Skills requesting-code-review

📦

requesting-code-review

Name: requesting-code-review
Author: DYAI2025

Content revision r1 Safe ⚙️ External commands

Request Focused Code Reviews Before Merging

Late review feedback can delay releases and hide important defects. This skill guides Claude, Codex, or Claude Code to request structured reviews before work continues.

Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)

📊 75 Adequate

Stop for confirmation before installing.

Review the plan and obtain explicit user consent before changing files.

Install with my Agent

Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.

Agent request

Review the Skillstore skill "requesting-code-review" from https://skillstore.io/skills/dyai2025-requesting-code-review.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/dyai2025-requesting-code-review/manifest. Verify the artifact. Stop and obtain explicit user consent before installing or changing files.

Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.

Agent-readable resources

Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.

Markdown detail GET /skills/dyai2025-requesting-code-review.md Signed manifest GET /api/skills/dyai2025-requesting-code-review/manifest Signed lockfile GET /api/skills/dyai2025-requesting-code-review/lockfile

Test it

Using "requesting-code-review". A developer asks for review after adding a verification function.

Expected outcome:

The review lists strengths, one Important issue about missing progress feedback, one Minor cleanup, and a with-fixes merge assessment.

Using "requesting-code-review". An engineering lead reviews a completed task batch against a plan.

Expected outcome:

The review confirms completed requirements, flags a test coverage gap, recommends a focused fix, and says whether work can continue.

Using "requesting-code-review". A release engineer requests a final pre-merge review.

Expected outcome:

The review checks readiness, highlights any blocking risk, and gives a clear merge decision with short technical reasoning.

Security Audit

Safe

v9 • 7/9/2026 Open versioned report

All static findings were false positives after context review. The shell snippets are visible local git commands for selecting review ranges, and the markdown backticks are formatting. The bundled archive was manually inspected and contains only SKILL.md.

Files scanned

253

Lines analyzed

Review items

False positives ignored

Risk Factors

⚙️ External commands (15)

SKILL.md:27-30 SKILL.md:30-34 SKILL.md:34-37 SKILL.md:37-38 SKILL.md:38-39 SKILL.md:39-40 SKILL.md:40-41 SKILL.md:41-51 SKILL.md:51-75 SKILL.md:28 SKILL.md:29 SKILL.md:56 SKILL.md:57 SKILL.md:27-30 SKILL.md:51-75

No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.

Audited by: codex View Audit History →

Share & cite this report

Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.

Open versioned report

Copy report link

https://skillstore.io/skills/dyai2025-requesting-code-review/audits/9?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/dyai2025-requesting-code-review/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/dyai2025-requesting-code-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/dyai2025-requesting-code-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/dyai2025-requesting-code-review/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Embed card

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/dyai2025-requesting-code-review.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA citation

DYAI2025. (2026). requesting-code-review security audit report (audit version 9) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/dyai2025-requesting-code-review/audits/9

BibTeX citation

@techreport{dyai2025-dyai2025-requesting-code-review-2026,
  author = {DYAI2025},
  title = {requesting-code-review security audit report (audit version 9)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {9},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/dyai2025-requesting-code-review/audits/9},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "requesting-code-review security audit report (audit version 9)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "DYAI2025"
date-released: "2026-07-09"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/dyai2025-requesting-code-review/audits/9"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:dyai2025-requesting-code-review:audit:9"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Compare variants

9 installable variants

Each author remains a separate installable skill. The recommended variant is ranked by Skillstore evidence.

Why this variant is first

Highest Skillstore Score

Author / source Skillstore Score Evidence Confidence Skillstore usage Updated

DMJGilbert Recommended

dmjgilbert-requesting-code-review

Skillstore Score 79

Evidence Confidence High

Skillstore usage 11

Updated

2026-08-21

obra

obra-requesting-code-review

Skillstore Score 78

Evidence Confidence High

Skillstore usage 13

Updated

2026-08-21

Cycleaddict

cycleaddict-requesting-code-review

Skillstore Score 78

Evidence Confidence High

Skillstore usage 12

Updated

2026-08-21

CodingCossack

codingcossack-requesting-code-review

Skillstore Score 78

Evidence Confidence High

Skillstore usage 12

Updated

2026-08-21

sickn33

sickn33-requesting-code-review

Skillstore Score 78

Evidence Confidence High

Skillstore usage 11

Updated

2026-08-21

Cygnusfear

cygnusfear-requesting-code-review

Skillstore Score 78

Evidence Confidence High

Skillstore usage 7

Updated

2026-08-21

davila7

davila7-requesting-code-review

Skillstore Score 78

Evidence Confidence High

Skillstore usage 4

Updated

2026-08-21

DYAI2025 Current

dyai2025-requesting-code-review

Skillstore Score 75

Evidence Confidence Medium

Skillstore usage 8

Updated

2026-08-21

ZhanlinCui

zhanlincui-requesting-code-review

Skillstore Score 70

Evidence Confidence High

Skillstore usage 439

Updated

2026-08-21

Skillstore Score

Why this score Evidence Confidence: Medium

Architecture

Maintainability

Content

Community

Spec Compliance

What You Can Build

Check Feature Completion

Request a review after building a feature to confirm it matches the plan and has enough tests.

Validate Task Batches

Review each completed batch in a larger plan before starting the next batch.

Prepare for Merge

Use the reviewer prompt to find blocking issues before a pull request reaches final approval.

Try These Prompts

Review My Latest Change

Use the requesting-code-review skill to review my latest change. Compare the implementation with the task requirements and report Critical, Important, and Minor issues.

Review a Git Range

Request a code review for the range from BASE_SHA to HEAD_SHA. Check correctness, tests, architecture, and merge readiness.

Review Against a Plan

Use the code-reviewer template to compare the completed work against this plan. Include file references, why each issue matters, and how to fix it.

Gate a Major Merge

Run a production readiness review for this feature branch. Prioritize security, data loss, breaking changes, missing tests, and requirements gaps before giving a merge verdict.

Best Practices

Run the review after each meaningful task or feature, before new work depends on it.
Provide clear requirements, base SHA, head SHA, and a concise implementation summary.
Fix Critical and Important findings before continuing unless you can justify a technical exception.

Avoid

Do not ask for review without giving the reviewer a specific git range or requirement source.
Do not treat style comments as blockers when functional or security issues are absent.
Do not ignore valid review feedback because the change seems small.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill review?

It guides an AI reviewer to compare code changes against requirements, tests, architecture, and production readiness.

Does it run the review automatically?

No. It provides the workflow and prompt structure for Claude, Codex, or Claude Code to request the review.

What inputs should I provide?

Provide what changed, the relevant plan or requirements, the base SHA, the head SHA, and a short description.

Can it replace a pull request review?

No. It is a preparation step that helps find issues before human or team review.

How are issues prioritized?

The template separates findings into Critical, Important, and Minor groups based on actual impact.

Is it useful when I am stuck?

Yes. A focused review can identify missing context, weak tests, or design problems that block progress.

Developer Details

Author

DYAI2025

License

MIT

Skillstore revision

Version notice

The author did not declare a version.

Repository

https://github.com/DYAI2025/Stoppclock-page/tree/main/stoppclock_speckit/.claude/commands/skills/requesting-code-review

Ref

b959ebfd1043a07c0c4378ab94ca4342cb0259f5

Maintenance freshness

7/18/2026

Usage

6 downloads · 279 views

File structure

📄 code-reviewer.md

📄 SKILL.md

📄 SKILL.zip