Most command, network, and role-token alerts are false positives caused by Markdown fences, reference links, SMTP field names, or normal YAML variable names. The confirmed risk is sensitive environment management: the skill is designed to create or edit .env-related data and includes credential, secret key, and connection-string examples. No malicious exfiltration instructions or prompt-injection attempts were found.
description: Configure and manage development, staging, and production environments. Use when settin
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
├── .env.production # Production (gitignore or vault)
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill instructs use of environment-specific files such as .env.local or .env.production, which commonly contain secrets. This is legitimate but sensitive file handling.
The skill instructs use of environment-specific files such as .env.local or .env.production, which commonly contain secrets. This is legitimate but sensitive file handling.
The skill instructs use of environment-specific files such as .env.local or .env.production, which commonly contain secrets. This is legitimate but sensitive file handling.
The skill instructs use of environment-specific files such as .env.local or .env.production, which commonly contain secrets. This is legitimate but sensitive file handling.
├── .env.production # Production (gitignore or vault)
The skill instructs use of environment-specific files such as .env.local or .env.production, which commonly contain secrets. This is legitimate but sensitive file handling.
Unsafe Logging of Secret-Bearing Environment Variables
The usage example suggests logging env.DATABASE_URL, which can expose credentials embedded in database connection strings if copied into application code.
Line 127 directly demonstrates printing a database URL. It is commented example code, so confidence is high but not absolute.
The Docker Compose example uses a database URL with postgres:password and sets the database password to password, which can normalize weak defaults if copied.
The weak password string is explicit in the Docker example. The example appears local-only, so the risk depends on whether users copy it beyond development.
Capability review items (25)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
The template includes AWS credential variable names with key-like placeholders. Even as examples, these are secret-bearing fields that can be mishandled if copied.
The template includes AWS credential variable names with key-like placeholders. Even as examples, these are secret-bearing fields that can be mishandled if copied.
The example defines or references database connection strings that may include credentials. The placeholders are not live secrets, but the skill handles secret-bearing values.
The example defines or references database connection strings that may include credentials. The placeholders are not live secrets, but the skill handles secret-bearing values.
DATABASE_URL=${DATABASE_URL} # Injected from environment variables
The example defines or references database connection strings that may include credentials. The placeholders are not live secrets, but the skill handles secret-bearing values.
The example validates or requires DATABASE_URL, which often contains credentials. It is legitimate configuration code, but it handles a secret-bearing connection string.
The example suggests printing env.DATABASE_URL, which can expose credentials embedded in a database connection string. This is a real leakage risk if copied.
The example defines or references database connection strings that may include credentials. The placeholders are not live secrets, but the skill handles secret-bearing values.
The example validates or requires DATABASE_URL, which often contains credentials. It is legitimate configuration code, but it handles a secret-bearing connection string.
The example defines or references database connection strings that may include credentials. The placeholders are not live secrets, but the skill handles secret-bearing values.
The example defines or validates STRIPE_SECRET_KEY, a secret-bearing API key variable. It uses a placeholder, but the workflow handles real payment credentials when applied.
The example defines or validates STRIPE_SECRET_KEY, a secret-bearing API key variable. It uses a placeholder, but the workflow handles real payment credentials when applied.
The example defines or references database connection strings that may include credentials. The placeholders are not live secrets, but the skill handles secret-bearing values.
The required variable check reads process.env dynamically for database and JWT secret keys. This is legitimate validation, but it touches secret-bearing variables.
The example reads secret-bearing environment variables such as database URLs or JWT secrets. This is legitimate config code, but it is real environment access.
The example reads secret-bearing environment variables such as database URLs or JWT secrets. This is legitimate config code, but it is real environment access.
The example reads secret-bearing environment variables such as database URLs or JWT secrets. This is legitimate config code, but it is real environment access.
The example parses the entire process.env object, which can include secrets. It is legitimate validation code, but it handles secret-bearing environment data.
The example parses the entire process.env object, which can include secrets. It is legitimate validation code, but it handles secret-bearing environment data.
The example reads secret-bearing environment variables such as database URLs or JWT secrets. This is legitimate config code, but it is real environment access.
The example reads secret-bearing environment variables such as database URLs or JWT secrets. This is legitimate config code, but it is real environment access.
The example reads secret-bearing environment variables such as database URLs or JWT secrets. This is legitimate config code, but it is real environment access.
The required variable check reads process.env dynamically for database and JWT secret keys. This is legitimate validation, but it touches secret-bearing variables.
