research
Delegate Broad Codebase Research
Large investigations can flood the primary agent context with irrelevant files and logs. This skill delegates read-only research and returns concise conclusions with cited evidence.
自分のエージェントでインストール
このリクエストをエージェントにコピーしてください。正規の Skill ページとマニフェストが含まれています。
Review the Skillstore skill "research" from https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-research.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/warpdotdev-research/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.エージェントは引き続き計画を提示し、セキュリティポリシーで必要な確認を求める必要があります。
エージェントが読めるリソース
AI エージェント、クローラー、スクリプトがページ全体ではなく整理されたコンテキストを必要とする場合は、これらのリンクを使ってください。
テストする
「research」を使用しています。 Find the root cause of this failing integration test and cite the relevant implementation and test locations.
期待される結果:
- Root cause: The retry handler converts the timeout into a permanent failure.
- Evidence: The report identifies the handler and failing test locations.
- Caveat: External service behavior was not reproduced locally.
「research」を使用しています。 Summarize this large pull request, including behavior changes, risks, and test coverage.
期待される結果:
- Change: The request pipeline now validates credentials before loading account data.
- Risk: Existing clients with incomplete credentials may fail earlier.
- Coverage: Unit tests cover validation, but migration behavior remains untested.
「research」を使用しています。 Explain how session recovery works across the repository and identify the main call sites.
期待される結果:
- Flow: Recovery starts after connection loss, restores persisted state, and reconnects active sessions.
- Evidence: The summary lists the coordinator, persistence layer, and reconnect entry points.
- Unknown: Concurrent recovery behavior requires runtime verification.
セキュリティ監査
安全All five static findings are false positives. Four are Markdown inline-code spans, while line 36 discusses subagent costs without performing reconnaissance. No prompt injection, command execution, or semantic security issue was found.
リスク要因
⚙️ 外部コマンド (4)
このレポートを共有・引用
バージョン付き評価レポート、中立的なバッジ、埋め込みカード、引用を共有できます。Skillstore は証拠を報告しますが、この Skill が安全かどうかは判断しません。
レポートリンクをコピー
https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-research/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdownバッジ
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-research?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTMLバッジ
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-research?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/warpdotdev-research/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>埋め込みカード
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/warpdotdev-research.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA形式の引用
warpdotdev. (2026). research security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-research/audits/1BibTeX形式の引用
@techreport{warpdotdev-warpdotdev-research-2026,
author = {warpdotdev},
title = {research security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-research/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "research security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "warpdotdev"
date-released: "2026-09-04"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-research/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:warpdotdev-research:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
バリアントを比較
インストール可能なバリアント 2 件各作者のスキルは個別のインストール項目として維持されます。推奨バリアントは Skillstore の証拠で順位付けされます。
このバリアントが首位の理由
Skillstore スコア
このスコアの理由 証拠の信頼度: 中作成できるもの
Trace a complex test failure
Delegate inspection of long CI logs and related code, then receive the likely cause with supporting locations.
Summarize a large pull request
Review a substantial diff through a subagent and receive the main changes, rationale, risks, and evidence.
Survey an unfamiliar architecture
Map how a component or API is used across a repository without loading every inspected file into primary context.
これらのプロンプトを試す
Investigate {question} in {repository_path}. Work read-only. Return a concise answer with exact file paths, symbols, and important caveats.Analyze {log_or_test_failure} and trace the relevant code. Identify the root cause, cite supporting locations, and note anything not verified.Research {pull_request_or_diff}. Summarize behavioral changes, affected components, design rationale, risks, and tests. Support each major conclusion with file locations.Investigate these independent areas in parallel: {area_one}, {area_two}, and {area_three}. Synthesize the results, preserve evidence, and identify cross-area uncertainties.ベストプラクティス
- Provide an exact question, repository path, and suspected files or symbols.
- Keep investigations read-only unless the task explicitly requires changes.
- Request concise conclusions, exact evidence locations, caveats, and unresolved questions.
回避
- Do not delegate a single lookup or a few known file reads.
- Do not delegate when the primary agent must edit the same files immediately.
- Do not split one coherent investigation into artificial parallel tasks.
よくある質問
When should I use this skill?
When should I inspect files directly?
Does the skill modify repository files?
Can it run several investigations at once?
What should a research report include?
Which AI tools support this skill?
開発者情報
作成者
warpdotdevライセンス
MIT
Skillstore リビジョン
r1
バージョンに関する注意
作者はバージョンを宣言していません。
参照
e5464e662405de6361fdde6b984f9ea865635f64
メンテナンスの新しさ
2026/9/8
利用状況
1 ダウンロード · 0 閲覧
ファイル構成
📄 SKILL.md