📦
verification-before-completion
79Verify Completion Claims Before Reporting
Completion claims can be wrong when agents rely on memory or confidence. This skill requires fresh evidence before reporting success.
Coding & Development View
Skills requesting-code-review
📦
requesting-code-review
Content revision r1 Safe ⚙️ External commands
Request Consistent Code Reviews
Code review requests often miss context, scope, or acceptance criteria. This skill creates a structured brief for Claude, Codex, or Claude Code reviewers.
Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Install with my Agent
Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.
Agent request
Review the Skillstore skill "requesting-code-review" from https://skillstore.io/skills/codingcossack-requesting-code-review.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/codingcossack-requesting-code-review/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.
Agent-readable resources
Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.
Test it
Using "requesting-code-review". A developer finished a branch that adds account verification and wants an AI review before merge.
Expected outcome:
- The response frames the implementation scope and expected behavior.
- It asks the reviewer to inspect the selected Git range against the requirements.
- It requests Critical, Important, and Minor findings with a merge readiness verdict.
Using "requesting-code-review". An engineering lead completed several plan tasks and wants review before starting the next batch.
Expected outcome:
- The response identifies the plan section, completed work, and review boundaries.
- It emphasizes tests, architecture, missing requirements, and production risks.
- It directs the reviewer to explain each issue with impact and a fix path.
Using "requesting-code-review". A quality team wants a consistent checklist for merge request review requests.
Expected outcome:
- The response creates a standard request format with context, scope, and acceptance criteria.
- It asks for specific file references and a clear readiness decision.
Security Audit
Safev8 • 7/6/2026 Open versioned report
All static findings were determined to be false positives. The detected patterns are Markdown fences, inert template placeholders, local read-only Git commands, and ordinary review guidance with no malicious intent found.
2
Files scanned
252
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Risk Factors
No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.
Audited by: codex View Audit History →
Share & cite this report
Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.
Copy report link
https://skillstore.io/skills/codingcossack-requesting-code-review/audits/8?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown badge
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/codingcossack-requesting-code-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML badge
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/codingcossack-requesting-code-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/codingcossack-requesting-code-review/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Embed card
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/codingcossack-requesting-code-review.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA citation
CodingCossack. (2026). requesting-code-review security audit report (audit version 8) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/codingcossack-requesting-code-review/audits/8BibTeX citation
@techreport{codingcossack-codingcossack-requesting-code-review-2026,
author = {CodingCossack},
title = {requesting-code-review security audit report (audit version 8)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {8},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/codingcossack-requesting-code-review/audits/8},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "requesting-code-review security audit report (audit version 8)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "CodingCossack"
date-released: "2026-07-06"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/codingcossack-requesting-code-review/audits/8"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:codingcossack-requesting-code-review:audit:8"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Compare variants
9 installable variantsEach author remains a separate installable skill. The recommended variant is ranked by Skillstore evidence.
Why this variant is first
Highest Skillstore Score
Author / source Skillstore Score Evidence Confidence Skillstore usage Updated
DMJGilbert Recommended
dmjgilbert-requesting-code-review
Skillstore Score 79
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 11
Updated
2026-08-21
obra-requesting-code-review
Skillstore Score 78
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 13
Updated
2026-08-21
cycleaddict-requesting-code-review
Skillstore Score 78
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 12
Updated
2026-08-21
CodingCossack Current
codingcossack-requesting-code-review
Skillstore Score 78
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 12
Updated
2026-08-21
sickn33-requesting-code-review
Skillstore Score 78
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 11
Updated
2026-08-21
cygnusfear-requesting-code-review
Skillstore Score 78
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 7
Updated
2026-08-21
davila7-requesting-code-review
Skillstore Score 78
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 4
Updated
2026-08-21
dyai2025-requesting-code-review
Skillstore Score 75
Evidence Confidence Medium
Skillstore usage 8
Updated
2026-08-21
zhanlincui-requesting-code-review
Skillstore Score 70
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 440
Updated
2026-08-21
Skillstore Score
Why this score Evidence Confidence: High 55
Architecture
85
Maintainability
87
Content
71
Community
83
Spec Compliance
What You Can Build
Prepare Pull Request Reviews
Create a complete review brief before requesting feedback on a pull request.
Review Plan-Based Work
Ask an AI reviewer to compare completed tasks against a plan or requirements document.
Standardize Merge Checks
Use consistent severity levels, test expectations, and readiness criteria before merging changes.
Try These Prompts
Basic Review Request
Create a code review request for my current branch. Include what changed, the Git range, tests run, and a merge readiness question.
