📦
venue-templates
85Prepare Academic Venue Submissions
Academic submissions often fail because formatting rules vary by venue. This skill provides templates, requirements, and examples for faster preparation.
Research & Learning View
Skills peer-review
📦
peer-review
Content revision r1 Safe ⚙️ External commands
Review Scientific Manuscripts Rigorously
Scientific reviews need structured, defensible critique across methods, statistics, ethics, and reporting. This skill guides Claude, Codex, and Claude Code through checklist-based reviews with constructive feedback.
Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Install with my Agent
Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.
Agent request
Review the Skillstore skill "peer-review" from https://skillstore.io/skills/k-dense-ai-peer-review.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/k-dense-ai-peer-review/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.
Agent-readable resources
Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.
Test it
Using "peer-review". Manuscript with unreported sample size justification and multiple uncorrected statistical tests.
Expected outcome:
The review flags inadequate power justification, asks for multiple-testing correction, and recommends confidence intervals with effect sizes.
Using "peer-review". Systematic review draft missing a protocol registration and PRISMA flow information.
Expected outcome:
The output identifies reporting gaps, requests protocol details, and asks authors to clarify study selection and quality assessment.
Using "peer-review". Slide deck with small figure labels and crowded results slides.
Expected outcome:
The feedback lists slide-specific readability issues, recommends larger labels, and suggests simplifying overloaded results slides.
Security Audit
Safev10 • 7/9/2026 Open versioned report
All 17 static findings were assessed as false positives. The blocker matches are scientific review checklist prose, and the external command matches are Markdown fences or documented local helper examples. No prompt injection, exfiltration intent, credential access, or destructive behavior was found.
3
Files scanned
1,415
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Risk Factors
No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.
Audited by: codex View Audit History →
Share & cite this report
Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.
Copy report link
https://skillstore.io/skills/k-dense-ai-peer-review/audits/10?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown badge
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/k-dense-ai-peer-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML badge
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/k-dense-ai-peer-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/k-dense-ai-peer-review/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Embed card
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/k-dense-ai-peer-review.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA citation
K-Dense-AI. (2026). peer-review security audit report (audit version 10) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/k-dense-ai-peer-review/audits/10BibTeX citation
@techreport{k-dense-ai-k-dense-ai-peer-review-2026,
author = {K-Dense-AI},
title = {peer-review security audit report (audit version 10)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {10},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/k-dense-ai-peer-review/audits/10},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "peer-review security audit report (audit version 10)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "K-Dense-AI"
date-released: "2026-07-09"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/k-dense-ai-peer-review/audits/10"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:k-dense-ai-peer-review:audit:10"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Compare variants
2 installable variantsEach author remains a separate installable skill. The recommended variant is ranked by Skillstore evidence.
Why this variant is first
Higher Skillstore usage
Author / source Skillstore Score Evidence Confidence Skillstore usage Updated
davila7 Recommended
davila7-peer-review
Skillstore Score 74
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 13
Updated
2026-08-21
K-Dense-AI Current
k-dense-ai-peer-review
Skillstore Score 74
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 9
Updated
2026-08-21
Skillstore Score
Why this score Evidence Confidence: High 41
Architecture
85
Maintainability
87
Content
70
Community
78
Spec Compliance
What You Can Build
Journal Manuscript Review
Prepare a structured review with major comments, minor comments, and a recommendation tied to manuscript evidence.
Grant Proposal Evaluation
Assess significance, innovation, feasibility, rigor, risks, and missing details before a panel discussion.
Pre-Submission Quality Check
Identify reporting, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, and presentation gaps before submitting research work.
Try These Prompts
Basic Manuscript Review
Review this manuscript for major strengths, major concerns, and publication readiness. Focus on methods, statistics, reproducibility, and clarity.
Checklist-Based Journal Review
Use this journal scope and manuscript text to write a structured review. Include a summary, major comments, minor comments, and author questions.
Grant Proposal Evaluation
Evaluate this grant proposal for significance, innovation, feasibility, methods, risks, and reviewer-facing weaknesses. Separate essential fixes from optional improvements.
Presentation Review From Slide Images
Review these slide images for scientific content, readability, layout, accessibility, and timing. Give slide-specific issues and a final recommendation.
Best Practices
- Provide the full manuscript, venue requirements, study type, and any reviewer form before starting.
- Ask for prioritized major and minor comments so authors can act on the review.
