Versioned security assessment

Report ID: SA-A761A0AA

6/30/2026, 1:01:51 PM

attack-tree-construction security assessment v2

Skill Security Certification Report

Audit History
Audit model: codex Historical report
Skill name
attack-tree-construction
Version
v2
Maintainer
sickn33
Source
github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills/tree/main/skills/attack-tree-construction
Coverage
2 Files scanned · 711 Lines analyzed
Policy version
Unavailable

Confirmed finding summary

No confirmed security findings

The completed audit recorded no confirmed security findings. This is not proof that the Skill has no side effects.

Installation context

Historical evidence

This report may not describe the currently installable artifact. Open the current Skill page for install guidance.

Open current Skill page

This report does not block or authorize the manifest or ZIP.

Static command, network, crypto, reconnaissance, and keylogger detections are false positives from Markdown fences, Python examples, and reference links. No prompt injection, shell execution, malware implementation, or data exfiltration evidence was found. The skill is dual-use because it helps model attack paths, so publication should include authorized-use expectations.

Report position

Historical report

Open audit history before using this report to install.

Audit attestation

Not attestable

The required immutable binding is incomplete.

Human verification

Not verified

No human verification is recorded for this report.

Coverage

2 Files scanned · 711 Lines analyzed

1 item shown for review

Limitations

This report does not claim runtime or sandbox execution and does not prove the absence of side effects.

Evidence chain

Follow the evidence from source binding to the install contract. Available evidence supports verification; it is not a safety guarantee.

  1. Source

    Binding unavailable

  2. Artifact

    Identity incomplete

  3. Audit

    Complete

  4. Install contract

    Open manifest to verify

    Open manifest

Capabilities observed

Observed means this report recorded supporting evidence. Not recorded does not prove that a capability is absent.

Contains scripts

May execute code included with the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Network access

May connect to external services.

Observed in 3 evidence locations

Filesystem access

May read or write local files.

Not recorded by this audit

Env variables

May read values from the process environment.

Not recorded by this audit

External commands

May invoke commands or programs outside the Skill.

Observed in 7 evidence locations

Capability review items (1)
Medium
SKILL.md:17-21resources/implementation-playbook.md:336-397
Dual-Use Attack Path Modeling Guidance
The skill is designed for authorized attack tree construction and includes example paths for account takeover, credential theft, authentication bypass, and social engineering. This is legitimate security planning content, but it can help structure offensive thinking if used outside an approved scope.
The files explicitly describe authorized scope limits and provide attack tree examples. The concern is semantic dual-use risk, not confirmed malicious implementation.

Risk findings

Confirmed security concerns are separated from items that still need review.

No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.

Expert evidence

Immutable subject identity, scanner metadata, dismissed matches, and source-level evidence.

Artifact subject

Marketplace commit
Unavailable
Content hash
Unavailable
Tree hash
Unavailable
Skill path
Unavailable
Audit payload hash
Unavailable

Analysis metadata

Audit model: codex

Analysis state: Complete

Scope is limited to the recorded files, lines, methods, and evidence. No runtime or sandbox execution is claimed.

Static false positives ignored (3)
Low
resources/implementation-playbook.md:9-21resources/implementation-playbook.md:44-237resources/implementation-playbook.md:241-404resources/implementation-playbook.md:408-495resources/implementation-playbook.md:499-649SKILL.md:29SKILL.md:38
False Positive: Markdown Backticks Detected as Shell Execution
The reported external command findings are Markdown code fences and inline file references. They do not execute commands, spawn processes, or pass user input to a shell.
The cited lines are visible Markdown fences or inline resource references. No executable shell syntax is present in the skill entrypoint.
Low
resources/implementation-playbook.md:669-671
False Positive: Hardcoded URLs Are Reference Links
The detected URLs point to public security references for attack trees, MITRE ATT&CK, and OWASP guidance. No code fetches these URLs or sends data to them.
The URLs appear only under a Resources heading as Markdown links. There is no network client or request code around them.
Low
resources/implementation-playbook.md:25-33resources/implementation-playbook.md:359resources/implementation-playbook.md:589-632SKILL.md:3-21
False Positive: Keyword-Based Malware and Reconnaissance Matches
The keylogger, reconnaissance, and weak-crypto alerts are triggered by attack-tree labels, Python enum names, and analysis helper methods. No malware code, credential capture routine, weak cryptographic call, or system reconnaissance command was found.
The suspicious terms are descriptive labels within threat modeling examples. The reviewed code samples only model and rank attack tree nodes.

Verify and export

JSON report CITATION.cff SARIF 2.1.0 Signed installation manifest

The manifest and lockfile bind install artifacts to cryptographic hashes. This integrity claim is separate from the security assessment.

Audit attestation: not_attestable