Habilidades peer-review
🔬

peer-review

Seguro 🌐 Acesso à rede⚙️ Comandos externos

Review scientific manuscripts systematically

Também disponível em: K-Dense-AI

Peer review of scientific manuscripts requires consistent methodology across disciplines. This skill provides structured frameworks for evaluating methodology, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, and reporting standards for comprehensive manuscript and grant assessment.

Suporta: Claude Codex Code(CC)
⚠️ 68 Ruim
1

Baixar o ZIP da skill

2

Upload no Claude

Vá em Configurações → Capacidades → Skills → Upload skill

3

Ative e comece a usar

Testar

A utilizar "peer-review". Review this research manuscript on clinical trial outcomes

Resultado esperado:

  • Summary: This randomized controlled trial evaluates a new intervention for chronic condition management. The study addresses an important clinical question with a well-designed primary outcome.
  • Major concerns: Sample size calculation lacks justification for effect size assumptions. Statistical methods appropriate but multiple testing correction not applied for secondary outcomes.
  • Strengths: Rigorous randomization and blinding procedures. CONSORT guidelines followed. Clear methods description.
  • Recommendations: Apply FDR correction for secondary outcomes. Provide post-hoc power analysis details. Clarify exclusion criteria.
  • Overall recommendation: Major revisions required before publication.

Pontuação de qualidade

41
Arquitetura
100
Manutenibilidade
83
Conteúdo
22
Comunidade
100
Segurança
78
Conformidade com especificações

O Que Você Pode Construir

Manuscript evaluation

Conduct comprehensive peer review of research manuscripts with systematic methodology and statistical assessment.

Grant proposal assessment

Evaluate grant proposals for methodological rigor, feasibility, and scientific significance across disciplines.

Pre-submission review

Self-assess manuscripts before journal submission to identify and address potential reviewer concerns proactively.

Tente Estes Prompts

Basic manuscript review 
Review this scientific manuscript using the peer-review skill. Evaluate the methodology, statistical analysis, reproducibility, and reporting standards compliance. Provide a structured review with major comments, minor comments, and an overall recommendation.
Grant evaluation 
Evaluate this grant proposal using the peer-review skill. Assess the research design, methodology rigor, feasibility, and scientific significance. Provide detailed feedback on strengths, weaknesses, and specific concerns.
Statistical review focus 
Conduct a focused statistical review of this manuscript using the peer-review skill. Evaluate statistical methods, sample size justification, assumption checking, multiple testing correction, and appropriate effect size reporting.
Reproducibility check 
Assess the reproducibility of this research using the peer-review skill. Review data availability, code sharing, methodological detail, and compliance with relevant reporting guidelines. Identify specific gaps that would prevent independent replication.

Melhores Práticas

  • Provide specific, actionable feedback with concrete examples from the manuscript
  • Distinguish between major issues affecting validity and minor issues affecting clarity
  • Balance criticism with acknowledgment of manuscript strengths

Evitar

  • Making vague criticisms without specific line or page references
  • Requesting unnecessary experiments beyond the study scope
  • Using dismissive or condescending language regardless of manuscript quality

Perguntas Frequentes

Does this skill work for all scientific disciplines?
Yes. The framework covers core principles applicable across disciplines with discipline-specific reporting standards references.
Can this skill review grant proposals?
Yes. The methodology assessment criteria apply directly to evaluating grant proposals for rigor and feasibility.
Does the skill access external databases?
No. This is a prompt-based skill that provides evaluation frameworks but cannot verify citations or access external databases.
Is statistical expertise required to use this skill?
No. The skill provides guidance on evaluating statistical methods at a conceptual level for general reviewers.
Can this skill generate the actual review letter?
Yes. The skill provides structured templates and frameworks for generating comprehensive review reports.
How does this compare to other review tools?
This skill provides comprehensive human-guided evaluation frameworks rather than automated checklists or citation checkers.

Detalhes do Desenvolvedor

Autor

davila7

Licença

MIT

Repositório

https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates/tree/main/cli-tool/components/skills/scientific/peer-review

Referência

main

Estrutura de arquivos

📁 references/

📄 common_issues.md

📄 reporting_standards.md

📄 SKILL.md