Skills threat-mitigation-mapping
📦

threat-mitigation-mapping

Content revision r1 Safe ⚙️ External commands

Map Threats to Security Controls

Security teams often know their threats but lack a clear path from risk to controls. This skill maps each threat to layered mitigations, coverage gaps, and practical next steps.

Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)
🥉 78 Bronze

Install with my Agent

Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.

Agent request
Review the Skillstore skill "threat-mitigation-mapping" from https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-threat-mitigation-mapping.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/sickn33-threat-mitigation-mapping/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.

Agent-readable resources

Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.

Markdown detail GET /skills/sickn33-threat-mitigation-mapping.md Signed manifest GET /api/skills/sickn33-threat-mitigation-mapping/manifest Signed lockfile GET /api/skills/sickn33-threat-mitigation-mapping/lockfile

Test it

Using "threat-mitigation-mapping". Threats include account takeover, SQL injection, and data exposure. Existing controls include MFA and TLS.

Expected outcome:

  • Account takeover has partial coverage from MFA, but needs lockout monitoring and recovery procedures.
  • SQL injection has no stated mitigation. Add input validation, parameterized queries, WAF rules, and testing.
  • Data exposure is partly covered by TLS, but needs encryption at rest and access control review.

Using "threat-mitigation-mapping". A team needs a roadmap for five high-risk application threats with limited budget.

Expected outcome:

  • Phase 1 addresses critical threats with low coverage and low implementation friction.
  • Phase 2 adds detective controls and validates control effectiveness.
  • Phase 3 improves process controls, documentation, and recurring review.

Using "threat-mitigation-mapping". An architect wants to test whether implemented controls are working.

Expected outcome:

  • Define one test for each control objective.
  • Record expected and actual results for each test.
  • Summarize pass rate, failed controls, and remediation actions.

Security Audit

Safe
v5 • 7/7/2026 Open versioned report

All ten static findings are false positives. The playbook uses defensive Python examples for threat, control, and roadmap mapping, and the SKILL.md backticks are Markdown path formatting.

2
Files scanned
779
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Risk Factors

⚙️ External commands (2)
SKILL.md:29 SKILL.md:33
No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.
Audited by: codex View Audit History →
Share & cite this report

Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.

Open versioned report
Security Assessment

Copy report link

https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-threat-mitigation-mapping/audits/5?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/sickn33-threat-mitigation-mapping/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-threat-mitigation-mapping?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-threat-mitigation-mapping?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/sickn33-threat-mitigation-mapping/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Embed card

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/sickn33-threat-mitigation-mapping.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA citation

sickn33. (2026). threat-mitigation-mapping security audit report (audit version 5) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-threat-mitigation-mapping/audits/5

BibTeX citation

@techreport{sickn33-sickn33-threat-mitigation-mapping-2026, author = {sickn33}, title = {threat-mitigation-mapping security audit report (audit version 5)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {5}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-threat-mitigation-mapping/audits/5}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "threat-mitigation-mapping security audit report (audit version 5)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "sickn33" date-released: "2026-07-07" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-threat-mitigation-mapping/audits/5" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:sickn33-threat-mitigation-mapping:audit:5" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Compare variants

2 installable variants

Each author remains a separate installable skill. The recommended variant is ranked by Skillstore evidence.

Why this variant is first

Highest Skillstore Score
sickn33 Recommended Current

sickn33-threat-mitigation-mapping

Skillstore Score 78
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 13
Updated

2026-08-21

wshobson

wshobson-threat-mitigation-mapping

Skillstore Score 76
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 12
Updated

2026-08-21

Skillstore Score

Why this score Evidence Confidence: High
55
Architecture
85
Maintainability
87
Content
69
Community
83
Spec Compliance

What You Can Build

Prioritize Remediation Work

Convert a threat list into ranked control recommendations and roadmap phases.

Review Architecture Coverage

Check whether an application design has layered controls across relevant defense layers.

Validate Control Effectiveness

Plan control tests and summarize whether implemented mitigations reduce the intended threats.

Try These Prompts

Map Basic Threats 
Map these threats to security controls. For each threat, include preventive, detective, and corrective options: [paste threat list].
Find Coverage Gaps 
Review these threats and existing controls. Identify unmapped threats, weak coverage, missing layers, and missing control types: [paste details].
Create a Remediation Roadmap 
Create a phased mitigation roadmap from these threats, risks, controls, costs, and constraints. Prioritize critical gaps first: [paste context].
Assess Control Effectiveness 
Design an effectiveness review for these controls. Include test goals, expected results, evidence needed, and reporting format: [paste controls].

Best Practices

  • Start with a clear threat list, impact rating, and current control inventory.
  • Map each threat across multiple layers and control types where practical.
  • Review mappings regularly because threats, systems, and control effectiveness change.

Avoid

  • Treating one control as complete coverage for a critical threat.
  • Choosing controls without considering cost, dependencies, and maintenance effort.
  • Skipping effectiveness testing after a mitigation is implemented.

Frequently Asked Questions

What input does this skill need?
It works best with a threat list, impact ratings, existing controls, constraints, and any compliance requirements.
Can it create a threat model?
It can support threat modeling, but its main purpose is mapping known threats to mitigations.
Does it execute security tests?
No. It helps design and document control effectiveness tests, but it does not run tools.
Which control frameworks does it reference?
The playbook references concepts from NIST Cybersecurity Framework, CIS Controls, MITRE D3FEND, OWASP, and common compliance mappings.
Can it help with budget planning?
Yes. The playbook includes examples for prioritizing controls by risk reduction, cost, and roadmap phase.
Is this a replacement for security review?
No. Use it to structure analysis, then validate decisions with qualified security and business stakeholders.

Developer Details

Author

sickn33

License

MIT

Skillstore revision

r1

Version notice

The author did not declare a version.

Repository

https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills/tree/main/skills/threat-mitigation-mapping

Ref

9f814fc6a43fd99946f2da5e0df231c65a38bc76

Maintenance freshness

7/18/2026

Usage

7 downloads · 124 views

File structure

📁 resources/

📄 implementation-playbook.md

📄 SKILL.md

More from sickn33

View all

Related Skills

View all