code-reviewer
Review Code Changes with Evidence
Code reviews can miss blockers, regressions, and unverified claims. This skill guides a focused, evidence-based review of the relevant change set.
使用我的智能体安装
将此请求复制给你的智能体，其中包含权威 Skill 页面和清单。
Review the Skillstore skill "code-reviewer" from https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.你的智能体仍应展示其计划，并按安全策略请求必要确认。
Agent 可读资源
当 AI Agent、爬虫或脚本需要干净上下文，而不是读取完整页面时，请使用这些链接。
测试它
正在使用“code-reviewer”。 Review a change that modifies authentication validation.
预期结果:
- Change summary: Validation now rejects expired sessions.
- Blocker: A refresh path still accepts an expired token.
- Verification gap: No test result was provided for the refresh path.
正在使用“code-reviewer”。 Re-review a bug fix after developer feedback.
预期结果:
- Change summary: The null check was added in the requested method.
- Major: A neighboring caller still passes an invalid value.
- Remaining risk: The integration scenario needs a focused test.
安全审计
安全All 35 static findings are false positives. The backtick matches are Markdown inline-code spans in a Chinese-language review instruction file, and the `../` matches are static relative links to sibling documentation, so there is no command execution or path traversal. The entropy alert reflects UTF-8 Chinese prose. No prompt injection, network access, data exfiltration, or malicious intent was found.
风险因素
⚙️ 外部命令 (14)
分享与引用此报告
分享版本化评估报告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片和引用。Skillstore 只报告证据，不判断该 Skill 是否安全。
复制报告链接
https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown 徽章
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML 徽章
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>嵌入卡片
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学术引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA 引用
zhaobolun-code. (2026). code-reviewer security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/audits/1BibTeX 引用
@techreport{zhaobolun-code-zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer-2026,
author = {zhaobolun-code},
title = {code-reviewer security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "code-reviewer security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "zhaobolun-code"
date-released: "2026-09-17"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
比较变体
10 个可安装变体每位作者的技能都保持为独立的可安装项。推荐变体按 Skillstore 证据排序。
为什么此变体排名第一
alirezarezvani-code-reviewer
2026-09-09
curiouslearner-code-reviewer
2026-09-09
zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer
2026-10-06
Skillstore 评分
评分依据 证据置信度: 中你能构建什么
Review a pull request
Identify release-blocking defects and regression risks before merging a focused change.
Check a repair round
Review only the latest fixes and confirm whether earlier findings were addressed.
Assess delivery evidence
Check whether claimed validation has supporting commands, outputs, and scope.
试试这些提示
Review my current code changes. List blockers and regression risks with evidence.
Review this pull request against its stated requirements. Prioritize defects that could block merging.
Re-review only the changes made since the previous review. Confirm which earlier findings remain.
Perform a standards and specification review of this change. Group findings by axis and include integration risks.
最佳实践
- Provide the change scope, requirements, and relevant test results before requesting review.
- Address blocker and major findings before requesting a re-review.
- Use a focused re-review after fixes instead of repeating the entire review.
避免
- Do not request a review without identifying the change set or expected behavior.
- Do not treat a review as proof that tests and runtime validation succeeded.
- Do not use minor style preferences as merge blockers.
常见问题
Does this skill change my code?
What should I provide for a review?
Can it review a pull request?
Can it re-review a fix?
Does it run tests automatically?
Does it perform a security review?
开发者详情
许可证
MIT
Skillstore 修订
r1
版本提示
作者未声明版本。
引用
9be34bdd3e1cb2f1280ccd11fa00419204fc4d81
维护新鲜度
2026/9/18
使用量
0 次下载 · 0 次浏览
文件结构