Skills code-review
📦

code-review

v1.0.0 Content revision r1 Safe ⚙️ External commands📁 Filesystem access

Improve Code Review Quality

Slow, unclear reviews delay releases and miss defects. This skill gives authors, reviewers, and team leads practical workflows for focused pull requests.

Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)
🥈 80 Silver

Install with my Agent

Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.

Agent request
Review the Skillstore skill "code-review" from https://skillstore.io/skills/adammanuel-dev-code-review.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/adammanuel-dev-code-review/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.

Agent-readable resources

Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.

Markdown detail GET /skills/adammanuel-dev-code-review.md Signed manifest GET /api/skills/adammanuel-dev-code-review/manifest Signed lockfile GET /api/skills/adammanuel-dev-code-review/lockfile

Test it

Using "code-review". Author asks for a pre-PR readiness review.

Expected outcome:

  • Readiness summary with pass, warning, and blocker items.
  • Checklist covering tests, scope, documentation, deployment notes, and security considerations.
  • Suggested reviewers based on ownership areas and change risk.

Using "code-review". Reviewer asks for help reviewing an authentication pull request.

Expected outcome:

  • Pass one findings about design, authorization risk, and scope.
  • Pass two findings about logic, error handling, test coverage, and naming.
  • Final recommendation with comments grouped by severity label.

Using "code-review". Team lead asks how to roll out better code reviews.

Expected outcome:

  • Adoption plan for a small pilot, team rollout, and ongoing measurement.
  • Recommended review SLAs and pull request size targets.
  • Template checklist for author and reviewer expectations.

Security Audit

Safe
v8 • 7/5/2026 Open versioned report

The static alerts are false positives caused by Markdown inline code, example shell snippets, relative documentation links, CODEOWNERS patterns, and environment template filenames. No prompt injection, credential exfiltration, hidden execution, or unsafe filesystem access was found in the reviewed context. The skill is process guidance for pull requests and code review, with visible project-check examples.

9
Files scanned
3,375
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Risk Factors

⚙️ External commands (63)
playbook/author-guide.md:99-125 playbook/comment-classification.md:129-136 playbook/comment-classification.md:177-180 playbook/comment-classification.md:211-212 playbook/comment-classification.md:212-213 playbook/comment-classification.md:213-216 playbook/comment-classification.md:266 playbook/comment-classification.md:273 playbook/comment-classification.md:318-321 playbook/comment-classification.md:386-389 playbook/reviewer-guide.md:181-182 playbook/reviewer-guide.md:215-222 playbook/reviewer-guide.md:250 playbook/reviewer-guide.md:343-344 playbook/reviewer-guide.md:372 playbook/reviewer-guide.md:433-436 playbook/reviewer-guide.md:483 SKILL.md:45 SKILL.md:46 SKILL.md:47 SKILL.md:64-77 SKILL.md:77-93 SKILL.md:93-109 SKILL.md:109-138 SKILL.md:138-157 SKILL.md:157-163 SKILL.md:163-169 SKILL.md:169-258 SKILL.md:258-263 SKILL.md:263-266 SKILL.md:266-291 SKILL.md:291-320 SKILL.md:320-341 SKILL.md:341-347 SKILL.md:347-348 SKILL.md:348-349 SKILL.md:349-385 SKILL.md:385-386 SKILL.md:386-389 SKILL.md:389-390 SKILL.md:390-391 SKILL.md:391-392 SKILL.md:392-393 SKILL.md:393-396 SKILL.md:396-397 SKILL.md:397-398 SKILL.md:398-401 SKILL.md:401-414 SKILL.md:414-432 SKILL.md:432-443 SKILL.md:443-456 SKILL.md:456-459 SKILL.md:459-493 SKILL.md:493-508 SKILL.md:508-512 SKILL.md:512-520 SKILL.md:520-528 SKILL.md:528-529 SKILL.md:529-530 SKILL.md:530-532 SKILL.md:532-536 SKILL.md:536-540 SKILL.md:540-546
📁 Filesystem access (8)
playbook/comment-classification.md:201 templates/author-checklist.md:219 templates/author-checklist.md:220 templates/codeowners-template.md:75 templates/codeowners-template.md:76 templates/reviewer-checklist.md:382 templates/reviewer-checklist.md:383 templates/reviewer-checklist.md:384
No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.
Audited by: codex View Audit History →
Share & cite this report

Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.

Open versioned report
Security Assessment

Copy report link

https://skillstore.io/skills/adammanuel-dev-code-review/audits/8?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/adammanuel-dev-code-review/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/adammanuel-dev-code-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/adammanuel-dev-code-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/adammanuel-dev-code-review/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Embed card

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/adammanuel-dev-code-review.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA citation

Claude Assistant. (2026). code-review security audit report (audit version 8) [Author version 1.0.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/adammanuel-dev-code-review/audits/8

BibTeX citation

@techreport{claude-assistant-adammanuel-dev-code-review-2026, author = {Claude Assistant}, title = {code-review security audit report (audit version 8)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {8}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/adammanuel-dev-code-review/audits/8}, note = {Author version 1.0.0} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "code-review security audit report (audit version 8)" version: "1.0.0" type: report authors: - name: "Claude Assistant" date-released: "2026-07-05" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/adammanuel-dev-code-review/audits/8" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:adammanuel-dev-code-review:audit:8" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Compare variants

14 installable variants

Each author remains a separate installable skill. The recommended variant is ranked by Skillstore evidence.

