์Šคํ‚ฌ pricing-tribunal
๐Ÿ“ฆ

pricing-tribunal

์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ  ๋ฆฌ๋น„์ „ r1 ์•ˆ์ „ โš™๏ธ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ๋ช…๋ น์–ด๐Ÿ“ ํŒŒ์ผ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์ ‘๊ทผ

Evaluate High-Stakes Pricing Changes

Material pricing changes can affect revenue and customer retention without clear evidence or approval criteria. This workflow structures hypotheses, controlled tests, decision reviews, and post-rollout audits.

์ง€์›: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it ๐Ÿฅ‰ 77 ๋ธŒ๋ก ์ฆˆ

๋‚ด ์—์ด์ „ํŠธ๋กœ ์„ค์น˜

์ด ์š”์ฒญ์„ ์—์ด์ „ํŠธ์— ๋ณต์‚ฌํ•˜์„ธ์š”. ๊ณต์‹ Skill ํŽ˜์ด์ง€์™€ ๋งค๋‹ˆํŽ˜์ŠคํŠธ๊ฐ€ ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์—์ด์ „ํŠธ ์š”์ฒญ
Review the Skillstore skill "pricing-tribunal" from https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

์—์ด์ „ํŠธ๋Š” ๊ณ„์†ํ•ด์„œ ๊ณ„ํš์„ ํ‘œ์‹œํ•˜๊ณ  ๋ณด์•ˆ ์ •์ฑ…์—์„œ ์š”๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ํ™•์ธ์„ ์š”์ฒญํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์—์ด์ „ํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์ฝ๊ธฐ ์‰ฌ์šด ๋ฆฌ์†Œ์Šค

AI ์—์ด์ „ํŠธ, ํฌ๋กค๋Ÿฌ, ์Šคํฌ๋ฆฝํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์ „์ฒด ํŽ˜์ด์ง€ ๋Œ€์‹  ์ •๋ฆฌ๋œ ์ปจํ…์ŠคํŠธ๋งŒ ํ•„์š”ํ•  ๋•Œ ์ด ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์„ธ์š”.

ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•ด ๋ณด๊ธฐ

"pricing-tribunal" ์‚ฌ์šฉ ์ค‘์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. We propose usage-based pricing instead of a flat subscription. Revenue impact is estimated at 12%; reversal would take 90 days.

์˜ˆ์ƒ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:

  • Risk tier: Strategic because the proposal changes the value metric and exceeds 10% estimated ARR impact.
  • Test window: 8-12 weeks, with executive review and grandfathering for existing customers.
  • Missing inputs: predicted lift, downside concentration, falsification condition, cohort size, and kill-switch threshold.

"pricing-tribunal" ์‚ฌ์šฉ ์ค‘์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. We predicted a 20% ACV increase. The statistically significant result was 19%; side effects matched predictions and all owners approved in writing.

์˜ˆ์ƒ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:

  • Direction: Pass. Magnitude: Pass because 19% is within the stated tolerance around the 20% prediction.
  • Side effects: Pass. Written approvals: Pass.
  • Downside concentration: Not supplied. Complete this check before declaring all criteria passed or recommending rollout.

"pricing-tribunal" ์‚ฌ์šฉ ์ค‘์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. At the 30-day audit, churn exceeded our predicted downside after the pricing rollout.

์˜ˆ์ƒ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:

  • Audit finding: Actual downside diverged from the test prediction.
  • Document the divergence reason in the failed-test registry.
  • Reassess side effects and customer concentration at the 60- and 90-day reviews.

๋ณด์•ˆ ๊ฐ์‚ฌ

์•ˆ์ „

All 15 static findings are false positives involving Markdown formatting, documentation references, or business experiment questions. No evidence found of command execution, malicious filesystem access, data exfiltration, or prompt injection in the reviewed file. Referenced documents were not included in the audited file set.

1
์Šค์บ”๋œ ํŒŒ์ผ
201
๋ถ„์„๋œ ์ค„ ์ˆ˜
0
๊ฒ€ํ†  ํ•ญ๋ชฉ
0
์˜คํƒ ๋ฌด์‹œ๋จ

์œ„ํ—˜ ์š”์ธ

๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ตœ๊ทผ์— ์™„๋ฃŒ๋œ ์ •์ ยท์˜๋ฏธ๋ก ์  ๊ฐ์‚ฌ์—์„œ ํ™•์ธ๋œ ๋ณด์•ˆ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์ด ๊ฐ์ง€๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ์Šคํ‚ฌ์— ๋ถ€์ž‘์šฉ์ด ์—†์Œ์„ ์ฆ๋ช…ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
๊ฐ์‚ฌ์ž: codex
์ด ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ ๊ณต์œ  ๋ฐ ์ธ์šฉ

