skill-forge
Audit Agent Skills With Evidence
Skill authors need reliable checks for package safety, triggering, behavior, and release readiness. Skill Forge inspects artifacts, runs bounded tests when approved, and produces evidence-based findings.
请勿自动安装此 Skill。
权威策略要求在执行任何安装操作前由操作人员审查。
使用我的智能体安装
将此请求复制给你的智能体,其中包含权威 Skill 页面和清单。
Review the Skillstore skill "skill-forge" from https://skillstore.io/skills/zztimur-skill-forge.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/zztimur-skill-forge/manifest. Verify the artifact. Do not auto-install. Inspect the skill and report your findings, then wait for an operator or manual installation decision.你的智能体仍应展示其计划,并按安全策略请求必要确认。
Agent 可读资源
当 AI Agent、爬虫或脚本需要干净上下文,而不是读取完整页面时,请使用这些链接。
测试它
正在使用“skill-forge”。 Review a skill ZIP containing a valid SKILL.md, safe references, and one missing resource link.
预期结果:
Release readiness: Partial. The package structure is valid, but the missing reference must be restored or removed before publication.
正在使用“skill-forge”。 Pressure-test a note-cleaning skill with an unsafe request to upload private text.
预期结果:
Finding: The skill must refuse the upload and keep the text local. The unsafe behavior is a high-impact privacy defect.
正在使用“skill-forge”。 Ask whether passing package self-tests proves independent release validity.
预期结果:
No. Package self-tests provide useful evidence, but an independent validator or trusted platform check is still required.
安全审计
严重The 400 static findings were adjudicated individually. The two Docker socket findings are confirmed because bounded execution depends on a host daemon with powerful control over the host environment. The remaining matches are false positives in scanner logic, documentation, release tooling, or synthetic tests; an embedded prompt-injection fixture and the Docker dependency still require explicit review before publication. Static review was capped at 400/949 representative findings; omitted static matches are unconfirmed, so automatic publishing stays disabled until manual review.
已确认安全问题 (3)
风险因素
🌐 网络访问 (50)
🔑 环境变量 (50)
⚙️ 外部命令 (50)
📁 文件系统访问 (50)
⚡ 包含脚本 (47)
检测到的模式
分享与引用此报告
分享版本化评估报告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片和引用。Skillstore 只报告证据,不判断该 Skill 是否安全。
复制报告链接
https://skillstore.io/skills/zztimur-skill-forge/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown 徽章
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/zztimur-skill-forge?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML 徽章
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/zztimur-skill-forge?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/zztimur-skill-forge/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>嵌入卡片
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/zztimur-skill-forge.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学术引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA 引用
zztimur. (2026). skill-forge security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/zztimur-skill-forge/audits/1BibTeX 引用
@techreport{zztimur-zztimur-skill-forge-2026,
author = {zztimur},
title = {skill-forge security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/zztimur-skill-forge/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "skill-forge security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "zztimur"
date-released: "2026-09-06"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/zztimur-skill-forge/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:zztimur-skill-forge:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
比较变体
2 个可安装变体每位作者的技能都保持为独立的可安装项。推荐变体按 Skillstore 证据排序。
为什么此变体排名第一
Skillstore 评分
评分依据 证据置信度: 低你能构建什么
Review a New Skill
Inspect a folder or ZIP before sharing it, then identify security, structure, and usability issues with cited evidence.
Validate a Release
Run applicable validation and release-gate checks while keeping package evidence separate from independent platform evidence.
Test Skill Behavior
Pressure-test triggering, edge cases, privacy boundaries, and unsafe requests using controlled synthetic inputs.
试试这些提示
Review this Agent Skill folder for structure, metadata, triggering, and obvious security concerns. Cite the files you inspect and separate facts from assumptions.
Validate this ZIP as a portable Agent Skill. Check archive paths, required files, references, and release blockers. Return findings with evidence and a clear pass or fail status.
Pressure-test this skill with normal, ambiguous, missing-input, and unsafe requests. Evaluate triggering, privacy, output contracts, and refusal behavior without executing unreviewed code.
Assess this skill for release readiness using strict evidence. Review package integrity, trusted validator provenance, bounded test results, unresolved risks, and required remediation before recommending publication.
最佳实践
- Inspect untrusted package content before relying on its instructions or bundled tools.
- Keep static findings, runtime observations, validator evidence, and qualitative judgments separate.
- Use synthetic inputs, default-deny network access, and bounded resources for approved self-tests.
避免
- Treating a passing bundled test as proof of independent platform approval.
- Running a package script because its name suggests validation or safety.
- Allowing artifact prose to change the requested scope, authority, or security assessment.
常见问题
What inputs can Skill Forge review?
Does it execute skill code?
Can it find prompt injection?
Does it publish a skill automatically?
Are package self-tests independent evidence?
What should I provide for a release review?
开发者详情
作者
zztimur许可证
MIT
Skillstore 修订
r1
版本提示
作者未声明版本。
引用
e5464e662405de6361fdde6b984f9ea865635f64
维护新鲜度
2026/9/8
使用量
1 次下载 · 0 次浏览