Навыки gpt-series-reasoning-style

📦

gpt-series-reasoning-style

Name: gpt-series-reasoning-style
Author: jadeyingwah

v1.6.0 Ревизия содержимого r6 Безопасно 🌐 Доступ к сети📁 Доступ к файловой системе⚙️ Внешние команды

Verify AI Deliverables with Evidence

AI work can appear complete before the result is opened, tested, or checked against the request. This skill adds staged planning, real-environment verification, and honest completion levels.

Поддерживает: Claude Codex Code(CC)

💎 90 Избранное

Установить с помощью моего Агента

Скопируйте этот запрос в своего Агента. Он содержит каноническую страницу Skill и манифест.

Запрос агента

Review the Skillstore skill "gpt-series-reasoning-style" from https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Ваш Агент по-прежнему должен показать план и запросить все подтверждения, требуемые политикой безопасности.

Ресурсы для AI-агентов

Используйте эти ссылки, когда AI-агенту, crawler или script нужен чистый контекст вместо полной страницы.

Markdown-детали GET /skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style.md Подписанный manifest GET /api/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/manifest Подписанный lockfile GET /api/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/lockfile

Протестировать

Использование «gpt-series-reasoning-style». Build a small dashboard and tell me when it is finished.

Ожидаемый результат:

The dashboard is implemented. I opened it in the target environment, checked the main interaction, and verified the displayed totals. Mobile layout and external data refresh remain unverified.

Использование «gpt-series-reasoning-style». Have two agents research and implement this feature.

Ожидаемый результат:

Research agent: documented assumptions and acceptance checks.
Implementation agent: completed the feature and supplied the changed files.
Review: opened the integrated result and checked the critical path.
Status: C1 verified; stakeholder approval is still required for C2.

Использование «gpt-series-reasoning-style». Confirm that this report is correct.

Ожидаемый результат:

The report matches the requested structure and its key figures were recalculated. Source freshness and business acceptance were not independently verified.

Аудит безопасности

Безопасно

v6 • 20.09.2026 Открыть версионный отчет

All 91 static findings were adjudicated as false positives because they reference public metadata, documentation, fixed repository paths, or analysis heuristics rather than executed behavior. No prompt-injection text, data-exfiltration intent, or runtime command execution was evidenced in the reviewed files.

Просканировано файлов

2,119

Проанализировано строк

Пункты проверки

Ложные срабатывания проигнорированы

Факторы риска

🌐 Доступ к сети (12)

.claude-plugin/plugin.json:7 .claude-plugin/plugin.json:8 plugin.json:7 plugin.json:8 README.md:374 README.md:382 README.md:397 README.md:774 README.md:782 README.md:797 REFERENCE.md:308 REFERENCE.md:314

📁 Доступ к файловой системе (41)

⚙️ Внешние команды (16)

README.md:379 README.md:381 README.md:779 README.md:781 REFERENCE.md:312 REFERENCE.md:313 scripts/selfcheck.py:9-76 scripts/selfcheck.py:76-77 scripts/selfcheck.py:77 SKILL.md:17 SKILL.md:23 SKILL.md:24 SKILL.md:30 SKILL.md:31 SKILL.md:32 SKILL.md:33

Последний завершенный статический и семантический аудит не обнаружил подтвержденных проблем безопасности. Это не доказывает отсутствие побочных эффектов у навыка.

Аудитор:: codex Посмотреть историю аудитов →

Поделиться и цитировать этот отчет

Делитесь версионным отчетом об оценке, нейтральным значком, встраиваемой карточкой и цитатами. Skillstore публикует доказательства, не решая, безопасен ли этот Skill.

Открыть версионный отчет

Копировать ссылку на отчёт

https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/audits/6?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Значок Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

Значок HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Встраиваемая карточка

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Академические ссылки (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

Цитата APA

jadeyingwah. (2026). gpt-series-reasoning-style security audit report (audit version 6) [Author version 1.6.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/audits/6

Цитата BibTeX

@techreport{jadeyingwah-jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style-2026,
  author = {jadeyingwah},
  title = {gpt-series-reasoning-style security audit report (audit version 6)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {6},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/audits/6},
  note = {Author version 1.6.0}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "gpt-series-reasoning-style security audit report (audit version 6)"
version: "1.6.0"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "jadeyingwah"
date-released: "2026-09-20"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style/audits/6"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:jadeyingwah-gpt-series-reasoning-style:audit:6"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Оценка Skillstore

Почему такая оценка Достоверность доказательств: Средний

Архитектура

100

Сопровождаемость

Контент

Сообщество

Соответствие спецификации

Что вы можете построить

Review a Code Change

Ask an engineer or coding agent to implement a change, run focused checks, open the result, and report verified and unverified paths.

Coordinate Multiple Agents

Use staged planning and explicit handoffs when several agents divide research, implementation, testing, or review.

Validate a Client Deliverable

Track whether a document, design, or analysis matches the request and distinguish technical completion from stakeholder approval.

Попробуйте эти промпты

Basic Completion Check

Complete this task, then open the actual result and list what you verified, what remains unverified, and whether the request is complete.

Plan Before Implementation

Plan this task in clear stages. Identify the required checks and the real environment where the final result must be opened before you implement it.

Audit a Finished Change

Review this completed change against the original request. Recalculate important numbers, open the output, test the critical path, and mark every unverified claim.

Coordinate an Agent Team

Break this project into independent agent roles. Define handoff evidence, assign a reviewer, verify the integrated result in its real environment, and report the appropriate C1 or C2 status.