code-review-2026,
author = {Bind},
title = {code-review security audit report (audit version 11)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {11},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/bind-code-review/audits/11},
note = {Author version 1.0.0}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "code-review security audit report (audit version 11)"
version: "1.0.0"
type: report
authors:
- name: "Bind"
date-released: "2026-07-09"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/bind-code-review/audits/11"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:bind-code-review:audit:11"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Compare variants
14 installable variantsEach author remains a separate installable skill. The recommended variant is ranked by Skillstore evidence.
Why this variant is first
21pounder-code-review
2026-09-09
daviddworetzky-code-review
2026-09-09
bind-code-review
2026-09-09
adammanuel-dev-code-review
2026-09-09
getsentry-code-review
2026-09-09
davila7-code-review
2026-09-09
89jobrien-code-review
2026-09-09
supercent-io-code-review
2026-09-09
ancplua-code-review
2026-09-09
cain96-code-review
2026-09-09
doyajin174-code-review
2026-09-09
mattpocock-code-review
2026-09-09
ericdumingtong-code-review
2026-09-09
coderabbitai-code-review
2026-09-09
Skillstore Score
Why this score Evidence Confidence: HighWhat You Can Build
Pre-merge bug screening
Run a focused review before merging a meaningful pull request.
Repository guideline enforcement
Check whether changed files follow applicable AGENTS.md rules.
AI-assisted reviewer support
Generate high-signal review notes that a human reviewer can verify.
Try These Prompts
/code-review
/code-review --comment
Run /code-review and focus on AGENTS.md compliance for this pull request.
Run /code-review and report only validated runtime bugs or logic issues introduced by this PR.
Best Practices
- Use it on focused pull requests with clear descriptions and meaningful diffs.
- Keep AGENTS.md rules specific so compliance findings can cite exact requirements.
- Review posted comments before treating them as merge blockers.
Avoid
- Do not use it as the only review for security-critical changes.
- Do not run it on urgent hotfixes when immediate human judgment is required.
- Do not treat subjective suggestions as findings unless repository guidelines require them.