Versioned security assessment

Report ID: SA-D91B037D

6/29/2026, 8:16:44 PM

happyhorse-1-0 security assessment v2

Skill Security Certification Report

Audit History
Audit model: codex Historical report
Skill name
happyhorse-1-0
Version
v2
Maintainer
doany-ai
Source
github.com/doany-ai/skills/tree/main/happyhorse-1-0/
Coverage
1 Files scanned · 196 Lines analyzed
Policy version
Unavailable

Confirmed finding summary

No confirmed security findings

The completed audit recorded no confirmed security findings. This is not proof that the Skill has no side effects.

Installation context

Historical evidence

This report may not describe the currently installable artifact. Open the current Skill page for install guidance.

Open current Skill page

This report does not block or authorize the manifest or ZIP.

The static analyzer flagged many Markdown backticks, URLs, sample paths, and quoted prompt examples as high-risk patterns. Review found no evidence of malware or prompt injection, but the skill does intentionally run the RunComfy CLI, sends prompts to a third-party API, downloads generated files, and may use local token storage.

Report position

Historical report

Open audit history before using this report to install.

Audit attestation

Not attestable

The required immutable binding is incomplete.

Human verification

Not verified

No human verification is recorded for this report.

Coverage

1 Files scanned · 196 Lines analyzed

3 items shown for review

Limitations

This report does not claim runtime or sandbox execution and does not prove the absence of side effects.

Evidence chain

Follow the evidence from source binding to the install contract. Available evidence supports verification; it is not a safety guarantee.

  1. Source

    Binding unavailable

  2. Artifact

    Identity incomplete

  3. Audit

    Complete

  4. Install contract

    Open manifest to verify

    Open manifest

Capabilities observed

Observed means this report recorded supporting evidence. Not recorded does not prove that a capability is absent.

Contains scripts

May execute code included with the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Network access

May connect to external services.

Observed in 6 evidence locations

Filesystem access

May read or write local files.

Observed in 6 evidence locations

Env variables

May read values from the process environment.

Not recorded by this audit

External commands

May invoke commands or programs outside the Skill.

Observed in 7 evidence locations

Capability review items (3)
Medium
SKILL.md:10SKILL.md:65-69SKILL.md:73-82SKILL.md:86-90SKILL.md:178-182
External CLI Invocation Required
The skill instructs agents to call the local runcomfy CLI to submit jobs and poll results. This is legitimate for a RunComfy integration, but it executes an external command and should only run after the user has reviewed the prompt and output directory.
The command invocation is explicit and repeated in examples. The risk is operational rather than malicious because the command target is a documented model endpoint and no hidden script is present.
Medium
SKILL.md:179SKILL.md:181SKILL.md:194
Third-Party Prompt Submission
The documented workflow sends the user prompt and bearer token to RunComfy model API endpoints, then downloads generated assets from RunComfy domains. Users should avoid submitting confidential prompts unless their RunComfy account and data policy allow it.
The file explicitly documents outbound POST, polling, result fetching, and allowed download hosts. This is expected functionality, but it confirms third-party data transfer.
Low
SKILL.md:191
Local Token File Documentation
The skill documents that runcomfy login stores a token under the user home configuration directory with owner-only permissions. This is normal CLI behavior, but it means users must protect the local account and configuration directory.
The home-directory token path is explicitly documented. The same line states file mode 0600, which reduces but does not eliminate local credential exposure risk.

Risk findings

Confirmed security concerns are separated from items that still need review.

No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.

Expert evidence

Immutable subject identity, scanner metadata, dismissed matches, and source-level evidence.

Artifact subject

Marketplace commit
Unavailable
Content hash
Unavailable
Tree hash
Unavailable
Skill path
Unavailable
Audit payload hash
Unavailable

Analysis metadata

Audit model: codex

Analysis state: Complete

Scope is limited to the recorded files, lines, methods, and evidence. No runtime or sandbox execution is claimed.

Static false positives ignored (1)
Low
SKILL.md:24-26SKILL.md:96-109SKILL.md:180-182
Static Analyzer False Positives Reviewed
The Ruby backtick execution, weak cryptography, and path traversal findings are false positives caused by Markdown inline code, fenced command examples, ellipses in HTTP paths, and ordinary prose. No evidence found of Ruby code, weak cryptographic implementation, prompt injection, or path traversal logic in the single reviewed file.
The reviewed file is Markdown documentation, and the flagged locations are examples or prose. The scanner patterns do not correspond to executable Ruby, cryptographic code, or filesystem traversal implementation.

Verify and export

JSON report CITATION.cff SARIF 2.1.0 Signed installation manifest

The manifest and lockfile bind install artifacts to cryptographic hashes. This integrity claim is separate from the security assessment.

Audit attestation: not_attestable