code-review-checklist
Review Code with a Five-Axis Checklist
Unstructured code reviews can miss defects and spend time on style preferences. This skill guides five review areas and produces prioritized comments with concrete fixes.
使用我的智慧代理安裝
將此請求複製給你的智慧代理，其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。
Review the Skillstore skill "code-review-checklist" from https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-code-review-checklist.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/alapha888-code-review-checklist/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫，並依安全政策請求必要確認。
Agent 可讀資源
當 AI Agent、爬蟲或腳本需要乾淨脈絡、而不是讀取完整頁面時，請使用這些連結。
測試它
正在使用「code-review-checklist」。 A small order-processing diff indexes the first order without checking whether the list is empty.
預期結果:
- Must fix | Correctness | order.py:87: An empty order list causes IndexError. Check for an empty list before accessing its first item.
- Should fix | Test coverage | order.py:87: Add an empty-order test to cover the failing path.
正在使用「code-review-checklist」。 A contributor requests review of a diff containing 650 changed lines.
預期結果:
Scope: The diff exceeds approximately 400 changed lines. Split it into smaller, focused changes before review.
正在使用「code-review-checklist」。 A reviewer suspects a loop is slow but provides no measurements or evidence of repeated work.
預期結果:
Performance: No evidence found to support a performance finding. Do not raise a speculative performance comment.
安全審計
安全All six static findings are false positives: Markdown formatting was mistaken for command execution, and ordinary review prose was mistaken for reconnaissance. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential access, or data exfiltration in SKILL.md. The skill contains review guidance and examples, not executable tooling.
風險因素
⚙️ 外部命令 (5)
分享與引用此報告
分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據，不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。
複製報告連結
https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-code-review-checklist/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown 徽章
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-code-review-checklist?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML 徽章
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-code-review-checklist?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/alapha888-code-review-checklist/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>嵌入卡片
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/alapha888-code-review-checklist.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA 引用
alapha888. (2026). code-review-checklist security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-code-review-checklist/audits/1BibTeX 引用
@techreport{alapha888-alapha888-code-review-checklist-2026,
author = {alapha888},
title = {code-review-checklist security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-code-review-checklist/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "code-review-checklist security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "alapha888"
date-released: "2026-10-06"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-code-review-checklist/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:alapha888-code-review-checklist:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
比較變體
2 個可安裝變體每位作者的技能都保留為獨立的可安裝項目。推薦變體依 Skillstore 證據排序。
為何此變體排名第一
Skillstore 評分
評分依據 證據置信度: 中你可以打造什麼
Check a change before submission
Review a small diff for edge cases, security risks, and missing tests before opening a pull request.
Standardize team review comments
Apply consistent review categories and priorities while keeping feedback tied to specific lines and concrete fixes.
Evaluate unfamiliar contributions
Review community changes for correctness, readability, and test coverage without focusing on formatting preferences.
試試這些提示
Review this function using the five-axis checklist: [paste function with file name and line numbers]. Cite specific lines and suggest concrete fixes.
Review this diff: [paste diff]. Check scope first, then all five axes. Separate Must fix and Should fix comments. Use at most ten comments.
Review this authentication change: [paste diff and requirements]. Check correctness, injection risks, secrets, logging, and remaining axes. Cite evidence and identify missing edge-case tests.
Review this diff with requirements, tests, and profiling results: [attach context]. Mark each axis pass, fail, or N-A. Prioritize concrete fixes within ten comments.
最佳實務
- Provide the diff, file names, line numbers, and relevant requirements.
- Split changes over approximately 400 lines into focused reviews.
- Require evidence and a concrete fix for each comment, and clarify team merge-blocking rules.
避免
- Approve a change without reading the complete diff.
- Spend review comments on formatting preferences instead of substantive defects.
- Report vague problems or performance concerns without code references and evidence.