The TypeScript example imports and configures dotenv to load .env values into process.env. This is legitimate, but it confirms environment-variable access.
The TypeScript example imports and configures dotenv to load .env values into process.env. This is legitimate, but it confirms environment-variable access.
Most command, network, and role-token alerts are false positives caused by Markdown fences, reference links, SMTP field names, or normal YAML variable names. The confirmed risk is sensitive environment management: the skill is designed to create or edit .env-related data and includes credential, secret key, and connection-string examples. No malicious exfiltration instructions or prompt-injection attempts were found.
description: Configure and manage development, staging, and production environments. Use when settin
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
├── .env.production # Production (gitignore or vault)
The skill explicitly handles .env or process.env data that can contain secrets. This is intended for setup, but it is a real sensitive-file access capability.
The skill instructs use of environment-specific files such as .env.local or .env.production, which commonly contain secrets. This is legitimate but sensitive file handling.
The skill instructs use of environment-specific files such as .env.local or .env.production, which commonly contain secrets. This is legitimate but sensitive file handling.
The skill instructs use of environment-specific files such as .env.local or .env.production, which commonly contain secrets. This is legitimate but sensitive file handling.
The skill instructs use of environment-specific files such as .env.local or .env.production, which commonly contain secrets. This is legitimate but sensitive file handling.
├── .env.production # Production (gitignore or vault)
The skill instructs use of environment-specific files such as .env.local or .env.production, which commonly contain secrets. This is legitimate but sensitive file handling.
Unsafe Logging of Secret-Bearing Environment Variables
The usage example suggests logging env.DATABASE_URL, which can expose credentials embedded in database connection strings if copied into application code.
Line 127 directly demonstrates printing a database URL. It is commented example code, so confidence is high but not absolute.
The Docker Compose example uses a database URL with postgres:password and sets the database password to password, which can normalize weak defaults if copied.
The weak password string is explicit in the Docker example. The example appears local-only, so the risk depends on whether users copy it beyond development.
Capability review items (25)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
The template includes AWS credential variable names with key-like placeholders. Even as examples, these are secret-bearing fields that can be mishandled if copied.
The template includes AWS credential variable names with key-like placeholders. Even as examples, these are secret-bearing fields that can be mishandled if copied.
The example defines or references database connection strings that may include credentials. The placeholders are not live secrets, but the skill handles secret-bearing values.
The example defines or references database connection strings that may include credentials. The placeholders are not live secrets, but the skill handles secret-bearing values.
DATABASE_URL=${DATABASE_URL} # Injected from environment variables
The example defines or references database connection strings that may include credentials. The placeholders are not live secrets, but the skill handles secret-bearing values.
The example validates or requires DATABASE_URL, which often contains credentials. It is legitimate configuration code, but it handles a secret-bearing connection string.
The example suggests printing env.DATABASE_URL, which can expose credentials embedded in a database connection string. This is a real leakage risk if copied.
The example defines or references database connection strings that may include credentials. The placeholders are not live secrets, but the skill handles secret-bearing values.
The example validates or requires DATABASE_URL, which often contains credentials. It is legitimate configuration code, but it handles a secret-bearing connection string.
The example defines or references database connection strings that may include credentials. The placeholders are not live secrets, but the skill handles secret-bearing values.
The example defines or validates STRIPE_SECRET_KEY, a secret-bearing API key variable. It uses a placeholder, but the workflow handles real payment credentials when applied.
The example defines or validates STRIPE_SECRET_KEY, a secret-bearing API key variable. It uses a placeholder, but the workflow handles real payment credentials when applied.
The example defines or references database connection strings that may include credentials. The placeholders are not live secrets, but the skill handles secret-bearing values.
The required variable check reads process.env dynamically for database and JWT secret keys. This is legitimate validation, but it touches secret-bearing variables.
The example reads secret-bearing environment variables such as database URLs or JWT secrets. This is legitimate config code, but it is real environment access.
The example reads secret-bearing environment variables such as database URLs or JWT secrets. This is legitimate config code, but it is real environment access.
The example reads secret-bearing environment variables such as database URLs or JWT secrets. This is legitimate config code, but it is real environment access.
The example parses the entire process.env object, which can include secrets. It is legitimate validation code, but it handles secret-bearing environment data.
The example parses the entire process.env object, which can include secrets. It is legitimate validation code, but it handles secret-bearing environment data.
The example reads secret-bearing environment variables such as database URLs or JWT secrets. This is legitimate config code, but it is real environment access.