๋ฒ„์ „์ด ์ง€์ •๋œ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ, ์ค‘๋ฆฝ ๋ฐฐ์ง€, ์ž„๋ฒ ๋“œ ์นด๋“œ ๋ฐ ์ธ์šฉ์„ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜์„ธ์š”. Skillstore๋Š” ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณด๊ณ ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์ด Skill์˜ ์•ˆ์ „ ์—ฌ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ํŒ๋‹จํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฒ„์ „๋ณ„ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ ์—ด๊ธฐ
๋ณด์•ˆ ํ‰๊ฐ€

๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ ๋งํฌ ๋ณต์‚ฌ

https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown ๋ฐฐ์ง€

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML ๋ฐฐ์ง€

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

์ž„๋ฒ ๋“œ ์นด๋“œ

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
ํ•™์ˆ  ์ธ์šฉ (APA ยท BibTeX ยท CFF)

APA ์ธ์šฉ

cmj-hub. (2026). pricing-tribunal security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal/audits/1

BibTeX ์ธ์šฉ

@techreport{cmj-hub-cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal-2026, author = {cmj-hub}, title = {pricing-tribunal security audit report (audit version 1)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {1}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal/audits/1}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "pricing-tribunal security audit report (audit version 1)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "cmj-hub" date-released: "2026-10-03" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal/audits/1" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal:audit:1" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore ์ ์ˆ˜

์ด ์ ์ˆ˜์˜ ์ด์œ  ์ฆ๊ฑฐ ์‹ ๋ขฐ๋„: ์ค‘๊ฐ„
55
์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜
85
์œ ์ง€๋ณด์ˆ˜์„ฑ
87
์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ 
65
์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆํ‹ฐ
83
์‚ฌ์–‘ ์ค€์ˆ˜

๋งŒ๋“ค ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ

Review a Value-Metric Change

Assess a move from flat subscription pricing to usage pricing, including customer downside and strategic approval requirements.

Design a Sales Pricing Pilot

Prepare a limited prospect pilot with predicted revenue changes, cohort criteria, and a documented stop condition.

Audit a Pricing Rollout

Compare post-launch results against predictions and document unexpected effects at 30-, 60-, and 90-day reviews.

์ด ํ”„๋กฌํ”„ํŠธ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด ๋ณด์„ธ์š”

Classify a Proposed Change
Review this pricing change: [change]. Estimated ARR impact: [percentage]; affected customers: [percentage]; reversal time: [days]. Identify the risk tier and missing information.
Build a Pricing Hypothesis
Develop a hypothesis for [change]. Use these assumptions: [expected outcome, mechanism, and customer downside]. Include predicted magnitude, direction, and a falsification condition.
Design a Controlled Test
Create a tribunal test plan for [hypothesis] using [risk tier and available data]. Specify cohort, duration, kill-switch threshold, and approval owners. Mark unsupported assumptions.
Adjudicate and Plan Follow-Up
Compare [test results] with [predictions] using the verdict matrix. Consider [side effects, downside concentration, and written approvals]. Recommend a verdict and post-rollout audit criteria. Identify inconclusive evidence.

๋ชจ๋ฒ” ์‚ฌ๋ก€

  • State expected magnitude, direction, mechanism, downside concentration, and falsification conditions before collecting results.
  • Record every changed input and document inconclusive tests instead of treating them as successful evidence.
  • Name approval owners, define stop thresholds, and confirm review dates with the operator.

ํ”ผํ•˜๊ธฐ

  • Treating a full pricing cutover as a controlled experiment.
  • Changing multiple inputs without documenting attribution limits.
  • Approving rollout without complete evidence, written sign-offs, or post-rollout review dates.

์ž์ฃผ ๋ฌป๋Š” ์งˆ๋ฌธ

What does Pricing Tribunal produce?
It drafts a pricing plan with a hypothesis, test design, approval owners, adjudication date, and post-rollout review dates.
When should I use the full workflow?
Use it for material or strategic changes involving revenue impact, affected customers, limited reversibility, or a new value metric.
Does it run experiments or change live prices?
No. It provides instructions and planning templates. Operators must execute experiments and manage pricing changes.
Does it calculate statistical significance?
No statistical calculation method is included. Provide validated results or identify the test as inconclusive.
Can I invoke it directly as a command?
Its metadata marks it as not user-invocable. The main pricing skill normally routes relevant decisions to this workflow.
Does it schedule audits and send approvals?
No calendar or messaging integration is included. It asks the operator to confirm scheduling, approval requests, and monitoring.

๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์ž ์„ธ๋ถ€ ์ •๋ณด

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž

cmj-hub

๋ผ์ด์„ ์Šค

MIT

Skillstore ๋ฆฌ๋น„์ „

r1

๋ฒ„์ „ ์•ˆ๋‚ด

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž๊ฐ€ ๋ฒ„์ „์„ ์„ ์–ธํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ฐธ์กฐ

87c8aed34016973ea5fe803d983af0daa45a98e5

์œ ์ง€๋ณด์ˆ˜ ์ตœ์‹ ์„ฑ

2026. 10. 3.

์‚ฌ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰

0 ๋‹ค์šด๋กœ๋“œ ยท 0 ์กฐํšŒ

ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ตฌ์กฐ

๐Ÿ“„ SKILL.md

cmj-hub์˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์Šคํ‚ฌ

์ „์ฒด ๋ณด๊ธฐ
์ „์ฒด ๋ณด๊ธฐ
๐Ÿ“ฆ

newsletter-monetization-planner

81

๋‰ด์Šค๋ ˆํ„ฐ ์ˆ˜์ต ๋ฐ ์Šคํฐ์„œ์‹ญ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ๊ณ„ํš

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž aaron-he-zhu

๋‰ด์Šค๋ ˆํ„ฐ ์šด์˜์ž๋Š” ๋…์ž ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ, ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ, ์ˆ˜์ต ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ค์šด ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์Šคํ‚ฌ์€ ๊ตฌ๋…, ์Šคํฐ์„œ์‹ญ, ์„ฑ์žฅ ์‹œ๋‚˜๋ฆฌ์˜ค๋ฅผ ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•œ ๋ ˆ์ด๋ธ”๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ ๋ณด๊ธฐ
๐Ÿ“ฆ

pricing-strategy

78

๊ฐ€์น˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์ „๋žต ์„ค๊ณ„

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž sickn33

๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ๊ฒฐ์ •์€ ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ ์—†์ด ๋ฆฌ์„œ์น˜, ํŒจํ‚ค์ง•, ๋งค์ถœ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๊ฐ€ ๋’ค์„ž์ด๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์Šคํ‚ฌ์€ ๊ฐ€์น˜ ์ง€ํ‘œ, ํ‹ฐ์–ด, ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธ, ์ถœ์‹œ ๊ณ„ํš์„ ์ฒด๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์•ˆ๋‚ดํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ ๋ณด๊ธฐ
๐Ÿ“ฆ

micro-saas-launcher

78

์ง‘์ค‘๋œ ๋งˆ์ดํฌ๋กœ SaaS ์ œํ’ˆ์„ ๋” ๋น ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ์ถœ์‹œํ•˜๊ธฐ

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž sickn33

์†”๋กœ ์ฐฝ์—…์ž๋Š” ์ˆ˜์š”๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ธฐ ์ „์— ๋„ˆ๋ฌด ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋งŒ๋“œ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์Šคํ‚ฌ์€ ์ง‘์ค‘๋œ SaaS ์ œํ’ˆ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฒ€์ฆ, MVP ๋ฒ”์œ„, ๊ฐ€๊ฒฉ ์ฑ…์ •, ์ถœ์‹œ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์•ˆ๋‚ดํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ƒ์‚ฐ์„ฑ ๋ณด๊ธฐ
๐Ÿ“ฆ

senior-data-scientist

81

๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์‚ฌ์ด์–ธ์Šค ์‹คํ—˜ ๋ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ ์„ค๊ณ„

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž davila7

๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์‚ฌ์ด์–ธ์Šค ํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ์—๋Š” ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ณ„ํš๊ณผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ์ ๊ฒ€์ด ๋ถ€์กฑํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์Šคํ‚ฌ์€ ์‹คํ—˜, ํŠน์„ฑ, ๋ชจ๋ธ, ๋ถ„์„ ์˜์‚ฌ๊ฒฐ์ •์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”๋œ ์ง€์นจ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋ฐ ๋ถ„์„ ๋ณด๊ธฐ
๐Ÿ“ฆ

architect

78

์†Œํ”„ํŠธ์›จ์–ด ์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜ ๊ณ„ํš

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž 0xSero

์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •์ด ๋ช…ํ™•ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์œผ๋ฉด ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์€ ์ž์ฃผ ์‹คํŒจํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์Šคํ‚ฌ์€ Claude, Codex, Claude Code๊ฐ€ ์˜ต์…˜์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ณ , ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ๋“œ๋Ÿฌ๋‚ด๋ฉฐ, ๊ตฌํ˜„ ๊ณ„ํš์„ ์ž‘์„ฑํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋„์›€์„ ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ฝ”๋”ฉ ๋ฐ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ๋ณด๊ธฐ