Audit History

Static command findings are false positives caused by Markdown code spans that list example files, not executable commands. The newsletter style line is also a false positive; it asks for first-person company voice and does not request system reconnaissance or prompt override. No evidence found for prompt injection, data exfiltration, or unauthorized command execution in the reviewed files.

Static command findings are false positives caused by Markdown code spans that list example files, not executable commands. The newsletter style line is also a false positive; it asks for first-person company voice and does not request system reconnaissance or prompt override. No evidence found for prompt injection, data exfiltration, or unauthorized command execution in the reviewed files.

All 11 static findings were evaluated and dismissed as false positives. The weak cryptography and reconnaissance detections match normal writing guidance, and the backtick detections are markdown file paths, not command execution. No prompt injection, executable code, data exfiltration, or unauthorized network behavior was found.

All 11 static analysis findings were evaluated and determined to be false positives. The 'weak cryptographic algorithm' detections were pattern matching errors on normal text content. The 'system reconnaissance' findings were misidentified writing guidance. The 'Ruby/shell backtick execution' findings were markdown formatting backticks, not actual command execution. This skill contains only documentation and templates with no executable code, network calls, or security risks.