Versioned security assessment

Report ID: SA-9CF26BAD

6/30/2026, 10:46:49 PM

environment-setup security assessment v2

Skill Security Certification Report

Audit History
Audit model: codex Historical report
Skill name
environment-setup
Version
v2
Maintainer
supercent-io
Coverage
2 Files scanned · 378 Lines analyzed
Policy version
Unavailable

Confirmed finding summary

No confirmed security findings

The completed audit recorded no confirmed security findings. This is not proof that the Skill has no side effects.

Installation context

Historical evidence

This report may not describe the currently installable artifact. Open the current Skill page for install guidance.

Open current Skill page

This report does not block or authorize the manifest or ZIP.

Static analysis found many shell, network, and credential patterns, but review shows they are primarily fenced documentation examples for environment setup rather than executable skill code. The remaining real risk is that this skill intentionally guides agents to read, write, and validate .env files and secret-bearing configuration, so publication should include a clear warning about secret handling.

Report position

Historical report

Open audit history before using this report to install.

Audit attestation

Not attestable

The required immutable binding is incomplete.

Human verification

Not verified

No human verification is recorded for this report.

Coverage

2 Files scanned · 378 Lines analyzed

3 items shown for review

Limitations

This report does not claim runtime or sandbox execution and does not prove the absence of side effects.

Evidence chain

Follow the evidence from source binding to the install contract. Available evidence supports verification; it is not a safety guarantee.

  1. Source

    Binding unavailable

  2. Artifact

    Identity incomplete

  3. Audit

    Complete

  4. Install contract

    Open manifest to verify

    Open manifest

Capabilities observed

Observed means this report recorded supporting evidence. Not recorded does not prove that a capability is absent.

Contains scripts

May execute code included with the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Network access

May connect to external services.

Observed in 5 evidence locations

Filesystem access

May read or write local files.

Observed in 4 evidence locations

Env variables

May read values from the process environment.

Observed in 5 evidence locations

External commands

May invoke commands or programs outside the Skill.

Observed in 4 evidence locations

Capability review items (3)
Medium
Sensitive Environment File Handling
The skill is designed to create and manage .env templates, local override files, production environment files, and gitignore rules. This is legitimate for an environment setup skill, but it can expose secrets if an agent reads or writes real values without user review.
The cited lines directly instruct handling .env files and variants. The risk is contextual rather than malicious because the same section tells users not to commit secret files.
Medium
Secret-Bearing Configuration Examples
The examples include database URLs, JWT secrets, SMTP credentials, Stripe keys, and AWS key names. They are placeholders, but users may copy the pattern into real files where secrets must be protected.
The examples clearly name and validate sensitive variables. The values appear to be placeholders, so this is a handling risk rather than evidence of embedded live credentials.
Medium
Broad Tool Permissions for Configuration Changes
The skill declares Read, Write, Edit, and Bash access while guiding environment setup. That combination is expected for the task, but it can modify project configuration and should require user confirmation before touching secret-bearing files.
The allowed tools are explicit in the skill front matter. No malicious command is present, but the permission set increases impact if the skill is misused.

Risk findings

Confirmed security concerns are separated from items that still need review.

No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.

Expert evidence

Immutable subject identity, scanner metadata, dismissed matches, and source-level evidence.

Artifact subject

Marketplace commit
Unavailable
Content hash
Unavailable
Tree hash
Unavailable
Skill path
Unavailable
Audit payload hash
Unavailable

Analysis metadata

Audit model: codex

Analysis state: Complete

Scope is limited to the recorded files, lines, methods, and evidence. No runtime or sandbox execution is claimed.

Static false positives ignored (3)
Low
Static Shell Execution Alerts Are Documentation False Positives
The reported Ruby or shell backtick execution alerts align with Markdown fenced examples and inline tags, not actual Ruby backtick execution. No executable Ruby code or command substitution pattern was found in the skill files.
Line review shows Markdown code fences and tag formatting rather than runtime command execution. The skill contains examples only, not a script file that executes these blocks.
Low
Hardcoded URL Alerts Are Benign Examples and References
The hardcoded URL findings are localhost, a placeholder application domain, a placeholder Sentry DSN, and documentation links. No evidence found that the skill sends data to those URLs.
The URLs appear in templates or references and there is no network request code around them. This supports a false-positive assessment for exfiltration.
Low
Prompt Injection Scanner Alerts Are False Positives
The static role-token alerts appear to match variable names such as SMTP_USER and POSTGRES_USER. No evidence found of instructions like ignore previous instructions, system override, or pre-approved safety claims.
Manual review of the cited lines shows configuration field names only. The surrounding file does not contain text formatted as an instruction override.

Verify and export

The manifest and lockfile bind install artifacts to cryptographic hashes. This integrity claim is separate from the security assessment.

Audit attestation: not_attestable