Versioned security assessment

Report ID: SA-AF89722E

6/30/2026, 12:53:23 PM

arm-cortex-expert security assessment v2

Skill Security Certification Report

Audit History
Audit model: codex Historical report
Skill name
arm-cortex-expert
Version
v2
Maintainer
sickn33
Coverage
1 Files scanned · 307 Lines analyzed
Policy version
Unavailable

Confirmed finding summary

No confirmed security findings

The completed audit recorded no confirmed security findings. This is not proof that the Skill has no side effects.

Installation context

Historical evidence

This report may not describe the currently installable artifact. Open the current Skill page for install guidance.

Open current Skill page

This report does not block or authorize the manifest or ZIP.

AI review found no malicious intent, prompt injection attempt, credential access, data exfiltration, or executable payload. The static findings are false positives caused by Markdown inline code, ARM/SAMD terminology, and embedded debugging guidance rather than dangerous runtime behavior.

Report position

Historical report

Open audit history before using this report to install.

Audit attestation

Not attestable

The required immutable binding is incomplete.

Human verification

Not verified

No human verification is recorded for this report.

Coverage

1 Files scanned · 307 Lines analyzed

0 items shown for review

Limitations

This report does not claim runtime or sandbox execution and does not prove the absence of side effects.

Evidence chain

Follow the evidence from source binding to the install contract. Available evidence supports verification; it is not a safety guarantee.

  1. Source

    Binding unavailable

  2. Artifact

    Identity incomplete

  3. Audit

    Complete

  4. Install contract

    Open manifest to verify

    Open manifest

Capabilities observed

Observed means this report recorded supporting evidence. Not recorded does not prove that a capability is absent.

Contains scripts

May execute code included with the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Network access

May connect to external services.

Not recorded by this audit

Filesystem access

May read or write local files.

Not recorded by this audit

Env variables

May read values from the process environment.

Not recorded by this audit

External commands

May invoke commands or programs outside the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Risk findings

Confirmed security concerns are separated from items that still need review.

No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.

Expert evidence

Immutable subject identity, scanner metadata, dismissed matches, and source-level evidence.

Artifact subject

Marketplace commit
Unavailable
Content hash
Unavailable
Tree hash
Unavailable
Skill path
Unavailable
Audit payload hash
Unavailable

Analysis metadata

Audit model: codex

Analysis state: Complete

Scope is limited to the recorded files, lines, methods, and evidence. No runtime or sandbox execution is claimed.

Static false positives ignored (5)
Low
False Positive: Markdown Inline Code Misclassified as Command Execution
Verdict: FALSE_POSITIVE. The flagged locations are documentation examples and inline firmware API names, not Ruby or shell backtick execution. No evidence found of a command being run by the skill.
The file is Markdown guidance only, and the flagged backticks delimit prose examples. There is no script file, subprocess call, shell invocation, or user-controlled command construction.
Low
False Positive: SAMD Text Misclassified as Windows SAM Access
Verdict: FALSE_POSITIVE. The flagged text refers to Microchip SAMD microcontrollers and related platform support. No evidence found of Windows SAM database access or credential harvesting.
Each location uses SAMD as an embedded hardware family name. The surrounding context is microcontroller documentation, not Windows filesystem or account database access.
Low
False Positive: Firmware Terms Misclassified as Weak Cryptography
Verdict: FALSE_POSITIVE. The flagged lines discuss description text, maintainability, stale register reads, watchdog recovery, and driver design. No weak cryptographic algorithm is named or recommended.
The apparent matches come from ordinary words inside embedded firmware prose. There is no MD5, SHA-1, DES, RC4, or cryptographic API usage in the inspected content.
Low
False Positive: Comment Text Misclassified as Deprecated Script Syntax
Verdict: FALSE_POSITIVE. The flagged location is a Rust documentation comment describing safe critical-section access. It is not a JavaScript with statement or executable script content.
Line 162 is inside a Markdown Rust code example and contains a comment. The skill package contains only SKILL.md, so there is no executable JavaScript scope behavior to exploit.
Low
False Positive: Debugging Guidance Misclassified as Reconnaissance
Verdict: FALSE_POSITIVE. The flagged lines describe valid MMIO address ranges and hardfault causes for embedded debugging. No evidence found of host reconnaissance or environment enumeration.
The addresses and fault examples are ARM Cortex-M hardware concepts used for firmware validation. They do not query the host system, network, files, users, or secrets.

Verify and export

The manifest and lockfile bind install artifacts to cryptographic hashes. This integrity claim is separate from the security assessment.

Audit attestation: not_attestable