last30days
Research Recent Community Discussions
Recent discussions are scattered across social platforms and public websites. This skill gathers recent evidence, compares engagement, and produces cited research with source coverage.
Diesen Skill nicht automatisch installieren.
Die maßgebliche Richtlinie verlangt vor jeder Installationsaktion eine Prüfung durch einen Bediener.
Mit meinem Agent installieren
Kopieren Sie diese Anfrage in Ihren Agent. Sie enthält die maßgebliche Skill-Seite und das Manifest.
Review the Skillstore skill "last30days" from https://skillstore.io/skills/mvanhorn-last30days.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/mvanhorn-last30days/manifest. Verify the artifact. Do not auto-install. Inspect the skill and report your findings, then wait for an operator or manual installation decision.Ihr Agent sollte weiterhin seinen Plan anzeigen und alle von der Sicherheitsrichtlinie verlangten Bestätigungen anfordern.
Agent-lesbare Ressourcen
Verwenden Sie diese Links, wenn ein KI-Agent, Crawler oder Skript sauberen Kontext benötigt, statt die vollständige Seite zu lesen.
Testen
„last30days“ wird verwendet. Research recent feedback about a developer tool.
Erwartetes Ergebnis:
- Illustrative structure only, not live research results.
- Key themes: recurring praise, reported problems, and areas with insufficient evidence.
- Evidence: attributed comments, source links, dates, and engagement where available.
- Coverage: sources that completed, returned partial results, or could not be reached.
„last30days“ wird verwendet. Compare two products and prepare a local brief.
Erwartetes Ergebnis:
- Illustrative structure only, not a completed comparison.
- Quick verdict: evidence-backed tradeoffs for the requested use case.
- Per-product findings: strengths and complaints supported by separate citations.
- Deliverable: a local HTML brief, with a saved location only when creation succeeds.
Sicherheitsaudit
KritischAll 400 presented findings were adjudicated; many are lexical false positives, but remote shell installers and browser credential access remain real risks. Semantic review identified consent bypass, cross-provider token disclosure, and deliberate scanner-visibility reductions; no audit-directed prompt injection evidence was found. The analyzer omitted 4,034 additional matches, which remain unconfirmed and require manual review before automatic publication. Static review was capped at 400/4434 representative findings; omitted static matches are unconfirmed, so automatic publishing stays disabled until manual review.
Bestätigte Sicherheitsbedenken (18)
Alle 18 bestätigten Funde anzeigen
Elemente der Fähigkeitsprüfung (8)
Dies sind echte lokale Fähigkeiten, die für diese Fähigkeit erwartet werden können; daher müssen sie überprüft werden, werden jedoch nicht als bestätigtes bösartiges Verhalten gezählt.
Risikofaktoren
📁 Dateisystemzugriff (50)
⚙️ Externe Befehle (50)
🔑 Umgebungsvariablen (50)
🌐 Netzwerkzugriff (50)
Erkannte Muster
Diesen Bericht teilen & zitieren
Teile den versionierten Bewertungsbericht, das neutrale Badge, die Einbettungskarte und Zitate. Skillstore berichtet Nachweise, ohne zu entscheiden, ob dieser Skill sicher ist.
Berichtslink kopieren
https://skillstore.io/skills/mvanhorn-last30days/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown-Badge
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/mvanhorn-last30days?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML-Badge
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/mvanhorn-last30days?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/mvanhorn-last30days/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Einbettungskarte
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/mvanhorn-last30days.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Wissenschaftliche Zitate (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA-Zitat
mvanhorn. (2026). last30days security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version 3.30.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/mvanhorn-last30days/audits/1BibTeX-Zitat
@techreport{mvanhorn-mvanhorn-last30days-2026,
author = {mvanhorn},
title = {last30days security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/mvanhorn-last30days/audits/1},
note = {Author version 3.30.0}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "last30days security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "3.30.0"
type: report
authors:
- name: "mvanhorn"
date-released: "2026-10-25"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/mvanhorn-last30days/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:mvanhorn-last30days:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Varianten vergleichen
2 installierbare VariantenJeder Autor bleibt ein eigener installierbarer Skill. Die empfohlene Variante wird nach Skillstore-Nachweisen bewertet.
Warum diese Variante zuerst steht
sickn33-last30days
2026-09-09
mvanhorn-last30days
2026-10-25
Skillstore-Score
Warum dieser Score Evidenzvertrauen: NiedrigWas Sie erstellen können
Evaluate Developer Tool Feedback
Compare recent discussions about two frameworks and identify recurring strengths, complaints, and unresolved questions.
Track Product and Competitor Reactions
Collect recent community reactions to a product launch and compare them with named competitors.
Find Evidence for Editorial Topics
Discover current discussion topics and review attributed comments before selecting an article or podcast angle.
Diese Prompts ausprobieren
/last30days Research recent discussions about [topic] from the last 30 days. Cite the evidence and state coverage gaps.
/last30days Research [product] on Reddit and Hacker News. Group recurring complaints and praise, include attributed comments, and distinguish evidence from interpretation.
/last30days Compare [product A] versus [product B] over the last 30 days. Separate each product's evidence and explain tradeoffs with citations.
/last30days Research [topic] with my local notes at [directory]. Keep document contents local and produce a local HTML brief without publishing.
Bewährte Praktiken
- Name the topic, date window, and required sources. Inspect coverage before interpreting missing results.
- Use dedicated provider credentials and avoid browser-backed access until the reported consent issues are resolved.
- Verify important claims against cited sources and approve credit spending or public publishing separately.
Vermeiden
- Treating partial retrieval or authentication failure as proof that nobody discussed a topic.
- Pasting unrelated provider credentials or running unverified remote installation commands.
- Publishing private notes or saved research without explicit authorization and an access review.
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Does every source need an API key?
Does it guarantee complete 30-day coverage?
Can research incur charges?
Can it read browser sessions?
Can I include private local documents?
Are reports published automatically?
Entwicklerdetails
Autor
mvanhornLizenz
MIT
Autorenversion
v3.30.0
Skillstore-Revision
r1
Ref.
f235fd0d05aad155ada09449398e238597b5b345
Aktualität der Wartung
25.10.2026
Nutzung
0 Downloads · 0 Aufrufe