技能 interview-me
📦

interview-me

内容修订 r2 安全 ⚙️ 外部命令

Clarify User Intent Before You Build

Underspecified requests cause teams to build the wrong outcome and discover misalignment late. This skill runs a focused, one-question interview that turns ambiguity into confirmed intent.

支持: Claude Codex Code(CC)
🥉 78 青铜

使用我的智能体安装

将此请求复制给你的智能体,其中包含权威 Skill 页面和清单。

智能体请求
Review the Skillstore skill "interview-me" from https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-interview-me.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/addyosmani-interview-me/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

你的智能体仍应展示其计划,并按安全策略请求必要确认。

Agent 可读资源

当 AI Agent、爬虫或脚本需要干净上下文,而不是读取完整页面时,请使用这些链接。

测试它

正在使用“interview-me”。 Build me a dashboard for our metrics.

预期结果:

Hypothesis: You need a way to track experiment status and early signals. Confidence: about 30 percent because the audience, metrics, and success measure are unclear. Question: Who will use this dashboard?

正在使用“interview-me”。 Make this process more scalable.

预期结果:

Question: If you did not need to justify the decision, what result would you actually want? Guess: You may value faster completion more than broad future flexibility.

正在使用“interview-me”。 I want a handoff document after the interview.

预期结果:

  • Outcome: Track active experiments and their early signals.
  • User: The requester uses it during weekly reviews.
  • Why now: Information is spread across several documents.
  • Success: The requester can find every active experiment in one place.
  • Constraint: Keep the workflow lightweight.
  • Out of scope: Automated reporting and implementation planning.

安全审计

安全
v2 • 2026/9/19 打开版本化报告

All 24 static findings are false positives. The external-command matches are Markdown backticks, fenced examples, or prose, and the blocker matches describe interview guidance rather than system reconnaissance.

1
已扫描文件
226
分析行数
0
复核项
0
已忽略误报
最新一次完成的静态与语义审计未检测到已确认的安全发现。这并不能证明该 Skill 没有副作用。
审计者: codex 查看审计历史 →
分享与引用此报告

分享版本化评估报告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片和引用。Skillstore 只报告证据,不判断该 Skill 是否安全。

打开版本化报告
安全评估

复制报告链接

https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-interview-me/audits/2?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 徽章

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/addyosmani-interview-me/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-interview-me?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 徽章

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-interview-me?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/addyosmani-interview-me/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

嵌入卡片

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/addyosmani-interview-me.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
学术引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 引用

addyosmani. (2026). interview-me security audit report (audit version 2) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-interview-me/audits/2

BibTeX 引用

@techreport{addyosmani-addyosmani-interview-me-2026, author = {addyosmani}, title = {interview-me security audit report (audit version 2)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {2}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-interview-me/audits/2}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "interview-me security audit report (audit version 2)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "addyosmani" date-released: "2026-09-19" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-interview-me/audits/2" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:addyosmani-interview-me:audit:2" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore 评分

评分依据 证据置信度: 高
55
架构
85
可维护性
87
内容
67
社区
91
规范符合性

你能构建什么

Shape a Product Request

Turn a broad product idea into a confirmed outcome, target user, success measure, and explicit scope boundary.

Clarify an Engineering Task

Expose hidden assumptions before planning or coding, especially when a familiar request could represent several different solutions.

Prepare a Stakeholder Handoff

Capture confirmed intent in the requester’s language so another collaborator can continue with fewer misunderstandings.

试试这些提示

Start an Intent Interview
Interview me about this request one question at a time. State your hypothesis and confidence before the first question.
Challenge My Assumptions
Use interview-me to find assumptions in my request. Probe who benefits, why now, success criteria, constraints, and what is out of scope.
Test the Real Goal
Interview me about this proposed solution. Treat the solution as a hypothesis and identify the underlying problem before accepting the requested artifact.
Confirm and Handoff Intent
Run a one-question interview until you can predict my next three answers. Restate the confirmed intent with outcome, user, why now, success, constraint, and out of scope.

最佳实践

  • Start with a defensible hypothesis and state what remains unknown.
  • Ask one focused question at a time, with a reasoned guess attached.
  • Require explicit confirmation of the concrete restatement before handing off.

避免

  • Do not batch several discovery questions into one message.
  • Do not accept vague agreement or delegation as explicit confirmation.
  • Do not create a plan or specification before intent is confirmed.

常见问题

When should I use this skill?
Use it when a request is underspecified, conventional, or likely to hide competing priorities.
How many questions will it ask?
It asks only as many focused questions as needed to reach shared understanding.
Can it interview users in batch mode?
No. It requires a live, responsive interaction and asks one question at a time.
What does the final output contain?
The final output is a confirmed intent statement covering outcome, user, timing, success, constraints, and scope exclusions.
Does it write a project plan?
No. It clarifies intent first, then supports a handoff to planning or specification skills.
What happens when I say whatever you think?
The skill treats that response as delegation and asks concrete alternatives instead of treating it as a decision.

开发者详情

作者

addyosmani

许可证

MIT

Skillstore 修订

r2

版本提示

作者未声明版本。

引用

5d5054f8a23586f9b500fece1cb613a9dffc787b

维护新鲜度

2026/9/19

使用量

11 次下载 · 0 次浏览

文件结构

📄 SKILL.md