技能 diagnose-ci-failures

📦

diagnose-ci-failures

Name: diagnose-ci-failures
Author: warpdotdev

內容修訂 r1 安全 ⚙️ 外部命令

Diagnose CI Failures Faster

CI failures can hide the first useful error among checks, logs, and repeated noise. This skill gathers relevant GitHub evidence and produces a prioritized plan for repair.

支援: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 78 銅級

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 78 銅級

使用我的智慧代理安裝

將此請求複製給你的智慧代理，其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。

智能體請求

Review the Skillstore skill "diagnose-ci-failures" from https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-diagnose-ci-failures.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/warpdotdev-diagnose-ci-failures/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫，並依安全政策請求必要確認。

Agent 可讀資源

當 AI Agent、爬蟲或腳本需要乾淨脈絡、而不是讀取完整頁面時，請使用這些連結。

Markdown 詳情 GET /skills/warpdotdev-diagnose-ci-failures.md 已簽名 manifest GET /api/skills/warpdotdev-diagnose-ci-failures/manifest 已簽名 lockfile GET /api/skills/warpdotdev-diagnose-ci-failures/lockfile

測試它

正在使用「diagnose-ci-failures」。 Diagnose the failures on pull request 42.

預期結果:

The Linux test job fails first because a fixture is missing. Formatting and downstream build checks may be secondary failures. Recommended order: restore the fixture, rerun tests, then address formatting.

正在使用「diagnose-ci-failures」。 Compare the failed macOS and Linux checks.

預期結果:

Both platforms report the same dependency resolution error.
The Windows job passed, so the issue may depend on runner configuration or lockfile handling.
Verify the dependency cache and lockfile before changing application code.

安全審計

安全

v1 • 2026/9/18 開啟版本化報告

All 25 static detections are false positives: the reported backticks occur in Markdown examples, inline code formatting, or command references. The available evidence shows no executed command, injected input, data exfiltration, or prompt-injection content.

已掃描檔案

114

分析行數

複核項目

已忽略的誤報

最近一次完成的靜態與語意稽核未偵測到已確認的安全發現。這並不能證明該 Skill 沒有副作用。

審計單位: claude

分享與引用此報告

分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據，不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。

開啟版本化報告

複製報告連結

https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-diagnose-ci-failures/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 徽章

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/warpdotdev-diagnose-ci-failures/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-diagnose-ci-failures?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 徽章

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-diagnose-ci-failures?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/warpdotdev-diagnose-ci-failures/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

嵌入卡片

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/warpdotdev-diagnose-ci-failures.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 引用

warpdotdev. (2026). diagnose-ci-failures security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-diagnose-ci-failures/audits/1

BibTeX 引用

@techreport{warpdotdev-warpdotdev-diagnose-ci-failures-2026,
  author = {warpdotdev},
  title = {diagnose-ci-failures security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-diagnose-ci-failures/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "diagnose-ci-failures security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "warpdotdev"
date-released: "2026-09-18"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-diagnose-ci-failures/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:warpdotdev-diagnose-ci-failures:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore 評分

評分依據證據置信度: 中

架構

可維護性

內容

社群

規範符合度

你可以打造什麼

Triage a pull request

Review failing checks on an active pull request and isolate the earliest actionable error.

Prepare a repair handoff

Convert noisy CI output into a prioritized plan that another engineer can implement.

Investigate cross-platform failures

Compare platform-specific checks and identify whether formatting, tests, builds, or tooling cause the failure.

試試這些提示

Check my pull request

Inspect the CI status for pull request <number> in <owner>/<repo>. Summarize failed checks and the first useful error for each.

Explain the failing logs

For pull request <number>, retrieve the relevant failed job logs, remove repeated noise, and explain the likely cause in plain language.

Build a fix plan

Analyze all failed checks for pull request <number>. Group related failures, rank them by likely root cause, and create a step-by-step repair plan with verification commands.

Compare platform failures

Investigate pull request <number> across macOS, Linux, and Windows checks. Distinguish shared root causes from platform-specific issues and cite the evidence for each conclusion.

最佳實務

Provide the repository and pull request number so the diagnosis targets the correct checks.
Fix the earliest root-cause failure before addressing downstream or repeated errors.
Review the proposed commands and changes before running them in a repository.

避免

Do not treat every failed check as an independent root cause.
Do not expose private logs or credentials in copied prompts or issue comments.
Do not rerun expensive workflows repeatedly without changing the suspected cause.

常見問題

What does this skill inspect?

It inspects pull request checks, failed workflow jobs, and accessible GitHub Actions logs.

Does it fix the code?

No. It explains the evidence and prepares a repair plan for an engineer to review and implement.

What access is required?

The GitHub CLI must be authenticated and authorized to read the repository and relevant workflow logs.

Can it diagnose local test failures?

It focuses on CI evidence. You can provide local output separately, but local execution is not its primary capability.

How does it handle many failures?

It groups related checks and prioritizes likely root causes before secondary failures.

Should I run suggested commands immediately?

No. Review each command, its scope, and its repository impact before execution.

開發者詳細資訊

作者

warpdotdev

授權

MIT

Skillstore 修訂

版本提示

作者未聲明版本。

儲存庫

https://github.com/warpdotdev/common-skills/tree/69b4753651ab7fab518c82be087b9f1d5b966631/.agents/skills/diagnose-ci-failures

引用

6e663c781098ffdba3ad66055d217e0dd327bd20

維護新鮮度

2026/9/18

使用量

0 次下載 · 0 次瀏覽

檔案結構

📄 SKILL.md

warpdotdev 的更多技能

查看全部

📦

council

Compare Decisions with an AI Council

Complex decisions can suffer from narrow analysis and hidden assumptions. This skill coordinates diverse agents, compares their evidence, and produces one actionable recommendation.

效率查看

📦

spec-driven-implementation

Plan Features With Living Specs

Substantial feature work can become ambiguous when product intent, technical decisions, and implementation drift apart. This skill guides agents through practical product and technical specifications that stay aligned with shipped work.

程式開發查看

📦

migrate-to-factory

Migrate Workflows to Factory

Moving an existing agent workflow into Factory can create duplicate roles, broken paths, or conflicting handoffs. This skill guides a focused migration into an existing Factory repository and validates the resulting configuration.

DevOps 與基礎設施查看

📦

respond-to-pr-comments-in-blocklist

Resolve Pull Request Feedback Safely

Pull request feedback can be difficult to track, implement, and answer consistently. This skill guides each decision, validates accepted changes, and previews GitHub responses before posting.

程式開發查看

📦

write-product-spec

Write Clear Product Specifications

Turn ambiguous feature requests into structured product specifications that align design, engineering, and review. This skill defines user-visible behavior, scope, references, open questions, and handoff details in a consistent PRODUCT.md format.

效率查看

📦

research

Delegate Broad Codebase Research

Large investigations can flood the primary agent context with irrelevant files and logs. This skill delegates read-only research and returns concise conclusions with cited evidence.

研究與學習查看

查看全部

📦