스킬 research

📦

research

Name: research
Author: warpdotdev

콘텐츠 리비전 r1 안전 ⚙️ 외부 명령어

Delegate Broad Codebase Research

Large investigations can flood the primary agent context with irrelevant files and logs. This skill delegates read-only research and returns concise conclusions with cited evidence.

지원: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 77 브론즈

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 77 브론즈

내 에이전트로 설치

이 요청을 에이전트에 복사하세요. 공식 Skill 페이지와 매니페스트가 포함되어 있습니다.

에이전트 요청

Review the Skillstore skill "research" from https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-research.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/warpdotdev-research/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

에이전트는 계속해서 계획을 표시하고 보안 정책에서 요구하는 확인을 요청해야 합니다.

에이전트가 읽기 쉬운 리소스

AI 에이전트, 크롤러, 스크립트가 전체 페이지 대신 정리된 컨텍스트만 필요할 때 이 링크를 사용하세요.

Markdown 상세 GET /skills/warpdotdev-research.md 서명된 manifest GET /api/skills/warpdotdev-research/manifest 서명된 lockfile GET /api/skills/warpdotdev-research/lockfile

테스트해 보기

"research" 사용 중입니다. Find the root cause of this failing integration test and cite the relevant implementation and test locations.

예상 결과:

Root cause: The retry handler converts the timeout into a permanent failure.
Evidence: The report identifies the handler and failing test locations.
Caveat: External service behavior was not reproduced locally.

"research" 사용 중입니다. Summarize this large pull request, including behavior changes, risks, and test coverage.

예상 결과:

Change: The request pipeline now validates credentials before loading account data.
Risk: Existing clients with incomplete credentials may fail earlier.
Coverage: Unit tests cover validation, but migration behavior remains untested.

"research" 사용 중입니다. Explain how session recovery works across the repository and identify the main call sites.

예상 결과:

Flow: Recovery starts after connection loss, restores persisted state, and reconnects active sessions.
Evidence: The summary lists the coordinator, persistence layer, and reconnect entry points.
Unknown: Concurrent recovery behavior requires runtime verification.

보안 감사

안전

v1 • 2026. 9. 4. 버전별 보고서 열기

All five static findings are false positives. Four are Markdown inline-code spans, while line 36 discusses subagent costs without performing reconnaissance. No prompt injection, command execution, or semantic security issue was found.

스캔된 파일

분석된 줄 수

검토 항목

오탐 무시됨

위험 요인

⚙️ 외부 명령어 (4)

SKILL.md:27 SKILL.md:33 SKILL.md:44 SKILL.md:64

가장 최근에 완료된 정적·의미론적 감사에서 확인된 보안 발견 사항이 감지되지 않았습니다. 이는 스킬에 부작용이 없음을 증명하지 않습니다.

감사자: codex

이 보고서 공유 및 인용

버전이 지정된 평가 보고서, 중립 배지, 임베드 카드 및 인용을 공유하세요. Skillstore는 근거를 보고하지만 이 Skill의 안전 여부를 판단하지 않습니다.

버전별 보고서 열기

보고서 링크 복사

https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-research/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 배지

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/warpdotdev-research/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-research?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 배지

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-research?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/warpdotdev-research/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

임베드 카드

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/warpdotdev-research.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

학술 인용 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 인용

warpdotdev. (2026). research security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-research/audits/1

BibTeX 인용

@techreport{warpdotdev-warpdotdev-research-2026,
  author = {warpdotdev},
  title = {research security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-research/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "research security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "warpdotdev"
date-released: "2026-09-04"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-research/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:warpdotdev-research:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

변형 비교

설치 가능한 변형 2개

각 작성자의 스킬은 별도의 설치 항목으로 유지됩니다. 추천 변형은 Skillstore 근거로 순위가 정해집니다.

이 변형이 1위인 이유

Skillstore 사용량이 더 높음

작성자 / 소스 Skillstore 점수 증거 신뢰도 Skillstore 사용량 업데이트됨

mattpocock 권장

mattpocock-research

Skillstore 점수 77

증거 신뢰도 중간

Skillstore 사용량 14

업데이트됨

2026-09-09

warpdotdev 현재

warpdotdev-research

Skillstore 점수 77

증거 신뢰도 중간

Skillstore 사용량 8

업데이트됨

2026-09-09

Skillstore 점수

이 점수의 이유 증거 신뢰도: 중간

아키텍처

유지보수성

콘텐츠

커뮤니티

사양 준수

만들 수 있는 것

Trace a complex test failure

Delegate inspection of long CI logs and related code, then receive the likely cause with supporting locations.

