review
Review Code Changes Against Standards and Specs
Code changes can follow style rules but still miss the requested behavior. This skill compares a diff against repo standards and a source spec in separate reviews.
Install with my Agent
Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.
Review the Skillstore skill "review" from https://skillstore.io/skills/mattpocock-review.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/mattpocock-review/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.
Agent-readable resources
Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.
Test it
Using "review". Review against main.
Expected outcome:
Standards review reports one missing architecture note. Spec review reports no missing requirement. Summary lists one standards finding and zero spec findings.
Using "review". Review against origin/main using the checkout spec.
Expected outcome:
Standards review finds no documented violations. Spec review identifies a missing refund requirement and one behavior outside the requested scope.
Using "review". Review since v1.8.0 with no available spec.
Expected outcome:
Standards review lists two convention issues. Spec review is skipped because no issue, PRD, or spec was available.
Security Audit
Medium RiskMost static findings are false positives caused by Markdown inline-code backticks around filenames, headings, and examples. One external command instruction is confirmed because the skill tells the agent to run git diff and git log, and a semantic finding notes that the user-supplied fixed point should not be passed through without validation.
Confirmed security concerns (1)
Capability review items (1)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
Risk Factors
โ๏ธ External commands (14)
Share & cite this report
Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.
Copy report link
https://skillstore.io/skills/mattpocock-review/audits/4?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown badge
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/mattpocock-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML badge
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/mattpocock-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/mattpocock-review/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Embed card
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/mattpocock-review.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Academic citations (APA ยท BibTeX ยท CFF)
APA citation
mattpocock. (2026). review security audit report (audit version 4) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/mattpocock-review/audits/4BibTeX citation
@techreport{mattpocock-mattpocock-review-2026,
author = {mattpocock},
title = {review security audit report (audit version 4)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {4},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/mattpocock-review/audits/4},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "review security audit report (audit version 4)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "mattpocock"
date-released: "2026-07-05"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/mattpocock-review/audits/4"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:mattpocock-review:audit:4"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Compare variants
2 installable variantsEach author remains a separate installable skill. The recommended variant is ranked by Skillstore evidence.
Why this variant is first
chachamaru127-review
2026-08-21
mattpocock-review
2026-08-21
Skillstore Score
Why this score Evidence Confidence: MediumWhat You Can Build
Pull Request Readiness
Check a branch against main before requesting review, with standards and spec issues separated.
Spec Compliance Review
Compare implementation details with an issue, PRD, or spec before delivery.
Standards Enforcement
Find places where a change conflicts with documented team conventions.
Try These Prompts
Review my current branch against main using the review skill.
Review changes since commit <commit_sha>. Use the issue or PRD referenced by the commits when available.
Review this branch against origin/main. Use specs/payments-redesign.md as the spec source.
Review release/candidate against v2.4.0. Separate documented standards violations from spec gaps, and keep the axes independent.
Best Practices
- Provide the fixed point and spec path when you know them.
- Keep repository standards documents current and easy to find.
- Review the two result sections independently before prioritizing work.
Avoid
- Using the skill without a fixed point.
- Treating the spec review as a substitute for tests.
- Merging the two review axes into one ranked list.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does this skill review?
Does it require a spec?
Which tools does it support?
Does it execute tests?
Can it review work in progress?
Why are Standards and Spec separated?
Developer Details
Author
mattpocockLicense
MIT
Skillstore revision
r1
Version notice
The author did not declare a version.
Ref
62e2a730c5cd74eab4c7164309d810de660fcea3
Maintenance freshness
7/18/2026
Usage
2 downloads ยท 0 views
File structure
๐ SKILL.md