技能 dbs-resonate
📦

dbs-resonate

內容修訂 r1 安全 ⚙️ 外部命令🌐 網路存取

Diagnose Audience Resonance in Your Draft

A finished draft can contain clear ideas yet fail to connect with its intended audience. This skill locates specific resonance gaps and recommends focused edits using communication theory.

支援: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 77 銅級

使用我的智慧代理安裝

將此請求複製給你的智慧代理,其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。

智能體請求
Review the Skillstore skill "dbs-resonate" from https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫,並依安全政策請求必要確認。

測試它

正在使用「dbs-resonate」。 Audience: first-time team leads. Draft: Everyone should communicate better. Good leaders are confident. Before assigning work, agree on the deadline and expected result.

預期結果:

  • Core issue: Broad advice obscures a useful action for first-time team leads.
  • Central claim: Agree on deadlines and expected results before assigning work.
  • Primary theory: Uses and gratifications. Practical usefulness is weak because generic claims delay the actionable guidance.
  • Delete: 'Good leaders are confident.' It introduces a separate claim without support.
  • Strengthen: Replace 'Everyone' with a concrete situation involving first-time team leads.
  • Retain: The final sentence. Revised outline: assignment confusion, agreement on expectations, one practical example.

正在使用「dbs-resonate」。 Audience: new freelancers. Draft: Late payments are frustrating. Clients are difficult. You should manage your business professionally.

預期結果:

  • Core issue: The draft names frustration without explaining its cause or giving readers control.
  • Central claim: Unclear payment expectations can leave new freelancers uncertain about their next step.
  • Primary theory: Emotional appraisal. The mechanism is weak because responsibility and control remain unspecified.
  • Delete or qualify: 'Clients are difficult.' The draft provides no evidence for this generalization.
  • Strengthen: Describe a specific unpaid invoice and clarify what action the freelancer can take.
  • Revised outline: concrete payment problem, its effect on planning, one actionable response.

安全審計

安全
v1 • 2026/10/28 開啟版本化報告

All eight static findings are false positives: Markdown delimiters, local skill references, a scholarly DOI, and readable Chinese text. No evidence found of command execution, network transmission, obfuscated payloads, or prompt injection in the reviewed files.

2
已掃描檔案
213
分析行數
0
複核項目
0
已忽略的誤報

風險因素

最近一次完成的靜態與語意稽核未偵測到已確認的安全發現。這並不能證明該 Skill 沒有副作用。
審計單位: codex
分享與引用此報告

分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據,不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。

開啟版本化報告
安全評估

複製報告連結

https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 徽章

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 徽章

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

嵌入卡片

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 引用

dontbesilent2025. (2026). dbs-resonate security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate/audits/1

BibTeX 引用

@techreport{dontbesilent2025-dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate-2026, author = {dontbesilent2025}, title = {dbs-resonate security audit report (audit version 1)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {1}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate/audits/1}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "dbs-resonate security audit report (audit version 1)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "dontbesilent2025" date-released: "2026-10-28" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate/audits/1" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:dontbesilent2025-dbs-resonate:audit:1" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore 評分

評分依據 證據置信度: 中
55
架構
85
可維護性
87
內容
65
社群
83
規範符合度

你可以打造什麼

Clarify a creator script

Locate vague audience references and competing claims in an existing video script, then prioritize concrete revisions.

Strengthen an educational article

Check whether an article gives readers a clear practical use and identify sentences that need stronger explanations.

Focus an organizational message

Review whether an internal draft connects employee concerns to one central claim and a clear intended action.

試試這些提示

Review a first draft
Review this draft for audience resonance: [draft]. Identify the central claim, quote the weakest passages, and suggest specific edits.
Check audience fit
My audience is [audience], and I want them to [action]. Diagnose this draft: [draft]. Flag vague identity references and missing practical value.
Diagnose the dominant mechanism
Analyze [draft] for [audience]. Select one primary theory, quote supporting evidence, rate the mechanism, and explain missing conditions without predicting platform results.
Prioritize a structured revision
Audit [draft] for [audience] seeking [action]. List claims and justify one primary theory. Provide deletion, compression, strengthening, retention, and one revised outline.

最佳實務

  • Provide the complete draft, intended audience, and one desired audience response.
  • Require quotations for each diagnosis and keep one primary theory unless separate evidence supports another.
  • Apply focused edits first, then validate audience response through real feedback rather than assumed platform outcomes.

避免

  • Requesting guaranteed virality, platform metrics, or commercial forecasts from a text diagnosis.
  • Submitting only a topic and expecting a complete article or opening script.
  • Adding emotional pressure or sharing triggers when the draft only needs to support understanding or saving.

常見問題

What should I provide?
Provide an existing draft or partial manuscript, its intended audience, and the response you want from readers.
Will it rewrite the entire draft?
No. Its stated deliverables are diagnosis, specific editing actions, and a revised outline, not a finished replacement manuscript.
Can it predict whether my content will go viral?
No. It examines textual mechanisms and explicitly excludes platform metric predictions and guarantees of popularity.
Which theories can guide the review?
Options include social identity, framing, emotional appraisal, uses and gratifications, and online sharing. The review selects one primary theory.
Does the skill require network access or shell commands?
The reviewed files contain editorial instructions and interface metadata. They do not require network requests or shell execution.
Can it explain why an already published post succeeded?
That is outside its primary scope. It focuses on revising existing drafts rather than explaining proven distribution outcomes.

開發者詳細資訊

授權

MIT

Skillstore 修訂

r1

版本提示

作者未聲明版本。

引用

8322ecc54632436d19d804491fe0bc4bbf7e1d32

維護新鮮度

2026/10/28

使用量

0 次下載 · 0 次瀏覽

檔案結構

📁 agents/

📄 openai.yaml

📄 SKILL.md

dontbesilent2025 的更多技能

查看全部
查看全部