技能 dbs-standard-answer

📦

dbs-standard-answer

Name: dbs-standard-answer
Author: dontbesilent2025

內容修訂 r1 安全 ⚙️ 外部命令

Research Conditional Answers Through Theory and History

Complex questions often receive unsupported theories or misleading historical comparisons. This skill combines theory checks, structural case comparisons, and counterexamples to develop answers with clear conditions.

支援: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 77 銅級

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 77 銅級

使用我的智慧代理安裝

將此請求複製給你的智慧代理，其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。

智能體請求

Review the Skillstore skill "dbs-standard-answer" from https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫，並依安全政策請求必要確認。

Agent 可讀資源

當 AI Agent、爬蟲或腳本需要乾淨脈絡、而不是讀取完整頁面時，請使用這些連結。

Markdown 詳情 GET /skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer.md 已簽名 manifest GET /api/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer/manifest 已簽名 lockfile GET /api/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer/lockfile

測試它

正在使用「dbs-standard-answer」。 Must a successful founder stop delivering client work to build an organization? Use only the information in this question.

預期結果:

Direct answer: No universal rule follows from this question. Delivery and capability building compete for time, but delegation depends on task repeatability and resources.
Theory research: Treat resource allocation and organizational learning as candidate lenses. No specific theory source has been verified.
Historical comparison: No cases were supplied or verified. Search for both successful delegation and failures under similar constraints before drawing historical conclusions.
Conclusion: This is a provisional hypothesis, not a historically established answer. Track delivery quality and founder workload during a limited delegation test.

正在使用「dbs-standard-answer」。 Create a short-video direction about using theory to solve audience problems. Include historical comparison, but do not invent evidence.

預期結果:

Direct answer: Start with a specific audience problem, explain one mechanism, and offer an action whose result can be observed.
Theory research: Check whether a learning theory actually explains the proposed change. Label any source that has not been verified.
Historical comparison: Compare documented teaching successes with unsuccessful transfers. Evidence is still needed before claiming a repeated historical mechanism.
Video outline: Open with a common mistake, demonstrate one correction, and ask viewers to compare results. Present the approach as a test, not a guarantee.

安全審計

安全

v1 • 2026/10/17 開啟版本化報告

All 46 static findings are false positives: 44 identify Markdown backticks, and two entropy warnings concern readable Chinese text. No evidence found of malicious shell execution, obfuscated payloads, credential theft, data exfiltration, or prompt injection in either reviewed file. The skill provides research instructions and allows limited external research while explicitly respecting requests not to browse.

已掃描檔案

472

分析行數

複核項目

已忽略的誤報

最近一次完成的靜態與語意稽核未偵測到已確認的安全發現。這並不能證明該 Skill 沒有副作用。

審計單位: codex

分享與引用此報告

分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據，不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。

開啟版本化報告

複製報告連結

https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 徽章

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 徽章

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

嵌入卡片

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 引用

dontbesilent2025. (2026). dbs-standard-answer security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer/audits/1

BibTeX 引用

@techreport{dontbesilent2025-dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer-2026,
  author = {dontbesilent2025},
  title = {dbs-standard-answer security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "dbs-standard-answer security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "dontbesilent2025"
date-released: "2026-10-17"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:dontbesilent2025-dbs-standard-answer:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore 評分

評分依據證據置信度: 中

架構

可維護性

內容

社群

規範符合度

你可以打造什麼

Evaluate a strategic constraint

Compare a team's delivery bottleneck with relevant theories and historical transitions, then identify conditions for a workable response.

Develop evidence-based teaching material

Connect a theory to concrete audience problems, examine historical examples, and produce short-video outlines with observable actions.

Test a proposed explanation

Assess a causal claim using source checks, structural case comparisons, failures, and counterexamples before presenting a qualified conclusion.

試試這些提示

Explore a practical question

Use dbs-standard-answer to explain why teams struggle to balance delivery and learning. Give a direct answer, relevant theory, historical comparisons, and clear limits.

Review a claim

Review this claim: [claim]. Identify overgeneralizations, select relevant theories, compare historical successes and failures, and label unverified evidence. State when the claim holds.

Turn research into a teaching outline

Study [theory] for [audience]. Check its meaning and sources, map practical problems, and compare historical cases. Produce three short-video outlines with actions and verification.

Conduct a bounded comparative study

Analyze [decision] under [constraints] using only [materials], without browsing. Build a structural fingerprint, theory map, and analogy matrix. Assess failures, counterexamples, evidence gaps, and conditions.

最佳實務

State the problem, constraints, desired result, and permitted research scope before requesting analysis.
Request source status, competing explanations, failure cases, and counterexamples alongside supporting evidence.
Use conclusions only within their stated conditions and validate proposed actions against observable results.

避免

Treating one famous story or quotation as proof of a universal solution.
Matching cases by industry or personal identity while ignoring constraints and causal mechanisms.
Presenting unverified quotations, inferred motives, or historical analogies as established facts.

常見問題

What does standard answer mean here?

It means a mechanism supported by credible theory or independent cases, with explicit conditions and limits. The result may remain unresolved.

Do I need to provide a theory first?

No. The workflow starts from your question and proposes relevant mechanisms and theories while clearly labeling assumptions.

Does the skill always browse the web?

No. It permits browsing only when external facts materially affect the answer or verification is requested. It explicitly respects requests not to browse.

How does it handle missing evidence?

It marks unverified claims, explains missing case categories, and reduces conclusion strength. Repeated verification failures should end the search for that fact.

Can it help create videos or courses?

Yes. It can add requested teaching formats after research. Video outlines connect audience problems, mechanisms, practical actions, demonstrations, and observable results.

Does it execute scripts or install dependencies?

The reviewed package contains only research instructions and interface metadata. Its backticks format Markdown; it supplies no executable scripts or installation steps.

開發者詳細資訊

作者

dontbesilent2025

授權

MIT

Skillstore 修訂

版本提示

作者未聲明版本。

儲存庫

https://github.com/dontbesilent2025/dbskill/tree/926bcb9ae40f348f080f387b259fee4ec0b75f55/skills/dbs-standard-answer

引用

e723928cd71a453ff741b6b350b3ba5989b801f2

維護新鮮度

2026/10/17

使用量

0 次下載 · 0 次瀏覽

檔案結構

📁 agents/

📄 openai.yaml

📄 SKILL.md