- Check the recommendation against the stated evidence before sending the final review.
Avoid
- Do not ask for broad extra experiments without explaining why they are necessary.
- Do not mix personal style preferences with issues that affect validity or clarity.
- Do not use the skill to produce confidential reviews for people who should not access them.
Frequently Asked Questions
What documents should I provide?
Provide the manuscript, figures, supplementary files, journal guidance, and any review form. Add discipline and deadline details if relevant.
Can it review grants?
Yes. It can assess significance, innovation, feasibility, rigor, risks, and reviewer-facing weaknesses in proposals.
Does it check reporting standards?
Yes. It includes guidance for standards such as CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, ARRIVE, MIAME, and MINSEQE.
Can it review presentations?
Yes. It can review slide images for scientific content, layout, readability, accessibility, and timing.
Will it make a publication decision?
It can recommend accept, revise, or reject based on supplied criteria. Editors or program officers make final decisions.
Is it suitable for blinded review?
Yes, but remove identifying details you should not share. Follow the journal or funder confidentiality policy.
Developer Details
Author
K-Dense-AILicense
MIT license
Skillstore revision
r1
Version notice
The author did not declare a version.
Repository
https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills/tree/main/scientific-skills/peer-reviewRef
26421118b848d9f1efc0aa169d8a7a9e7e0a877e
Maintenance freshness
7/18/2026
Usage
7 downloads · 220 views
File structure
More from K-Dense-AI
View all📦
iso-13485-certification
85Prepare ISO 13485 Certification Docs
Medical device teams must create complete QMS documentation before certification audits. This skill provides templates, checklists, and gap analysis guidance for ISO 13485 readiness.
Documentation View
📦
pytdc
82Analyze therapeutic ML datasets with PyTDC
Drug discovery teams need reliable datasets and fair evaluation protocols. This skill helps Claude use PyTDC for curated therapeutic ML data, benchmark splits, metrics, and molecular oracles.
Data & Analytics View
📦
diffdock
81Run DiffDock Molecular Docking
Protein-ligand docking requires careful setup, parameter choices, and result interpretation. This skill guides DiffDock workflows for poses, confidence scores, and screening.
Research & Learning View
📦
statistical-analysis
80Analyze Research Data with Statistical Guidance
Choosing tests and reporting results can be slow and error-prone. This skill guides test selection, assumptions, effect sizes, power analysis, Bayesian options, and APA reporting.
Data & Analytics View
📦
scanpy
80Analyze Single-Cell RNA-seq with Scanpy
Single-cell RNA-seq analysis requires many linked decisions across QC, normalization, clustering, and plotting. This skill gives Claude, Codex, and Claude Code structured Scanpy workflows, reference guidance, and reusable analysis scripts.
Data & Analytics View
Related Skills
View all📦
nature-reviewer
81Simulate Nature-Style Reviewer Reports
by Yuan1z0825
Researchers often need an objective pre-submission critique before sending a manuscript. This skill turns supplied manuscript material into grounded Nature-style reviewer reports.
Research & Learning View
📦
nature-statistics
78Audit Statistical Reporting for Nature Journals
by yuan1z0825
Manuscripts often omit design details or overstate statistical evidence. This skill audits reporting and drafts precise revisions without inventing missing facts.
Research & Learning View
📦
nature-paper-card
85Analyze One Scientific Paper as an Evidence Card
by yuan1z0825
Scientific papers are difficult to evaluate when claims, methods, and evidence are scattered across sections. This skill creates a structured, traceable Paper Card with explicit limits.
Research & Learning View
📦
scholar-evaluation
80Evaluate Scholarly Work with ScholarEval
by davila7
Academic reviews can be inconsistent and difficult to compare across drafts. This skill applies structured ScholarEval criteria to produce clear scores, evidence-based feedback, and revision priorities.
Research & Learning View
📦
paper-context-resolver
75Resolve Paper Details for Reliable Reproduction
by lllllllama
Repository documentation can omit details that are essential for reproducing deep learning results. This skill resolves narrow gaps from primary paper sources while documenting conflicts.
Research & Learning View
📦
scientific-writing
75Write Clear Scientific Manuscripts
by davila7
Scientific manuscripts require precise structure, evidence, and reporting standards. This skill guides drafting, revision, citations, visuals, and journal preparation through a structured workflow.
Research & Learning View