code-analysis
Improve Code Readability for Non-Developers
Code can be hard for non-developers to review when names, comments, and jargon are unclear. This skill scores readability and suggests clearer naming, comments, and documentation.
Install with my Agent
Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.
Review the Skillstore skill "code-analysis" from https://skillstore.io/skills/abejitsu-code-analysis.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/abejitsu-code-analysis/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.
Agent-readable resources
Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.
Test it
Using "code-analysis". Analyze a Python service file with standard strictness.
Expected outcome:
- Readability score: 82 out of 100.
- The report found unclear abbreviations and several long sections without comments.
- Suggested fixes included clearer names and short What, Why, and How explanations.
Using "code-analysis". Review a TypeScript component in strict mode.
Expected outcome:
- The review highlighted missing function documentation and unexplained technical terms in comments.
- The summary recommended adding plain-language explanations before sharing the file with new team members.
Using "code-analysis". Create a machine-readable readability report for one supported file.
Expected outcome:
The tool can return structured results with file details, language, score, issue count, and per-issue suggestions.
Security Audit
SafeStatic findings were reviewed against SKILL.md and analyze.py. All seven findings are false positives in Markdown fences, a local usage example, or a normal analyzer comment. No prompt injection, exfiltration, network use, or malicious intent was found.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (6)
Share & cite this report
Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.
Copy report link
https://skillstore.io/skills/abejitsu-code-analysis/audits/9?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown badge
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/abejitsu-code-analysis?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML badge
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/abejitsu-code-analysis?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/abejitsu-code-analysis/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Embed card
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/abejitsu-code-analysis.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA citation
abereyes. (2026). code-analysis security audit report (audit version 9) [Author version 1.0.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/abejitsu-code-analysis/audits/9BibTeX citation
@techreport{abereyes-abejitsu-code-analysis-2026,
author = {abereyes},
title = {code-analysis security audit report (audit version 9)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {9},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/abejitsu-code-analysis/audits/9},
note = {Author version 1.0.0}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "code-analysis security audit report (audit version 9)"
version: "1.0.0"
type: report
authors:
- name: "abereyes"
date-released: "2026-07-07"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/abejitsu-code-analysis/audits/9"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:abejitsu-code-analysis:audit:9"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore Score
Why this score Evidence Confidence: HighWhat You Can Build
Prepare stakeholder-friendly code
Check whether a source file uses names and comments that business reviewers can understand.
Review onboarding examples
Find unclear abbreviations, missing explanations, and jargon before sharing examples with new team members.
Improve delivery documentation
Identify functions and classes that need clearer What, Why, and How documentation before handoff.
Try These Prompts
Use code-analysis to review src/app.py with standard strictness. Summarize the score and top readability fixes.
Analyze src/service.ts and focus the summary on missing comments, unclear jargon, and documentation gaps.
Use strict mode on src/payment.go. List the highest-impact naming and documentation changes for a new team member.
Analyze src/controller.py and group readability issues by urgency. Recommend the first three changes to make for stakeholders.
Best Practices
- Run the analyzer on individual source files with supported extensions.
- Start with standard strictness, then use strict mode for shared or critical code.
- Review each suggestion in context because some technical terms may be acceptable.
Avoid
- Do not run it on unsupported file types and expect complete results.
- Do not treat the readability score as a substitute for human review.
- Do not optimize only the score while ignoring whether the code is actually clearer.