技能 better-interface
📦

better-interface

內容修訂 r1 安全 ⚙️ 外部命令

Review Interfaces Across Six Design Disciplines

Separate interface reviews can duplicate issues and obscure the most important fixes. This skill coordinates specialist reviews into one evidence-based report ranked by user impact.

支援: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 77 銅級

使用我的智慧代理安裝

將此請求複製給你的智慧代理，其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。

智能體請求
Review the Skillstore skill "better-interface" from https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫，並依安全政策請求必要確認。

Agent 可讀資源

當 AI Agent、爬蟲或腳本需要乾淨脈絡、而不是讀取完整頁面時，請使用這些連結。

Markdown 詳情 GET /skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface.md 已簽名 manifest GET /api/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/manifest 已簽名 lockfile GET /api/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/lockfile

測試它

正在使用「better-interface」。 Illustrative request: review a settings screen where rendered testing confirms the close control has no accessible name.

預期結果:

  • Scope: settings screen and its close control.
  • HIGH, Accessibility: the close control has no accessible name. Add a name that describes its action.
  • Verification: rendered accessibility inspection confirms the missing name.
  • Verdict: Block until the high-impact finding is resolved; name any unreviewed domains.

正在使用「better-interface」。 Illustrative request: summarize a review with no actionable findings where the writing skill was unavailable.

預期結果:

  • Coverage: list the files, components, states, and checks inspected for each completed domain.
  • Writing: Not reviewed because better-writing was unavailable.
  • Findings: No actionable interface findings.
  • Verdict: Approve for inspected domains only. Writing was not reviewed.

安全審計

安全
v1 • 2026/10/26 開啟版本化報告

All 25 static findings are false positives: 24 match Markdown code spans, and one matches prose about consolidating interface findings. No evidence found of malicious command execution, data exfiltration, or prompt injection in the supplied files. The skill requests safe project checks and specialist skill loading; those external implementations are outside this audit.

3
已掃描檔案
184
分析行數
0
複核項目
0
已忽略的誤報

風險因素

⚙️ 外部命令 (24)
SKILL.md:8 SKILL.md:10 SKILL.md:12 SKILL.md:18 SKILL.md:28 SKILL.md:30 SKILL.md:32 SKILL.md:38 SKILL.md:46 SKILL.md:47 SKILL.md:48 SKILL.md:49 SKILL.md:50 SKILL.md:51 SKILL.md:55 SKILL.md:65 SKILL.md:71 SKILL.md:72 SKILL.md:73 SKILL.md:77 SKILL.md:82 SKILL.md:123 SKILL.md:124 SKILL.md:125
最近一次完成的靜態與語意稽核未偵測到已確認的安全發現。這並不能證明該 Skill 沒有副作用。
審計單位: codex
分享與引用此報告

分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據，不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。

開啟版本化報告
安全評估

複製報告連結

https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 徽章

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 徽章

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

嵌入卡片

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 引用

jakubkrehel. (2026). better-interface security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/audits/1

BibTeX 引用

@techreport{jakubkrehel-jakubkrehel-better-interface-2026, author = {jakubkrehel}, title = {better-interface security audit report (audit version 1)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {1}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/audits/1}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "better-interface security audit report (audit version 1)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "jakubkrehel" date-released: "2026-10-26" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-better-interface/audits/1" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:jakubkrehel-better-interface:audit:1" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore 評分

評分依據 證據置信度: 中
55
架構
85
可維護性
87
內容
65
社群
83
規範符合度

你可以打造什麼

Prioritize frontend fixes

Review a complete application flow and consolidate repeated component issues into actionable fixes ranked by user impact.

Check design consistency

Compare an implemented screen with project conventions across typography, color, layout, writing, and accessibility.

Assess release readiness

Review a critical user journey with explicit coverage, verification results, and a verdict based on remaining high-impact issues.

試試這些提示

Review one screen 
Review [screen] with better-interface. Keep the review read-only and return ranked findings, coverage, verification, and a verdict.
Review a complete flow 
Review [flow] across all available domains. Include empty, loading, error, and narrow-width states, and state any excluded surfaces.
Investigate shared issues 
Review [feature] using our documented design conventions. Consolidate repeated issues against shared tokens or components and prioritize the smallest effective fixes.
Review and implement fixes 
Review [flow] and implement the consolidated findings within that scope. Use project-native solutions, rerun relevant checks, and report remaining issues and unverified behavior.

最佳實務

  • Specify one complete screen or flow and provide the relevant project conventions.
  • Make specialist skills and a working preview available before requesting broad coverage.
  • Check the evidence, verification results, and unreviewed domains before relying on an approval.

避免

  • Treating missing specialist skills or unverified checks as proof that a domain passed.
  • Requesting repository-wide coverage when the available context supports only one complete flow.
  • Expecting source edits from a review request without explicitly authorizing implementation.

常見問題

Which AI tools are listed as supported?
The marketplace lists Claude, Codex, and Claude Code. Available checks and specialist skill loading depend on the host environment.
Does this package include all six specialist skills?
No. It references better-accessibility, better-layout, better-writing, better-typography, better-colors, and better-ui. Missing domains must be marked Not reviewed.
Will a review change my source files?
No, reviews are read-only by default. Source changes require an explicit implementation request.
Can it review a pull request directly?
It directs change-scoped requests to interface-review, which the user must invoke. It can consolidate a review handed back by that skill.
What does an Approve verdict mean?
No HIGH findings remain within inspected domains. MEDIUM and LOW findings may remain, and unreviewed domains must be named.
Does it guarantee accessibility compliance?
No. Results depend on specialist rules, inspected evidence, and available verification. Unavailable checks and unreviewed domains must be disclosed.

開發者詳細資訊

授權

MIT

Skillstore 修訂

r1

版本提示

作者未聲明版本。

儲存庫

https://github.com/jakubkrehel/skills/tree/592aedc44d7d5b3e29740984252902f3e5402a1c/skills/better-interface

引用

255b18dc04b3eaf08a8c32f2640d0a9c150aa2ed

維護新鮮度

2026/10/26

使用量

0 次下載 · 0 次瀏覽

檔案結構

📁 agents/

📄 openai.yaml

📄 review-format.md

📄 SKILL.md

jakubkrehel 的更多技能

查看全部

相關技能

查看全部