技能 interview-me
📦

interview-me

內容修訂 r2 安全 ⚙️ 外部命令

Clarify User Intent Before You Build

Underspecified requests cause teams to build the wrong outcome and discover misalignment late. This skill runs a focused, one-question interview that turns ambiguity into confirmed intent.

支援: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 78 銅級

使用我的智慧代理安裝

將此請求複製給你的智慧代理,其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。

智能體請求
Review the Skillstore skill "interview-me" from https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-interview-me.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/addyosmani-interview-me/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫,並依安全政策請求必要確認。

Agent 可讀資源

當 AI Agent、爬蟲或腳本需要乾淨脈絡、而不是讀取完整頁面時,請使用這些連結。

測試它

正在使用「interview-me」。 Build me a dashboard for our metrics.

預期結果:

Hypothesis: You need a way to track experiment status and early signals. Confidence: about 30 percent because the audience, metrics, and success measure are unclear. Question: Who will use this dashboard?

正在使用「interview-me」。 Make this process more scalable.

預期結果:

Question: If you did not need to justify the decision, what result would you actually want? Guess: You may value faster completion more than broad future flexibility.

正在使用「interview-me」。 I want a handoff document after the interview.

預期結果:

  • Outcome: Track active experiments and their early signals.
  • User: The requester uses it during weekly reviews.
  • Why now: Information is spread across several documents.
  • Success: The requester can find every active experiment in one place.
  • Constraint: Keep the workflow lightweight.
  • Out of scope: Automated reporting and implementation planning.

安全審計

安全
v2 • 2026/9/19 開啟版本化報告

All 24 static findings are false positives. The external-command matches are Markdown backticks, fenced examples, or prose, and the blocker matches describe interview guidance rather than system reconnaissance.

1
已掃描檔案
226
分析行數
0
複核項目
0
已忽略的誤報
最近一次完成的靜態與語意稽核未偵測到已確認的安全發現。這並不能證明該 Skill 沒有副作用。
審計單位: codex 檢視審計紀錄 →
分享與引用此報告

分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據,不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。

開啟版本化報告
安全評估

複製報告連結

https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-interview-me/audits/2?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 徽章

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/addyosmani-interview-me/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-interview-me?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 徽章

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-interview-me?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/addyosmani-interview-me/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

嵌入卡片

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/addyosmani-interview-me.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 引用

addyosmani. (2026). interview-me security audit report (audit version 2) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-interview-me/audits/2

BibTeX 引用

@techreport{addyosmani-addyosmani-interview-me-2026, author = {addyosmani}, title = {interview-me security audit report (audit version 2)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {2}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-interview-me/audits/2}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "interview-me security audit report (audit version 2)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "addyosmani" date-released: "2026-09-19" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-interview-me/audits/2" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:addyosmani-interview-me:audit:2" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore 評分

評分依據 證據置信度: 高
55
架構
85
可維護性
87
內容
67
社群
91
規範符合度

你可以打造什麼

Shape a Product Request

Turn a broad product idea into a confirmed outcome, target user, success measure, and explicit scope boundary.

Clarify an Engineering Task

Expose hidden assumptions before planning or coding, especially when a familiar request could represent several different solutions.

Prepare a Stakeholder Handoff

Capture confirmed intent in the requester’s language so another collaborator can continue with fewer misunderstandings.

試試這些提示

Start an Intent Interview
Interview me about this request one question at a time. State your hypothesis and confidence before the first question.
Challenge My Assumptions
Use interview-me to find assumptions in my request. Probe who benefits, why now, success criteria, constraints, and what is out of scope.
Test the Real Goal
Interview me about this proposed solution. Treat the solution as a hypothesis and identify the underlying problem before accepting the requested artifact.
Confirm and Handoff Intent
Run a one-question interview until you can predict my next three answers. Restate the confirmed intent with outcome, user, why now, success, constraint, and out of scope.

最佳實務

  • Start with a defensible hypothesis and state what remains unknown.
  • Ask one focused question at a time, with a reasoned guess attached.
  • Require explicit confirmation of the concrete restatement before handing off.

避免

  • Do not batch several discovery questions into one message.
  • Do not accept vague agreement or delegation as explicit confirmation.
  • Do not create a plan or specification before intent is confirmed.

常見問題

When should I use this skill?
Use it when a request is underspecified, conventional, or likely to hide competing priorities.
How many questions will it ask?
It asks only as many focused questions as needed to reach shared understanding.
Can it interview users in batch mode?
No. It requires a live, responsive interaction and asks one question at a time.
What does the final output contain?
The final output is a confirmed intent statement covering outcome, user, timing, success, constraints, and scope exclusions.
Does it write a project plan?
No. It clarifies intent first, then supports a handoff to planning or specification skills.
What happens when I say whatever you think?
The skill treats that response as delegation and asks concrete alternatives instead of treating it as a decision.

開發者詳細資訊

作者

addyosmani

授權

MIT

Skillstore 修訂

r2

版本提示

作者未聲明版本。

引用

5d5054f8a23586f9b500fece1cb613a9dffc787b

維護新鮮度

2026/9/19

使用量

11 次下載 · 1 次瀏覽

檔案結構

📄 SKILL.md

addyosmani 的更多技能

查看全部
查看全部