Summarize a large pull request

Review a substantial diff through a subagent and receive the main changes, rationale, risks, and evidence.

Survey an unfamiliar architecture

Map how a component or API is used across a repository without loading every inspected file into primary context.

이 프롬프트를 사용해 보세요

Answer a repository question

Investigate {question} in {repository_path}. Work read-only. Return a concise answer with exact file paths, symbols, and important caveats.

Diagnose a failure

Analyze {log_or_test_failure} and trace the relevant code. Identify the root cause, cite supporting locations, and note anything not verified.

Review a large change

Research {pull_request_or_diff}. Summarize behavioral changes, affected components, design rationale, risks, and tests. Support each major conclusion with file locations.

Coordinate independent investigations

Investigate these independent areas in parallel: {area_one}, {area_two}, and {area_three}. Synthesize the results, preserve evidence, and identify cross-area uncertainties.

모범 사례

Provide an exact question, repository path, and suspected files or symbols.
Keep investigations read-only unless the task explicitly requires changes.
Request concise conclusions, exact evidence locations, caveats, and unresolved questions.

피하기

Do not delegate a single lookup or a few known file reads.
Do not delegate when the primary agent must edit the same files immediately.
Do not split one coherent investigation into artificial parallel tasks.

자주 묻는 질문

When should I use this skill?

Use it when investigation requires many files, long logs, large diffs, or broad repository surveys.

When should I inspect files directly?

Inspect files directly for small lookups or when you need their contents for immediate edits.

Does the skill modify repository files?

The workflow is read-only by default. A task must explicitly request changes before a subagent should modify files.

Can it run several investigations at once?

Yes. Parallel subagents are appropriate only when the questions are independent and do not require shared intermediate findings.

What should a research report include?

It should include a direct answer, exact evidence locations, relevant symbols, caveats, and unresolved questions.

Which AI tools support this skill?

The report declares support for Claude, Codex, and Claude Code. Local subagent availability still depends on the host environment.

개발자 세부 정보

작성자

warpdotdev

라이선스

MIT

Skillstore 리비전

버전 안내

작성자가 버전을 선언하지 않았습니다.

리포지토리

https://github.com/warpdotdev/common-skills/tree/b811c24365ae505bfc9646458957b886e29110b5/.agents/skills/research

참조

e5464e662405de6361fdde6b984f9ea865635f64

유지보수 최신성

2026. 9. 8.

사용량

1 다운로드 · 0 조회

파일 구조

📄 SKILL.md

warpdotdev의 다른 스킬

전체 보기

📦

council

Compare Decisions with an AI Council

Complex decisions can suffer from narrow analysis and hidden assumptions. This skill coordinates diverse agents, compares their evidence, and produces one actionable recommendation.

생산성 보기

📦

spec-driven-implementation

Plan Features With Living Specs

Substantial feature work can become ambiguous when product intent, technical decisions, and implementation drift apart. This skill guides agents through practical product and technical specifications that stay aligned with shipped work.

코딩 및 개발 보기

📦

migrate-to-factory

Migrate Workflows to Factory

Moving an existing agent workflow into Factory can create duplicate roles, broken paths, or conflicting handoffs. This skill guides a focused migration into an existing Factory repository and validates the resulting configuration.

DevOps 및 인프라 보기

📦

respond-to-pr-comments-in-blocklist

Resolve Pull Request Feedback Safely

Pull request feedback can be difficult to track, implement, and answer consistently. This skill guides each decision, validates accepted changes, and previews GitHub responses before posting.

코딩 및 개발 보기

📦

write-product-spec

Write Clear Product Specifications

Turn ambiguous feature requests into structured product specifications that align design, engineering, and review. This skill defines user-visible behavior, scope, references, open questions, and handoff details in a consistent PRODUCT.md format.

생산성 보기

📦

diagnose-ci-failures

Diagnose CI Failures Faster

CI failures can hide the first useful error among checks, logs, and repeated noise. This skill gathers relevant GitHub evidence and produces a prioritized plan for repair.

DevOps 및 인프라 보기

전체 보기

📦