Skills paper-context-resolver

📦

paper-context-resolver

Name: paper-context-resolver
Author: lllllllama

Content revision r2 Safe ⚙️ External commands

Resolve Paper Details for Reliable Reproduction

Repository documentation can omit details that are essential for reproducing deep learning results. This skill resolves narrow gaps from primary paper sources while documenting conflicts.

Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)

📊 75 Adequate

This skill is part of a pack

Install the whole pack to get every skill the task needs, in one command.

Paper Skills Pack · 3 skills Install whole pack

Install with my Agent

Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.

Agent request

Review the Skillstore skill "paper-context-resolver" from https://skillstore.io/skills/lllllllama-paper-context-resolver.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/lllllllama-paper-context-resolver/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.

Agent-readable resources

Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.

Markdown detail GET /skills/lllllllama-paper-context-resolver.md Signed manifest GET /api/skills/lllllllama-paper-context-resolver/manifest Signed lockfile GET /api/skills/lllllllama-paper-context-resolver/lockfile

Test it

Using "paper-context-resolver". The README names the dataset but not the evaluation split. Check the linked paper.

Expected outcome:

The paper evaluates on the official validation split. The README does not contradict this, but it does not state the split explicitly.

Using "paper-context-resolver". Determine whether the released checkpoint matches the base or large model.

Expected outcome:

Direct evidence: The project page labels the checkpoint as the base variant.
Repository evidence: The filename does not identify a variant.
Resolution: Treat it as the base model and preserve the missing repository label as a documentation gap.

Using "paper-context-resolver". The README and paper specify different image sizes. Which value should the reproduction report use?

Expected outcome:

Record both values as a conflict. Preserve the README-first instruction for repository reproduction and note the paper value as supporting context.

Security Audit

Safe

v5 • 8/8/2026 Open versioned report

Both static findings are false positives caused by Markdown backticks around a skill slug and a reference path in SKILL.md. No command execution, prompt injection, or other malicious intent was found.

Files scanned

105

Lines analyzed

Review items

False positives ignored

Risk Factors

⚙️ External commands (2)

SKILL.md:9 SKILL.md:49

No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.

Audited by: codex View Audit History →

Share & cite this report

Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.

Open versioned report

Copy report link

https://skillstore.io/skills/lllllllama-paper-context-resolver/audits/5?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/lllllllama-paper-context-resolver/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/lllllllama-paper-context-resolver?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/lllllllama-paper-context-resolver?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/lllllllama-paper-context-resolver/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Embed card

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/lllllllama-paper-context-resolver.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA citation

lllllllama. (2026). paper-context-resolver security audit report (audit version 5) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/lllllllama-paper-context-resolver/audits/5

BibTeX citation

@techreport{lllllllama-lllllllama-paper-context-resolver-2026,
  author = {lllllllama},
  title = {paper-context-resolver security audit report (audit version 5)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {5},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/lllllllama-paper-context-resolver/audits/5},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "paper-context-resolver security audit report (audit version 5)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "lllllllama"
date-released: "2026-08-08"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/lllllllama-paper-context-resolver/audits/5"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:lllllllama-paper-context-resolver:audit:5"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore Score

Why this score Evidence Confidence: High

Architecture

Maintainability

Content

Community

Spec Compliance

What You Can Build

Clarify an Evaluation Split

Compare the repository instructions with the linked paper to identify the exact evaluation split and document any disagreement.

Verify Preprocessing Details

Extract only the preprocessing details needed to complete an experiment when the README omits essential parameters.

Map Checkpoints to Variants

Use primary source evidence to connect available checkpoints with documented model variants without assuming unsupported mappings.

Try These Prompts

Resolve One Missing Detail

The README does not specify [missing detail]. Use [paper link] to answer only this reproduction question and distinguish evidence from inference.

Check a Dataset Split

Compare the repository evidence with the primary paper for the [dataset] split. State each source's claim and record any conflict.

Verify an Evaluation Protocol

Resolve the evaluation protocol for [model and task]. Check metrics, data partition, checkpoint selection, and preprocessing using primary sources only.

Produce an Evidence Resolution

Given [repository evidence], [paper sources], and [reproduction question], produce a narrow answer with source claims, conflicts, inferences, and unresolved uncertainty.

Best Practices

Start with one concrete reproduction-critical question after reviewing the README and repository files.
Prefer README-linked papers, official project pages, arXiv, or OpenReview primary records.
Report source disagreements explicitly and label every inference.

Avoid

Do not request a general summary when only one reproduction detail is missing.
Do not replace README instructions silently with values from a paper.
Do not present speculative settings as source-supported reproduction requirements.