council
Compare Decisions with an AI Council
Complex decisions can suffer from narrow analysis and hidden assumptions. This skill coordinates diverse agents, compares their evidence, and produces one actionable recommendation.
๋ด ์์ด์ ํธ๋ก ์ค์น
์ด ์์ฒญ์ ์์ด์ ํธ์ ๋ณต์ฌํ์ธ์. ๊ณต์ Skill ํ์ด์ง์ ๋งค๋ํ์คํธ๊ฐ ํฌํจ๋์ด ์์ต๋๋ค.
Review the Skillstore skill "council" from https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-council.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/warpdotdev-council/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.์์ด์ ํธ๋ ๊ณ์ํด์ ๊ณํ์ ํ์ํ๊ณ ๋ณด์ ์ ์ฑ ์์ ์๊ตฌํ๋ ํ์ธ์ ์์ฒญํด์ผ ํฉ๋๋ค.
์์ด์ ํธ๊ฐ ์ฝ๊ธฐ ์ฌ์ด ๋ฆฌ์์ค
AI ์์ด์ ํธ, ํฌ๋กค๋ฌ, ์คํฌ๋ฆฝํธ๊ฐ ์ ์ฒด ํ์ด์ง ๋์ ์ ๋ฆฌ๋ ์ปจํ ์คํธ๋ง ํ์ํ ๋ ์ด ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ์ฌ์ฉํ์ธ์.
ํ ์คํธํด ๋ณด๊ธฐ
"council" ์ฌ์ฉ ์ค์ ๋๋ค. Should we keep the current cache or adopt the proposed distributed cache?
์์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:
Recommendation: keep the current cache for this release. The proposal improves scale, but migration risk and weak failure testing outweigh the immediate benefit.
"council" ์ฌ์ฉ ์ค์ ๋๋ค. Review this authentication fix from correctness, security, and rollout perspectives.
์์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:
- Consensus: the fix closes the reported bypass.
- Disagreement: reviewers differ on session invalidation scope.
- Next step: add expiration tests and deploy behind staged monitoring.
"council" ์ฌ์ฉ ์ค์ ๋๋ค. Decide whether to refactor now or stabilize the current implementation.
์์ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:
Final call: stabilize first, measure the remaining defects, and schedule the refactor only if the measured maintenance cost justifies it.
๋ณด์ ๊ฐ์ฌ
์์ All six static findings are false positives caused by Markdown backticks, a fenced example, and ordinary model-selection prose. The skill contains no executable code, system reconnaissance, prompt injection, or semantic security concerns.
์ํ ์์ธ
โ๏ธ ์ธ๋ถ ๋ช ๋ น์ด (4)
์ด ๋ณด๊ณ ์ ๊ณต์ ๋ฐ ์ธ์ฉ
๋ฒ์ ์ด ์ง์ ๋ ํ๊ฐ ๋ณด๊ณ ์, ์ค๋ฆฝ ๋ฐฐ์ง, ์๋ฒ ๋ ์นด๋ ๋ฐ ์ธ์ฉ์ ๊ณต์ ํ์ธ์. Skillstore๋ ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณด๊ณ ํ์ง๋ง ์ด Skill์ ์์ ์ฌ๋ถ๋ฅผ ํ๋จํ์ง ์์ต๋๋ค.
๋ณด๊ณ ์ ๋งํฌ ๋ณต์ฌ
https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-council/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown ๋ฐฐ์ง
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-council?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML ๋ฐฐ์ง
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-council?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/warpdotdev-council/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>์๋ฒ ๋ ์นด๋
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/warpdotdev-council.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>ํ์ ์ธ์ฉ (APA ยท BibTeX ยท CFF)
APA ์ธ์ฉ
warpdotdev. (2026). council security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-council/audits/1BibTeX ์ธ์ฉ
@techreport{warpdotdev-warpdotdev-council-2026,
author = {warpdotdev},
title = {council security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-council/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "council security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "warpdotdev"
date-released: "2026-09-04"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-council/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:warpdotdev-council:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore ์ ์
์ด ์ ์์ ์ด์ ์ฆ๊ฑฐ ์ ๋ขฐ๋: ์ค๊ฐ๋ง๋ค ์ ์๋ ๊ฒ
Review an architecture choice
Compare competing designs for correctness, implementation cost, operational risk, and testability before committing to one approach.
Challenge a risky code change
Ask independent reviewers to inspect a proposed fix for regressions, security concerns, and missing tests.
Assess an incident response
Combine implementation, reliability, and contrarian perspectives into a prioritized recovery and prevention recommendation.
์ด ํ๋กฌํํธ๋ฅผ ์ฌ์ฉํด ๋ณด์ธ์
Run a council on [question]. Compare [option A] and [option B], then recommend one using [decision criteria].
Form a read-only council to review [proposal or artifact]. Assess correctness, implementation effort, testing needs, and operational risks.
Use diverse models to evaluate [change]. Assign architecture, implementation, and adversarial perspectives. Cite evidence and identify unresolved assumptions.
Investigate [decision] with a model-diverse council. Compare findings by evidence quality, resolve disagreements, and separate immediate actions from optional hardening.
๋ชจ๋ฒ ์ฌ๋ก
- Define one precise decision, relevant artifacts, constraints, and evaluation criteria before launching the council.
- Use distinct models and perspectives, then judge reports by cited evidence instead of vote count.
- Keep read-only agents from editing files and isolate implementation agents in separate worktrees.
ํผํ๊ธฐ
- Do not launch several agents with identical models, prompts, and analytical roles.
- Do not treat lifecycle completion as proof that a report contains useful evidence.
- Do not present raw agent transcripts when the user needs a concise recommendation.
์์ฃผ ๋ฌป๋ ์ง๋ฌธ
What problems suit this skill?
Does every council require three agents?
Can council members edit code?
What happens when model diversity is unavailable?
How are conflicting recommendations resolved?
Does the skill guarantee a correct decision?
๊ฐ๋ฐ์ ์ธ๋ถ ์ ๋ณด
์์ฑ์
warpdotdev๋ผ์ด์ ์ค
MIT
Skillstore ๋ฆฌ๋น์
r1
๋ฒ์ ์๋ด
์์ฑ์๊ฐ ๋ฒ์ ์ ์ ์ธํ์ง ์์์ต๋๋ค.
๋ฆฌํฌ์งํ ๋ฆฌ
https://github.com/warpdotdev/common-skills/tree/b811c24365ae505bfc9646458957b886e29110b5/.agents/skills/council์ฐธ์กฐ
096c7daa4d0d974771dad12d81c3d0d4688617b9
์ ์ง๋ณด์ ์ต์ ์ฑ
2026. 9. 8.
์ฌ์ฉ๋
1 ๋ค์ด๋ก๋ ยท 0 ์กฐํ
ํ์ผ ๊ตฌ์กฐ
๐ SKILL.md