documentation-and-adrs
Document Decisions and Architecture Clearly
Teams lose context when important technical decisions remain in chat, code comments, or individual memory. This skill turns architectural reasoning, API guidance, project instructions, and release changes into structured documentation.
自分のエージェントでインストール
このリクエストをエージェントにコピーしてください。正規の Skill ページとマニフェストが含まれています。
Review the Skillstore skill "documentation-and-adrs" from https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-documentation-and-adrs.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/addyosmani-documentation-and-adrs/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.エージェントは引き続き計画を提示し、セキュリティポリシーで必要な確認を求める必要があります。
エージェントが読めるリソース
AI エージェント、クローラー、スクリプトがページ全体ではなく整理されたコンテキストを必要とする場合は、これらのリンクを使ってください。
テストする
「documentation-and-adrs」を使用しています。 We chose PostgreSQL over SQLite and MongoDB for a multi-user task application.
期待される結果:
An ADR outline with status, context, relational data requirements, alternatives considered, the PostgreSQL decision, and operational consequences.
「documentation-and-adrs」を使用しています。 Document a task creation endpoint that requires a title and returns an identifier.
期待される結果:
API reference guidance covering the request fields, validation errors, authentication expectations, response details, and a short usage example.
「documentation-and-adrs」を使用しています。 Create onboarding documentation for a project with a development server and test suite.
期待される結果:
- A README structure covering project purpose, setup, commands, architecture, and contribution practices.
- A verification checklist for setup instructions, API documentation, known gotchas, and current agent rules.
セキュリティ監査
安全All 28 external-command detections are Markdown examples or inline command references in SKILL.md, not executable behavior. The environment-file and system-reconnaissance detections also point to documentation examples, and no prompt injection or data-exfiltration intent was found.
リスク要因
⚙️ 外部コマンド (28)
このレポートを共有・引用
バージョン付き評価レポート、中立的なバッジ、埋め込みカード、引用を共有できます。Skillstore は証拠を報告しますが、この Skill が安全かどうかは判断しません。
レポートリンクをコピー
https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-documentation-and-adrs/audits/2?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdownバッジ
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-documentation-and-adrs?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTMLバッジ
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-documentation-and-adrs?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/addyosmani-documentation-and-adrs/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>埋め込みカード
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/addyosmani-documentation-and-adrs.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA形式の引用
addyosmani. (2026). documentation-and-adrs security audit report (audit version 2) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-documentation-and-adrs/audits/2BibTeX形式の引用
@techreport{addyosmani-addyosmani-documentation-and-adrs-2026,
author = {addyosmani},
title = {documentation-and-adrs security audit report (audit version 2)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {2},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-documentation-and-adrs/audits/2},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "documentation-and-adrs security audit report (audit version 2)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "addyosmani"
date-released: "2026-09-19"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-documentation-and-adrs/audits/2"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:addyosmani-documentation-and-adrs:audit:2"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore スコア
このスコアの理由 証拠の信頼度: 高作成できるもの
Record an architecture decision
Create an ADR that compares options, explains trade-offs, records the selected approach, and preserves consequences for future maintainers.
Document a public API
Draft consistent API documentation covering inputs, outputs, errors, authentication expectations, and representative usage guidance.
Improve project onboarding
Build a practical README, changelog structure, and agent guidance so contributors can understand setup, architecture, conventions, and recent changes.
これらのプロンプトを試す
Create a concise ADR for this decision: [decision]. Include context, selected approach, two alternatives, consequences, status, and date. Use clear headings.
Review the repository context I provide and identify its ADR location, file format, numbering pattern, and headings. Then draft an ADR for [decision] that follows those conventions.
Write documentation for this public API: [API details]. Cover parameters, return values, validation, authentication, errors, and one realistic example. State unknowns instead of inventing behavior.
Design a documentation update for [project]. Propose ADRs for durable decisions, README sections for onboarding, API reference coverage, changelog entries, agent guidance, and a verification checklist. Preserve existing conventions and identify missing evidence.
ベストプラクティス
- Provide repository conventions and factual project context before requesting documentation.
- Document the reasoning, constraints, alternatives, and consequences instead of restating implementation details.
- Review every generated command, example, link, and security statement against the current project.
回避
- Do not invent repository conventions, API behavior, commands, or architectural constraints.
- Do not create duplicate ADR numbering schemes or replace established project formats without evidence.
- Do not use documentation as a substitute for implementation, testing, access control, or operational validation.
よくある質問
What does this skill create?
Can it find the correct ADR format?
Does it write files automatically?
Can it validate API behavior?
Who benefits most from this skill?
How should generated documentation be reviewed?
開発者情報
作成者
addyosmaniライセンス
MIT
Skillstore リビジョン
r2
バージョンに関する注意
作者はバージョンを宣言していません。
参照
5d5054f8a23586f9b500fece1cb613a9dffc787b
メンテナンスの新しさ
2026/9/19
利用状況
2 ダウンロード · 0 閲覧
ファイル構成
📄 SKILL.md