Why this variant is first

Higher Skillstore usage
21pounder Recommended

21pounder-code-review

Skillstore Score 80
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 58
Updated

2026-08-21

DavidDworetzky

daviddworetzky-code-review

Skillstore Score 80
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 18
Updated

2026-08-21

Bind

bind-code-review

Skillstore Score 80
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 14
Updated

2026-08-21

Claude Assistant Current

adammanuel-dev-code-review

Skillstore Score 80
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 9
Updated

2026-08-21

getsentry

getsentry-code-review

Skillstore Score 79
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 23
Updated

2026-08-21

davila7

davila7-code-review

Skillstore Score 79
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 11
Updated

2026-08-21

Joseph OBrien

89jobrien-code-review

Skillstore Score 78
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 46
Updated

2026-08-21

supercent-io

supercent-io-code-review

Skillstore Score 78
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 27
Updated

2026-08-21

ANcpLua

ancplua-code-review

Skillstore Score 78
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 12
Updated

2026-08-21

Cain96

cain96-code-review

Skillstore Score 78
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 10
Updated

2026-08-21

Doyajin174

doyajin174-code-review

Skillstore Score 78
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 8
Updated

2026-08-21

mattpocock

mattpocock-code-review

Skillstore Score 77
Evidence Confidence Medium
Skillstore usage 5
Updated

2026-08-21

EricDuMingTong

ericdumingtong-code-review

Skillstore Score 75
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 16
Updated

2026-08-21

coderabbitai

coderabbitai-code-review

Skillstore Score 38
Evidence Confidence Medium
Skillstore usage 16
Updated

2026-08-21

Skillstore Score

Why this score Evidence Confidence: High
55
Architecture
100
Maintainability
87
Content
75
Community
78
Spec Compliance

What You Can Build

Prepare a Pull Request

Run a structured author checklist before opening a pull request, including tests, scope, documentation, and risk notes.

Review Complex Changes

Use a two-pass review method to assess design first, then implementation details and test quality.

Standardize Team Reviews

Create shared templates, reviewer ownership, review SLAs, and practical metrics for a team review process.

Try These Prompts

Check My Pull Request 
Use the code-review skill to check my branch before I open a pull request. Focus on scope, tests, description quality, and reviewer readiness.
Guide My Review 
Use the code-review skill to guide my review of this pull request. Start with design and risk, then move to implementation, tests, and readability.
Classify Feedback 
Use the comment classification guidance to rewrite my review feedback. Label each item as critical, issue, suggestion, nit, question, or praise.
Improve Team Workflow 
Use the code-review skill to design a team review workflow. Include PR templates, CODEOWNERS guidance, review SLAs, metrics, and adoption steps.

Best Practices

  • Use small, focused pull requests with clear context, test plans, and rollback notes.
  • Review design and risk before commenting on implementation details.
  • Classify comments so authors know what must change and what is optional.

Avoid

  • Opening large pull requests with weak context and no self-review.
  • Blocking on style nits that should be handled by automated tooling.
  • Tracking raw comment counts instead of useful review outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this skill replace human code review?
No. It guides review preparation and review structure, but humans still decide risk, design fit, and merge readiness.
Can it run my project tests?
It can suggest visible local quality gates. Actual command execution depends on the AI tool, repository scripts, and user approval.
Does it work with Claude, Codex, and Claude Code?
Yes. The skill declares support for Claude, Codex, and Claude Code.
What review method does it use?
It uses a two-pass method. Review design, scope, and risk first, then check implementation, tests, and readability.
Can it help create templates?
Yes. It includes guidance for pull request templates, CODEOWNERS, author checklists, and reviewer checklists.
Is it a security scanner?
No. It includes security review prompts, but it does not replace SAST, secret scanning, dependency scanning, or manual security review.

Developer Details

License

MIT

Author version

v1.0.0

Skillstore revision

r1

Repository

https://github.com/AdamManuel-dev/claude-code-ext/tree/main/skills/code-review-skill

Ref

6eec4a59f63ff83440a84c18d1aef79743bc714e

Maintenance freshness

7/18/2026

Usage

5 downloads · 544 views

File structure

📁 playbook/

📄 author-guide.md

📄 comment-classification.md

📄 reviewer-guide.md

📄 team-adoption.md

📁 templates/

📄 author-checklist.md

📄 codeowners-template.md

📄 pr-template.md

📄 reviewer-checklist.md

📄 SKILL.md

More from Claude Assistant

Related Skills

View all