Evaluate Code Review Feedback
Code review feedback can be unclear, incorrect, or incomplete. This skill helps Claude, Codex, and Claude Code verify suggestions, ask precise questions, and implement reviewed changes carefully.
Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.
Review the Skillstore skill "receiving-code-review" from https://skillstore.io/skills/obra-receiving-code-review.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/obra-receiving-code-review/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.
Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.
Using "receiving-code-review". Reviewer asks to remove legacy support, but platform requirements are unclear.
Expected outcome:
The skill would verify supported platforms, identify the compatibility risk, and ask whether to fix the legacy path or drop support.
Using "receiving-code-review". A review contains six requested fixes, and two are ambiguous.
Expected outcome:
The skill would pause implementation, list understood items, and request clarification on the ambiguous items before editing.
Using "receiving-code-review". Reviewer suggests adding a broad feature that no current code appears to call.
Expected outcome:
The skill would check real usage, note the unused path, and ask whether to remove it or confirm a hidden requirement.
All static findings are false positives from Markdown code fences or ordinary prose. The skill provides code review communication guidance and does not include executable shell, Ruby backtick, or network reconnaissance behavior. No prompt injection, credential exfiltration, or malicious intent was found in SKILL.md.
Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.
https://skillstore.io/skills/obra-receiving-code-review/audits/8?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report[](https://skillstore.io/skills/obra-receiving-code-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge)<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/obra-receiving-code-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/obra-receiving-code-review/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a><iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/obra-receiving-code-review.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>obra. (2026). receiving-code-review security audit report (audit version 8) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/obra-receiving-code-review/audits/8@techreport{obra-obra-receiving-code-review-2026,
author = {obra},
title = {receiving-code-review security audit report (audit version 8)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {8},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/obra-receiving-code-review/audits/8},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "receiving-code-review security audit report (audit version 8)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "obra"
date-released: "2026-07-06"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/obra-receiving-code-review/audits/8"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:obra-receiving-code-review:audit:8"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Each author remains a separate installable skill. The recommended variant is ranked by Skillstore evidence.
Why this variant is first
sickn33-receiving-code-review
2026-09-09
codingcossack-receiving-code-review
2026-09-09
zhanlincui-receiving-code-review
2026-09-09
obra-receiving-code-review
2026-09-09
cycleaddict-receiving-code-review
2026-09-09
davila7-receiving-code-review
2026-09-09
cygnusfear-receiving-code-review
2026-09-09
dyai2025-receiving-code-review
2026-09-09
Evaluate whether outside reviewer suggestions fit the current codebase before accepting them.
Help an AI coding assistant clarify feedback and implement valid changes one item at a time.
Encourage concise technical replies instead of performative agreement or unsupported pushback.
Review this feedback and restate what needs to change before editing. Ask questions if anything is unclear.
Evaluate each review comment against the current codebase. Identify which items are valid, unclear, or need pushback.
Implement the valid review feedback one item at a time. After each item, explain the change and test result.
Assess this complex PR review for conflicts with existing architecture, platform support, and YAGNI. Propose a response plan before changes.
Author
obraLicense
MIT
Skillstore revision
r1
Version notice
The author did not declare a version.
Ref
e397ce5a135369cd6def89cb6400d013e2f68f2f
Maintenance freshness
7/18/2026
Usage
21 downloads · 360 views
File structure
📄 SKILL.md
Create Detailed Implementation Plans
Complex work is risky when requirements are not broken into clear steps. This skill turns specs into test-focused implementation plans for Claude, Codex, and Claude Code.
Build Tested AI Skills
AI skills can fail when instructions are vague or untested. This skill guides test-driven skill writing with pressure scenarios and verification loops.
Execute Implementation Plans with Checkpoints
Implementation plans can lose focus when work moves into a separate AI session. This skill guides Claude, Codex, and Claude Code through batch execution, verification, and review checkpoints.
Plan Features Through Guided Brainstorming
Feature ideas often move to implementation before goals and constraints are clear. This skill guides Claude, Codex, and Claude Code through questions, trade-offs, and validated design notes.
Execute Plans with Subagent Reviews
Complex implementation plans lose quality when one context handles every task. This skill coordinates fresh subagents for implementation, spec checks, and code quality reviews.
Request Code Reviews Before Merge
Unreviewed changes can ship bugs, regressions, or incomplete requirements. This skill guides Claude, Codex, and Claude Code to request structured review before merge.
Audit NestJS Code with Evidence-Backed Findings
by amirtaherkhani
NestJS repositories can hide boundary flaws and runtime risks that lint results alone cannot reveal. This skill combines local evidence collection and semantic review into one prioritized report.
Review Code with Structured Quality Checks
by alirezarezvani
Code reviews can miss quality, security, and maintainability issues. This skill guides structured reviews with scripts, checklists, and report generation.
Manage Coding Agent Workflows
by kiwi-phantomworks
Coding-agent projects can drift when tasks, scope, and checks are vague. This skill gives PM templates and review rules that keep Claude, Codex, and Claude Code work bounded and verifiable.
Create Verifiable Agent Loop Specs
by zhangzeyu99-web
Vague coding-agent tasks drift, repeat work, and report success without evidence. Ariadne Loop turns them into bounded loop specs with verifiers, stop rules, and human gates.
Review Code for Bugs and Security Issues
by 21pounder
Code reviews can miss bugs, security flaws, and maintainability issues. This skill guides Claude, Codex, and Claude Code through structured review steps.
Review GitHub Pull Requests with CLI Utilities
by Bind
Pull request reviews require repeated eligibility checks, guideline discovery, and precise feedback. This skill documents a consistent CLI workflow for those tasks.