Skills code-review-excellence
📦

code-review-excellence

Content revision r1 Safe ⚡ Contains scripts⚙️ External commands🌐 Network access

Improve Code Reviews With Structured Feedback

Code reviews can miss important risks or become hard to act on. This skill gives Claude, Codex, and Claude Code a structured review method with clear severity, rationale, and follow-up questions.

Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)
🥉 79 Bronze

Install with my Agent

Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.

Agent request
Review the Skillstore skill "code-review-excellence" from https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-code-review-excellence.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/sickn33-code-review-excellence/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.

Agent-readable resources

Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.

Markdown detail GET /skills/sickn33-code-review-excellence.md Signed manifest GET /api/skills/sickn33-code-review-excellence/manifest Signed lockfile GET /api/skills/sickn33-code-review-excellence/lockfile

Test it

Using "code-review-excellence". A pull request changes payment calculation and adds limited tests.

Expected outcome:

  • Blocking: clarify rounding behavior for tax and discounts before merge.
  • Important: add tests for zero-value orders, multiple discounts, and currency boundaries.
  • Minor: rename unclear variables where the domain meaning is hidden.

Using "code-review-excellence". A reviewer wrote harsh comments on a junior developer pull request.

Expected outcome:

  • Rewritten feedback focuses on the code behavior, explains the risk, and suggests one concrete fix.
  • The response separates required changes from learning notes and optional style suggestions.

Using "code-review-excellence". A large feature changes APIs, storage, and background jobs.

Expected outcome:

  • Recommended review split: interfaces first, implementation second, integration and tests third.
  • Open questions cover scaling, rollback, observability, and compatibility with existing patterns.

Security Audit

Safe
v4 • 7/6/2026 Open versioned report

All static findings are false positives caused by Markdown examples, code-review checklist text, and inline code spans. The skill contains review guidance only and does not instruct the agent to execute code, run commands, or send network requests. No prompt injection or malicious intent was found.

2
Files scanned
557
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Risk Factors

⚡ Contains scripts (1)
resources/implementation-playbook.md:405
⚙️ External commands (8)
resources/implementation-playbook.md:53 resources/implementation-playbook.md:184-192 resources/implementation-playbook.md:230 resources/implementation-playbook.md:297-304 resources/implementation-playbook.md:304-306 resources/implementation-playbook.md:306-328 SKILL.md:29 SKILL.md:40
🌐 Network access (2)
resources/implementation-playbook.md:297 resources/implementation-playbook.md:304
No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.
Audited by: codex View Audit History →
Share & cite this report

Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.

Open versioned report
Security Assessment

Copy report link

https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-code-review-excellence/audits/4?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/sickn33-code-review-excellence/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-code-review-excellence?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-code-review-excellence?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/sickn33-code-review-excellence/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Embed card

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/sickn33-code-review-excellence.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA citation

sickn33. (2026). code-review-excellence security audit report (audit version 4) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-code-review-excellence/audits/4

BibTeX citation

@techreport{sickn33-sickn33-code-review-excellence-2026, author = {sickn33}, title = {code-review-excellence security audit report (audit version 4)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {4}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-code-review-excellence/audits/4}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "code-review-excellence security audit report (audit version 4)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "sickn33" date-released: "2026-07-06" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-code-review-excellence/audits/4" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:sickn33-code-review-excellence:audit:4" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Compare variants

2 installable variants

Each author remains a separate installable skill. The recommended variant is ranked by Skillstore evidence.

Why this variant is first

Highest Skillstore Score
sickn33 Recommended Current

sickn33-code-review-excellence

Skillstore Score 79
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 20
Updated

2026-08-21

wshobson

wshobson-code-review-excellence

Skillstore Score 77
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 16
Updated

2026-08-21

Skillstore Score

Why this score Evidence Confidence: High
55
Architecture
85
Maintainability
87
Content
69
Community
91
Spec Compliance

What You Can Build

Review Pull Requests Consistently

Apply a repeatable review process that separates blocking issues from suggestions and nits.

Coach Reviewers on Better Feedback

Teach reviewers to write specific, respectful comments with severity and clear next steps.

Create Team Review Standards

Build shared checklists for correctness, security, performance, testing, and maintainability.

Try These Prompts

Basic Pull Request Review 
Review this pull request diff. Group findings by blocking, important, and minor. Include rationale and test coverage notes.
Security-Focused Review 
Review this change for authentication, authorization, input validation, secrets, data exposure, and common vulnerabilities. Cite the exact risky behavior.
Mentoring Feedback Rewrite 
Rewrite these review comments to be specific, actionable, and respectful. Preserve technical concerns and add severity labels.
Architecture Review Plan 
Evaluate this feature design and diff. Identify architectural risks, review stages, alternatives, test strategy, and unresolved questions.

Best Practices

  • Provide the pull request description, linked issue, diff, tests, and known constraints before asking for review.
  • Ask for severity-grouped findings so authors can separate required fixes from optional suggestions.
  • Use the security and performance checklists when the change handles input, secrets, data, or hot paths.

Avoid

  • Do not ask for broad approval without sharing the actual code or behavioral requirements.
  • Do not treat style preferences as blocking issues when automated tools or team standards should decide them.
  • Do not use the skill to implement fixes when the task requires an independent review.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill help review?
It helps review pull requests, code changes, review standards, and mentoring feedback.
Does it run tests or inspect repositories automatically?
No. It reviews the code, diff, context, and test results that the user provides.
Can it review security risks?
Yes. It includes checklists for authentication, authorization, input validation, secrets, data protection, and common vulnerabilities.
Can it help write better review comments?
Yes. It can turn vague or harsh feedback into specific, actionable, and respectful comments.
Is it useful for architecture reviews?
Yes. It supports staged review planning, design questions, alternatives, and tradeoff discussion.
Which tools can use this skill?
The report marks support for Claude, Codex, and Claude Code.

Developer Details

Author

sickn33

License

MIT

Skillstore revision

r1

Version notice

The author did not declare a version.

Repository

https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills/tree/main/skills/code-review-excellence

Ref

01171b582d636c013315c5e0d969c64f8d9cdff2

Maintenance freshness

7/18/2026

Usage

15 downloads · 103 views

File structure

📁 resources/

📄 implementation-playbook.md

📄 SKILL.md

More from sickn33

View all

Related Skills

View all