The example reads secret-bearing environment variables such as database URLs or JWT secrets. This is legitimate config code, but it is real environment access.
The example reads secret-bearing environment variables such as database URLs or JWT secrets. This is legitimate config code, but it is real environment access.
The required variable check reads process.env dynamically for database and JWT secret keys. This is legitimate validation, but it touches secret-bearing variables.
The TypeScript example imports and configures dotenv to load .env values into process.env. This is legitimate, but it confirms environment-variable access.
The TypeScript example imports and configures dotenv to load .env values into process.env. This is legitimate, but it confirms environment-variable access.
The skill is a legitimate environment configuration guide, but it intentionally handles .env files, process.env values, database URLs, and cloud credentials. Most external-command, network, and prompt-injection alerts are false positives from Markdown fences, placeholders, references, or field names. The main residual risks are secret-bearing file access, hardcoded example credentials, and examples that could encourage logging sensitive values.
The skill instructs use of .env.local or .env.production, which are commonly secret-bearing environment variants. They require strict handling and redaction.
The skill instructs use of .env.local or .env.production, which are commonly secret-bearing environment variants. They require strict handling and redaction.
The skill instructs use of .env.local or .env.production, which are commonly secret-bearing environment variants. They require strict handling and redaction.
The skill instructs use of .env.local or .env.production, which are commonly secret-bearing environment variants. They require strict handling and redaction.
├── .env.production # Production (gitignore or vault)
The skill instructs use of .env.local or .env.production, which are commonly secret-bearing environment variants. They require strict handling and redaction.
The skill requests Read, Write, Edit, and Bash while its description says it handles .env files. This combination can read or change secret-bearing files without strict confirmation.
The file explicitly combines broad tool permissions with environment-file management. This is legitimate for the skill but high impact if used on real secrets.
The examples include password-like database values and a Docker POSTGRES_PASSWORD value of password. Users may copy these defaults into shared environments.
The cited examples contain password-like literals in environment configuration. This is a clear unsafe-default pattern even if the values are placeholders.
The development configuration allows any origin while credentials are enabled. If copied beyond local development, this can weaken browser security controls.
The example is labeled development, so legitimate local use is possible. The combination of wildcard origin and credentials is still risky if reused.
Capability review items (19)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
The template explicitly includes AWS credential variable names and placeholder values. They are not live keys, but users could replace them with real secrets in files.
The template explicitly includes AWS credential variable names and placeholder values. They are not live keys, but users could replace them with real secrets in files.
The example includes a database URL with a password-like value that users may copy into environment files. Connection strings often contain credentials.
The example includes a database URL with a password-like value that users may copy into environment files. Connection strings often contain credentials.
The loop dynamically checks process.env entries that include required secret names. It does not print values, but it still accesses sensitive environment state.
The example reads a secret-bearing process.env value for application configuration. This is expected for the skill, but it is real sensitive environment access.
The example reads a secret-bearing process.env value for application configuration. This is expected for the skill, but it is real sensitive environment access.
The example reads a secret-bearing process.env value for application configuration. This is expected for the skill, but it is real sensitive environment access.
The example imports or runs dotenv, which loads .env contents into process.env. That is intended, but .env files commonly contain secrets.
Static false positives ignored (2)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Static analysis found many shell, network, and credential patterns, but review shows they are primarily fenced documentation examples for environment setup rather than executable skill code. The remaining real risk is that this skill intentionally guides agents to read, write, and validate .env files and secret-bearing configuration, so publication should include a clear warning about secret handling.
2
Files scanned
378
Lines analyzed
7
Review items
3
False positives ignored
Capability review items (3)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
The skill is designed to create and manage .env templates, local override files, production environment files, and gitignore rules. This is legitimate for an environment setup skill, but it can expose secrets if an agent reads or writes real values without user review.
The cited lines directly instruct handling .env files and variants. The risk is contextual rather than malicious because the same section tells users not to commit secret files.
The examples include database URLs, JWT secrets, SMTP credentials, Stripe keys, and AWS key names. They are placeholders, but users may copy the pattern into real files where secrets must be protected.
The examples clearly name and validate sensitive variables. The values appear to be placeholders, so this is a handling risk rather than evidence of embedded live credentials.
The skill declares Read, Write, Edit, and Bash access while guiding environment setup. That combination is expected for the task, but it can modify project configuration and should require user confirmation before touching secret-bearing files.
The allowed tools are explicit in the skill front matter. No malicious command is present, but the permission set increases impact if the skill is misused.