Requirements Comparison Review
Prepare a review brief that compares my implementation against these requirements: [paste requirements]. Highlight risk areas and acceptance criteria.
Subagent Review Dispatch
Use the code-reviewer template to review this change range. Focus on correctness, architecture, tests, security, and production readiness.
Release Readiness Gate
Create an advanced review request for a release gate. Include scope, non-goals, migrations, rollback concerns, test evidence, and clear pass criteria.
Best Practices
- Provide the reviewer with the exact Git range and the requirement source.
- List tests that were run and tests that were intentionally deferred.
- Act on Critical and Important findings before continuing dependent work.
Avoid
- Do not request review without explaining what changed and why.
- Do not treat a vague approval as a substitute for issue-based review.
- Do not ignore valid Important findings before merging production code.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill help me create?
It helps create a structured request for reviewing code changes before merge.
Does it run the code review itself?
No. It prepares the brief and template for Claude, Codex, Claude Code, or another reviewer.
What information should I provide?
Provide what changed, the requirements, the base and head commits, tests run, and known risk areas.
Can it support pull requests and merge requests?
Yes. The workflow fits pull requests, merge requests, branch reviews, and commit-range reviews.
How are findings organized?
The template asks for Critical, Important, and Minor findings plus a merge readiness assessment.
Is it safe for sensitive repositories?
Use normal repository security controls. The skill does not require network access or secret handling.
Developer Details
Author
CodingCossackLicense
MIT
Skillstore revision
r1
Version notice
The author did not declare a version.
Repository
https://github.com/CodingCossack/agent-skills-library/tree/main/skills/requesting-code-reviewRef
d11af420e07cd866fe39cfa937efef3223896c06
Maintenance freshness
7/18/2026
Usage
7 downloads · 247 views
File structure
More from CodingCossack
View all📦
brainstorming
79Shape Ideas Into Validated Designs
Early ideas often lack enough detail for confident implementation. This skill guides structured questions, trade-off analysis, and design validation before work begins.
Productivity View
📦
executing-plans
79Execute Implementation Plans with Checkpoints
Implementation plans can fail when agents skip reviews or tests. This skill guides Claude, Codex, and Claude Code through batched execution with checkpoints.
Coding & Development View
📦
writing-skills
79Build Tested AI Skills
Unclear skills can cause agents to skip guidance or follow weak instructions. This skill helps authors create, test, refine, and verify reusable AI skills for Claude, Codex, and Claude Code.
Documentation View
📦
receiving-code-review
79Evaluate Code Review Feedback
Code review feedback can be unclear, incorrect, or broader than the task. This skill helps Claude, Codex, and Claude Code verify comments, clarify intent, and make focused changes.
Coding & Development View
📦
dispatching-parallel-agents
78Coordinate Parallel AI Coding Agents
Large coding investigations slow down when unrelated failures are handled one at a time. This skill helps Claude, Codex, and Claude Code split independent work into focused subagent tasks and integrate results.
Coding & Development View
Related Skills
View all📦
code-reviewer
83Review Code with Structured Quality Checks
by alirezarezvani
Code reviews can miss quality, security, and maintainability issues. This skill guides structured reviews with scripts, checklists, and report generation.
Coding & Development View
📦
workflow-patterns
80Implement Tasks with TDD Workflow
by sickn33
Task plans can drift when implementation, tests, commits, and approvals are handled inconsistently. This skill provides a structured TDD workflow with checkpoints, verification gates, and git tracking.
Coding & Development View
📦
github-pr
80Review GitHub Pull Requests with CLI Utilities
by Bind
Pull request reviews require repeated eligibility checks, guideline discovery, and precise feedback. This skill documents a consistent CLI workflow for those tasks.
Coding & Development View
📦
git-advanced
86Master Advanced Git Workflows
by AutumnsGrove
Complex Git maintenance can make history changes and conflict resolution difficult. This skill provides structured guidance, recovery steps, and an optional local helper for common advanced workflows.
Coding & Development View
📦
senior-qa
81Improve QA Coverage for Web Apps
by alirezarezvani
Modern teams need clear test strategy and practical automation without slowing delivery. This skill helps Claude, Codex, and Claude Code plan tests, review coverage, and scaffold QA workflows.
Coding & Development View
📦
coding-agent-pm
81Manage Coding Agent Workflows
by kiwi-phantomworks
Coding-agent projects can drift when tasks, scope, and checks are vague. This skill gives PM templates and review rules that keep Claude, Codex, and Claude Code work bounded and verifiable.
Coding & Development View