process-code-review
Process Code Review Findings
Code review documents can leave teams with a long, hard-to-track fix list. This skill turns those findings into an ordered workflow for fixes, skips, checks, and status updates.
Install with my Agent
Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.
Review the Skillstore skill "process-code-review" from https://skillstore.io/skills/diversioteam-process-code-review.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/diversioteam-process-code-review/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.
Agent-readable resources
Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.
Test it
Using "process-code-review". Process a review document with three blocking issues and two minor cleanup items.
Expected outcome:
- A severity-ordered work list with every finding tracked.
- A fix or skip decision prompt for each issue.
- A completion summary with fixed, skipped, and modified-file counts.
Using "process-code-review". Preview a review file before editing source files.
Expected outcome:
A grouped dry-run summary that lists findings by severity and confirms no files were changed.
Using "process-code-review". Apply trusted minor cleanup findings and run checks.
Expected outcome:
- Minor findings are processed in order.
- Available lint, format, type, and project checks are reported.
- The review document records updated status for processed items.
Security Audit
Medium RiskAll 42 static findings are false positives caused by Markdown backticks, code fences, slash-command examples, and documented quality-check commands. No prompt injection, secret access, network exfiltration, or hidden executable code was found in SKILL.md. The main residual risk is workflow-level: auto mode can apply changes from untrusted review documents.
Confirmed security concerns (1)
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (42)
Share & cite this report
Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.
Copy report link
https://skillstore.io/skills/diversioteam-process-code-review/audits/8?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown badge
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/diversioteam-process-code-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML badge
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/diversioteam-process-code-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/diversioteam-process-code-review/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Embed card
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/diversioteam-process-code-review.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA citation
DiversioTeam. (2026). process-code-review security audit report (audit version 8) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/diversioteam-process-code-review/audits/8BibTeX citation
@techreport{diversioteam-diversioteam-process-code-review-2026,
author = {DiversioTeam},
title = {process-code-review security audit report (audit version 8)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {8},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/diversioteam-process-code-review/audits/8},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "process-code-review security audit report (audit version 8)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "DiversioTeam"
date-released: "2026-07-05"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/diversioteam-process-code-review/audits/8"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:diversioteam-process-code-review:audit:8"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore Score
Why this score Evidence Confidence: HighWhat You Can Build
Resolve Generated Review Findings
Work through a generated review document, fix accepted issues, and keep the review file updated.
Triage Team Review Debt
Review a teammate review file, skip unsuitable fixes with reasons, and preserve an audit trail.
Verify Blocking Issues
Focus on high-priority findings first and confirm that security or correctness problems are addressed.
Try These Prompts
Use process-code-review on docs/code_reviews/service_review.md and walk me through each finding interactively.
Run process-code-review in dry-run mode on api_review.md. Summarize findings by severity without changing files.
Process only BLOCKING findings in payments_review.md. Ask before each fix and update the review document status.
For a trusted generated review file, process NIT findings automatically, run available checks, and summarize modified files.
Best Practices
- Use interactive mode for unfamiliar or externally supplied review documents.
- Read source context before accepting proposed fixes from the review document.
- Run quality gates after each meaningful change and record skipped reasons.
Avoid
- Running auto mode on untrusted review documents.
- Treating proposed fixes as authoritative without checking current source code.
- Marking issues fixed before tests or relevant checks are complete.
Frequently Asked Questions
What type of review file does this skill expect?
Does it commit code changes?
Can it preview work before editing?
Which severities does it understand?
Is auto mode safe for any review document?
Can it work with Claude Code and Codex?
Developer Details
Author
DiversioTeamLicense
MIT
Skillstore revision
r1
Version notice
The author did not declare a version.
Ref
c579efd02184f1128d6741d16e6c8d951d7d4208
Maintenance freshness
7/18/2026
Usage
5 downloads · 176 views
File structure
📄 SKILL.md