Static false positives ignored (3)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Static Shell Execution Alerts Are Documentation False Positives
The reported Ruby or shell backtick execution alerts align with Markdown fenced examples and inline tags, not actual Ruby backtick execution. No executable Ruby code or command substitution pattern was found in the skill files.
Line review shows Markdown code fences and tag formatting rather than runtime command execution. The skill contains examples only, not a script file that executes these blocks.
Hardcoded URL Alerts Are Benign Examples and References
The hardcoded URL findings are localhost, a placeholder application domain, a placeholder Sentry DSN, and documentation links. No evidence found that the skill sends data to those URLs.
The URLs appear in templates or references and there is no network request code around them. This supports a false-positive assessment for exfiltration.
Prompt Injection Scanner Alerts Are False Positives
The static role-token alerts appear to match variable names such as SMTP_USER and POSTGRES_USER. No evidence found of instructions like ignore previous instructions, system override, or pre-approved safety claims.
Manual review of the cited lines shows configuration field names only. The surrounding file does not contain text formatted as an instruction override.
Static analysis found many shell, network, and credential patterns, but review shows they are primarily fenced documentation examples for environment setup rather than executable skill code. The remaining real risk is that this skill intentionally guides agents to read, write, and validate .env files and secret-bearing configuration, so publication should include a clear warning about secret handling.
2
Files scanned
378
Lines analyzed
7
Review items
3
False positives ignored
Capability review items (3)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
The skill is designed to create and manage .env templates, local override files, production environment files, and gitignore rules. This is legitimate for an environment setup skill, but it can expose secrets if an agent reads or writes real values without user review.
The cited lines directly instruct handling .env files and variants. The risk is contextual rather than malicious because the same section tells users not to commit secret files.
The examples include database URLs, JWT secrets, SMTP credentials, Stripe keys, and AWS key names. They are placeholders, but users may copy the pattern into real files where secrets must be protected.
The examples clearly name and validate sensitive variables. The values appear to be placeholders, so this is a handling risk rather than evidence of embedded live credentials.
The skill declares Read, Write, Edit, and Bash access while guiding environment setup. That combination is expected for the task, but it can modify project configuration and should require user confirmation before touching secret-bearing files.
The allowed tools are explicit in the skill front matter. No malicious command is present, but the permission set increases impact if the skill is misused.
Static false positives ignored (3)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Static Shell Execution Alerts Are Documentation False Positives
The reported Ruby or shell backtick execution alerts align with Markdown fenced examples and inline tags, not actual Ruby backtick execution. No executable Ruby code or command substitution pattern was found in the skill files.
Line review shows Markdown code fences and tag formatting rather than runtime command execution. The skill contains examples only, not a script file that executes these blocks.
Hardcoded URL Alerts Are Benign Examples and References
The hardcoded URL findings are localhost, a placeholder application domain, a placeholder Sentry DSN, and documentation links. No evidence found that the skill sends data to those URLs.
The URLs appear in templates or references and there is no network request code around them. This supports a false-positive assessment for exfiltration.
Prompt Injection Scanner Alerts Are False Positives
The static role-token alerts appear to match variable names such as SMTP_USER and POSTGRES_USER. No evidence found of instructions like ignore previous instructions, system override, or pre-approved safety claims.
Manual review of the cited lines shows configuration field names only. The surrounding file does not contain text formatted as an instruction override.
This skill is a documentation/education resource that provides templates and best practices for environment configuration. Static analysis flagged many patterns (credential examples, dotenv usage, environment variable access) but these are all placeholder examples in documentation, not actual executable code. The skill declares Read Write Edit Bash permissions, which is appropriate for configuration management. No malicious intent detected - all flagged patterns are legitimate documentation content. Users should be aware this skill can modify configuration files.
The skill declares allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash, providing broad file system and command execution capabilities. This is necessary for configuration management but means the skill could modify any file if given malicious instructions.
Capability review items (2)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
SKILL.md contains example .env templates with placeholder credentials (DATABASE_URL, AWS keys, SMTP passwords). These are documentation examples showing users how to structure their own configuration, not actual secrets. The skill does not exfiltrate or misuse these values.
Code examples show process.env usage patterns. These are educational examples teaching users how to access environment variables in TypeScript applications, not actual runtime environment access by the skill.
Static false positives ignored (1)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Documentation contains example URLs (localhost:3000, sentry.io, myapp.com). These are placeholder examples showing URL formats, not actual network endpoints.