Audit History

Most static findings are false positives from clinical terminology, markdown code fences, TikZ style syntax, and Python list operations. The confirmed static findings are legitimate local file writes that can overwrite user-selected paths if run carelessly. Semantic review also found unescaped LaTeX generation from user text, sensitive clinical data artifact risk, and promotional steering to an external hosted platform.

Most static findings are false positives from clinical terminology, markdown code fences, TikZ style syntax, and Python list operations. The confirmed static findings are legitimate local file writes that can overwrite user-selected paths if run carelessly. Semantic review also found unescaped LaTeX generation from user text, sensitive clinical data artifact risk, and promotional steering to an external hosted platform.

Static analysis reported many high-risk patterns, but review found most are false positives from clinical terminology, Markdown examples, LaTeX commands, and ordinary Python file handling. The remaining risk is medium because the skill allows Bash, includes executable Python scripts, writes local clinical artifacts, and interpolates user-provided decision text into LaTeX without escaping. No confirmed malicious intent, prompt injection, credential exfiltration, or network code was found.

All static findings are false positives. The skill generates legitimate clinical research documents using standard Python libraries (pandas, numpy, scipy). The 'weak cryptographic algorithm' detections are medical terminology matches (e.g., hazard ratio, recommendation strength). 'External commands' flagged are markdown backticks for documentation formatting, not shell execution. Filesystem operations are standard document generation. No malicious code, credential exfiltration, or harmful patterns exist.

All static findings are false positives. The skill generates legitimate clinical research documents using standard Python libraries (pandas, numpy, scipy). The 'weak cryptographic algorithm' detections are medical terminology matches (e.g., hazard ratio, recommendation strength). 'External commands' flagged are markdown backticks for documentation formatting, not shell execution. Filesystem operations are standard document generation. No malicious code, credential exfiltration, or harmful patterns exist.

The static analysis findings are false positives. This skill contains no malicious code - it generates legitimate clinical research documents using standard Python libraries. The 'weak cryptographic algorithm' findings are medical terminology matches, and 'external commands' are LaTeX syntax or documentation references.

The skill contains legitimate clinical research tools for generating professional medical documents and statistical analyses. All scripts perform expected scientific computing functions with no malicious behavior detected.