receiving-code-review
Evaluate code review feedback with technical rigor
Também disponível em: obra,DYAI2025,Cycleaddict,davila7,CodingCossack
Code review feedback often requires verification before implementation. This skill ensures Claude evaluates suggestions technically, asks clarifying questions when needed, and pushes back when feedback is incorrect or unclear.
Baixar o ZIP da skill
Upload no Claude
Vá em Configurações → Capacidades → Skills → Upload skill
Ative e comece a usar
Testar
A utilizar "receiving-code-review". Reviewer suggests removing legacy code and adding proper metrics tracking with database, date filters, and CSV export
Resultado esperado:
- Suggestion requires YAGNI check - grep codebase for actual usage
- Current implementation: endpoint exists but is unused
- Recommended response: 'This endpoint has no callers. Remove it (YAGNI)? Or is there usage I'm missing?'
- Do not implement database metrics until actual use cases are identified
A utilizar "receiving-code-review". Code review feedback says: Fix items 1-6, but I only understand 1, 2, 3, and 6. Items 4 and 5 are unclear.
Resultado esperado:
- Do NOT implement items 1, 2, 3, 6 yet - unclear items may be related
- Request clarification on items 4 and 5 before proceeding
- Recommended response: 'I understand items 1, 2, 3, 6. Need clarification on 4 and 5 before implementing.'
Auditoria de Segurança
SeguroThis skill contains only markdown documentation with behavioral guidelines for code review response patterns. No executable code, no file system access, no network calls, no command execution. All 33 static findings are FALSE POSITIVES caused by the scanner misidentifying markdown syntax and plain text as security-relevant patterns.
Fatores de risco
🌐 Acesso à rede (1)
⚙️ Comandos externos (23)
Pontuação de qualidade
O Que Você Pode Construir
Verify review suggestions
Evaluate external code review feedback before implementation to prevent introducing bugs or regressions
Maintain code quality
Ensure code review feedback is technically sound and appropriate for the specific codebase context
Improve code review process
Establish consistent standards for evaluating and responding to code review feedback
Tente Estes Prompts
Use the receiving-code-review skill to evaluate this suggestion: [paste feedback]. Check if it is technically correct, breaks existing functionality, or conflicts with project decisions.
I received code review feedback but do not fully understand some items. Use receiving-code-review to help me identify what needs clarification and how to ask effectively.
I believe a code review suggestion is technically incorrect. Use receiving-code-review to help me construct a technical, evidence-based pushback response.
I want to implement code review feedback but need to verify it first. Use receiving-code-review to guide me through the verification checklist.
Melhores Práticas
- Always verify code review feedback against the actual codebase before implementation
- Ask clarifying questions when any item is unclear rather than guessing
- Use technical reasoning when pushing back, not defensiveness or apologies
Evitar
- Performative agreement like 'You're absolutely right!' or 'Great point!'
- Blind implementation of suggestions without technical verification
- Batch implementing multiple items without testing each one individually
Perguntas Frequentes
What AI tools support this skill?
Does this skill execute code changes?
How is this different from normal Claude behavior?
What data does this skill access?
What if feedback seems correct but I cannot verify it?
How does this compare to a linter or code analyzer?
Detalhes do Desenvolvedor
Estrutura de arquivos
📄 SKILL.md