Skills research-grants

📦

research-grants

Name: research-grants
Author: davila7

Content revision r2 Safe ⚙️ External commands

Build Stronger Federal Research Grant Proposals

Researchers must align complex proposals with agency criteria, structure, and submission rules. This skill guides drafts for NSF, NIH, DOE, and DARPA applications.

Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥈 82 Silver

Install with my Agent

Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.

Agent request

Review the Skillstore skill "research-grants" from https://skillstore.io/skills/davila7-research-grants.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/davila7-research-grants/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.

Agent-readable resources

Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.

Markdown detail GET /skills/davila7-research-grants.md Signed manifest GET /api/skills/davila7-research-grants/manifest Signed lockfile GET /api/skills/davila7-research-grants/lockfile

Test it

Using "research-grants". Outline an NSF project summary for a five-year climate resilience study.

Expected outcome:

A one-page structure with separate overview, intellectual merit, and broader impacts sections, followed by missing evidence and metrics.

Using "research-grants". Strengthen three NIH aims about treatment resistance.

Expected outcome:

Revised action-oriented aims with rationale, hypotheses, expected outcomes, dependencies, feasibility concerns, and alternative approaches.

Using "research-grants". Review a DARPA technical narrative for milestone quality.

Expected outcome:

A prioritized review covering measurable thresholds, phase gates, transition plans, technical risks, deliverables, and budget alignment.

Security Audit

Safe

v9 • 7/23/2026 Open versioned report

All 71 static findings are false positives. The reconnaissance alerts match ordinary grant-writing prose, while command alerts match Markdown fences and inline file references. No prompt injection, exfiltration intent, or malicious execution behavior was found.

Files scanned

5,435

Lines analyzed

Review items

False positives ignored

No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.

Audited by: codex View Audit History →

Share & cite this report

Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.

Open versioned report

Copy report link

https://skillstore.io/skills/davila7-research-grants/audits/9?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/davila7-research-grants/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/davila7-research-grants?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/davila7-research-grants?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/davila7-research-grants/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Embed card

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/davila7-research-grants.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA citation

davila7. (2026). research-grants security audit report (audit version 9) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/davila7-research-grants/audits/9

BibTeX citation

@techreport{davila7-davila7-research-grants-2026,
  author = {davila7},
  title = {research-grants security audit report (audit version 9)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {9},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/davila7-research-grants/audits/9},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "research-grants security audit report (audit version 9)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "davila7"
date-released: "2026-07-23"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/davila7-research-grants/audits/9"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:davila7-research-grants:audit:9"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Compare variants

2 installable variants

Each author remains a separate installable skill. The recommended variant is ranked by Skillstore evidence.

Why this variant is first

Highest Skillstore Score

Author / source Skillstore Score Evidence Confidence Skillstore usage Updated

davila7 Recommended Current

davila7-research-grants

Skillstore Score 82

Evidence Confidence High

Skillstore usage 15

Updated

2026-08-21

K-Dense-AI

k-dense-ai-research-grants

Skillstore Score 69

Evidence Confidence High

Skillstore usage 17

Updated

2026-08-21

Skillstore Score

Why this score Evidence Confidence: High

Architecture

Maintainability

Content

Community

Spec Compliance

What You Can Build

Develop a New Proposal

Create a structured first draft that aligns the research plan with agency review criteria.

Review Application Readiness

Check narrative coverage, budget alignment, milestones, and required proposal sections before institutional review.

Strengthen an Early Draft

Turn research ideas into focused aims, significance statements, methods, and measurable outcomes.

Try These Prompts

Outline a Grant Section

Create an outline for my [agency] [section]. My topic is [topic], my objective is [objective], and my audience is [review panel].

Draft NIH Specific Aims

Draft an NIH specific aims page from this problem, knowledge gap, hypothesis, preliminary evidence, and three proposed aims: [details]. Mark unsupported claims.

Build an NSF Narrative

Develop an NSF proposal structure for [solicitation]. Connect objectives, methods, intellectual merit, broader impacts, milestones, team roles, and budget needs.

Run a Mock Agency Review

Review this [agency] draft against the attached solicitation and scoring criteria. Identify compliance gaps, weak evidence, feasibility risks, and prioritized revisions.

Best Practices

Provide the current solicitation, mechanism, deadline, page limits, and review criteria with each request.
Separate verified facts from assumptions, and replace every placeholder before institutional review.
Ask scientific, budget, compliance, and sponsored-research reviewers to validate the final application.

Avoid

Do not treat general agency guidance as a substitute for the current funding announcement.
Do not invent preliminary data, citations, collaborators, facilities, approvals, or budget rates.
Do not submit generated text without checking consistency across aims, methods, timeline, team, and budget.