📦

w-retro

Name: w-retro
Author: blockmatic

Ревизия содержимого r1 Безопасно

Review Completed Work and Improve Next Time

Teams often finish tasks without recording what changed, what evidence was missing, or what should improve. This skill produces a concise, task-specific retrospective with up to three practical next steps.

Поддерживает: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 78 Бронза

Установить с помощью моего Агента

Скопируйте этот запрос в своего Агента. Он содержит каноническую страницу Skill и манифест.

Запрос агента

Review the Skillstore skill "w-retro" from https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Ваш Агент по-прежнему должен показать план и запросить все подтверждения, требуемые политикой безопасности.

Ресурсы для AI-агентов

Используйте эти ссылки, когда AI-агенту, crawler или script нужен чистый контекст вместо полной страницы.

Markdown-детали GET /skills/blockmatic-w-retro.md Подписанный manifest GET /api/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/manifest Подписанный lockfile GET /api/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/lockfile

Протестировать

Использование «w-retro». We needed to add export filtering. The filter shipped and unit tests passed, but no browser test was run.

Ожидаемый результат:

Requested versus shipped: Export filtering was added and unit-tested. Evidence gap: Browser behavior was not checked. Next change: Add one browser test for filter selection and downloaded results.

Использование «w-retro». The task was to update the onboarding guide. The guide changed, but the examples were not checked against the current interface.

Ожидаемый результат:

Requested versus shipped: The onboarding guide was updated, but example accuracy was not verified.
Process gap: The task lacked a user-interface consistency check.
Next changes: Review examples against the current interface and add a lightweight documentation checklist.

Аудит безопасности

Безопасно

v1 • 20.09.2026 Открыть версионный отчет

The scanned skill is a 12-line, chat-only retrospective checklist with no executable code or detected security patterns. No prompt-injection, data-exfiltration, or business-logic abuse evidence was found in SKILL.md.

Просканировано файлов

Проанализировано строк

Пункты проверки

Ложные срабатывания проигнорированы

Последний завершенный статический и семантический аудит не обнаружил подтвержденных проблем безопасности. Это не доказывает отсутствие побочных эффектов у навыка.

Аудитор:: codex

Поделиться и цитировать этот отчет

Делитесь версионным отчетом об оценке, нейтральным значком, встраиваемой карточкой и цитатами. Skillstore публикует доказательства, не решая, безопасен ли этот Skill.

Открыть версионный отчет

Копировать ссылку на отчёт

https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Значок Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

Значок HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Встраиваемая карточка

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/blockmatic-w-retro.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Академические ссылки (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

Цитата APA

blockmatic. (2026). w-retro security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/audits/1

Цитата BibTeX

@techreport{blockmatic-blockmatic-w-retro-2026,
  author = {blockmatic},
  title = {w-retro security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "w-retro security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "blockmatic"
date-released: "2026-09-20"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-retro/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:blockmatic-w-retro:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Оценка Skillstore

Почему такая оценка Достоверность доказательств: Средний

Архитектура

Сопровождаемость

Контент

Сообщество

Соответствие спецификации

Что вы можете построить

Close a development task

Review the request, shipped changes, checks, and documentation before closing a coding task.

Improve team delivery

Capture specific process gaps after a sprint item, project milestone, or cross-functional deliverable.

Evaluate an AI-assisted workflow

Compare the requested work with the AI-produced result and record better checks for the next session.

Попробуйте эти промпты

Basic task retrospective

Review the completed task in this conversation. State what was requested, what shipped, and one improvement for next time.

Check process gaps

Run a retrospective on this completed task. Identify skipped checks, unclear requirements, extra scope, and missing documentation. Suggest no more than three specific changes.

Compare plan and outcome

Compare the original request, plan, implementation, and validation evidence. Explain the most important differences and recommend up to three changes for the next similar task.

Audit an AI-assisted delivery

Perform a task-specific retrospective of this AI-assisted delivery. Separate outcome gaps from process gaps, cite the available evidence, and prioritize three changes that would improve the next session.

Лучшие практики

Run the skill after checks are complete and the delivered result is known.
Provide the original request, completed work, validation evidence, and relevant constraints.
Prefer specific recommendations tied to this task over broad process advice.

Избегать

Do not use the retrospective as a substitute for implementing a required fix.
Do not request generic lessons without sharing task-specific evidence.
Do not turn a short retrospective into an unfocused list of every possible improvement.

Часто задаваемые вопросы

When should I use this skill?

Use it after completing a task and recording the checks or evidence that support the result.

What does the skill review?

It compares the request with the shipped result and checks for process or evidence gaps.

How many improvements does it suggest?

It suggests at most three concrete changes for the next similar task.

Can it change files or create commits?

No. It responds in chat and does not implement changes, commit files, or open pull requests.

What context produces the best result?

Include the request, plan, completed work, validation checks, constraints, and known uncertainties.

Does it replace a formal incident review?

No. It supports routine task learning and does not replace incident, compliance, or security review processes.

Сведения для разработчиков

Автор

blockmatic

Лицензия

MIT

Ревизия Skillstore

Примечание о версии

Автор не указал версию.

Репозиторий

https://github.com/blockmatic/basilic-skills/tree/5fa16493413923e31f1df31f7260224f0f291d9e/skills/w-retro

Ссылка

7cd60e5c44d39477abb7a2c00ae0de2cf2a01392

Актуальность поддержки

20.09.2026

Использование

0 загрузок · 0 просмотров

Структура файлов

📄 SKILL.md