code-reviewer
Review Code Changes with Evidence
Code reviews can miss blockers, regressions, and unverified claims. This skill guides a focused, evidence-based review of the relevant change set.
使用我的智慧代理安裝
將此請求複製給你的智慧代理，其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。
Review the Skillstore skill "code-reviewer" from https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫，並依安全政策請求必要確認。
Agent 可讀資源
當 AI Agent、爬蟲或腳本需要乾淨脈絡、而不是讀取完整頁面時，請使用這些連結。
測試它
正在使用「code-reviewer」。 Review a change that modifies authentication validation.
預期結果:
- Change summary: Validation now rejects expired sessions.
- Blocker: A refresh path still accepts an expired token.
- Verification gap: No test result was provided for the refresh path.
正在使用「code-reviewer」。 Re-review a bug fix after developer feedback.
預期結果:
- Change summary: The null check was added in the requested method.
- Major: A neighboring caller still passes an invalid value.
- Remaining risk: The integration scenario needs a focused test.
安全審計
安全All 35 static findings are false positives. The backtick matches are Markdown inline-code spans in a Chinese-language review instruction file, and the `../` matches are static relative links to sibling documentation, so there is no command execution or path traversal. The entropy alert reflects UTF-8 Chinese prose. No prompt injection, network access, data exfiltration, or malicious intent was found.
風險因素
⚙️ 外部命令 (14)
分享與引用此報告
分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據，不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。
複製報告連結
https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown 徽章
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML 徽章
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>嵌入卡片
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA 引用
zhaobolun-code. (2026). code-reviewer security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/audits/1BibTeX 引用
@techreport{zhaobolun-code-zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer-2026,
author = {zhaobolun-code},
title = {code-reviewer security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "code-reviewer security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "zhaobolun-code"
date-released: "2026-09-17"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
比較變體
10 個可安裝變體每位作者的技能都保留為獨立的可安裝項目。推薦變體依 Skillstore 證據排序。
為何此變體排名第一
alirezarezvani-code-reviewer
2026-10-22
curiouslearner-code-reviewer
2026-09-09
zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer
2026-10-06
Skillstore 評分
評分依據 證據置信度: 中你可以打造什麼
Review a pull request
Identify release-blocking defects and regression risks before merging a focused change.
Check a repair round
Review only the latest fixes and confirm whether earlier findings were addressed.
Assess delivery evidence
Check whether claimed validation has supporting commands, outputs, and scope.
試試這些提示
Review my current code changes. List blockers and regression risks with evidence.
Review this pull request against its stated requirements. Prioritize defects that could block merging.
Re-review only the changes made since the previous review. Confirm which earlier findings remain.
Perform a standards and specification review of this change. Group findings by axis and include integration risks.
最佳實務
- Provide the change scope, requirements, and relevant test results before requesting review.
- Address blocker and major findings before requesting a re-review.
- Use a focused re-review after fixes instead of repeating the entire review.
避免
- Do not request a review without identifying the change set or expected behavior.
- Do not treat a review as proof that tests and runtime validation succeeded.
- Do not use minor style preferences as merge blockers.
常見問題
Does this skill change my code?
What should I provide for a review?
Can it review a pull request?
Can it re-review a fix?
Does it run tests automatically?
Does it perform a security review?
開發者詳細資訊
授權
MIT
Skillstore 修訂
r1
版本提示
作者未聲明版本。
引用
9be34bdd3e1cb2f1280ccd11fa00419204fc4d81
維護新鮮度
2026/9/18
使用量
0 次下載 · 0 次瀏覽
檔案結構