Review Tasks and Branches with Persistent Verdicts
Implementation reviews lose traceability when findings exist only in conversation. This skill structures task, fix, and branch reviews around contract references and persistent verdict files.
Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.
Review the Skillstore skill "executor-review" from https://skillstore.io/skills/atri10-executor-review.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/atri10-executor-review/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.
Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.
Using "executor-review". Review a task whose error path lacks the behavior required by its brief.
Expected outcome:
Using "executor-review". Re-review a fix that resolves one finding but breaks an affected caller.
Expected outcome:
Using "executor-review". Perform a final branch review when the architecture phase was explicitly skipped.
Expected outcome:
All 208 static findings are false positives involving Markdown, legitimate review commands, fixed sibling references, or protective secret-handling guidance. No evidence found of credential exfiltration, destructive intent, or audit-targeting prompt injection in the four reviewed files. Two semantic risks remain: security findings can be parked without mandatory human approval, and the main workflow hardcodes the final-review fork base.
Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.
https://skillstore.io/skills/atri10-executor-review/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report[](https://skillstore.io/skills/atri10-executor-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge)<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/atri10-executor-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/atri10-executor-review/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a><iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/atri10-executor-review.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>atri10. (2026). executor-review security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/atri10-executor-review/audits/1@techreport{atri10-atri10-executor-review-2026,
author = {atri10},
title = {executor-review security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/atri10-executor-review/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "executor-review security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "atri10"
date-released: "2026-10-05"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/atri10-executor-review/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:atri10-executor-review:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Compare a task diff with its brief and constraints, then preserve compliance and quality findings in a verdict file.
Assess each open finding against a fix diff and inspect affected callers for regressions before closing the round.
Review cross-task dependencies, architecture contracts, and parked findings as one branch before handing recommended checks to verification.
Review task [TASK_ID] using [BRIEF_FILE], [REPORT_FILE], and [DIFF_FILE]. Write compliance and quality verdicts to [VERDICT_FILE]. Report missing inputs as blocked.
Use the task-review template for [TASK_ID]. Include [GLOBAL_CONSTRAINTS] verbatim with requirement IDs. Assess reported test evidence and list honest cannot-verify items.
Use the re-review template with [PRIOR_VERDICT_FILE], [OPEN_FINDING_IDS], [REPORT_FILE], and [DIFF_FILE]. Review causal impact first. Write closure evidence to [VERDICT_FILE].
Use the final-review template for [PLAN_ID]. Resolve the fork base from provenance. Supply contracts and parked findings. Require human approval for security deferrals.
Author
atri10License
MIT
Skillstore revision
r1
Version notice
The author did not declare a version.
Ref
6d0b11444384184b7ae743742a7e233a9a705cd9
Maintenance freshness
10/6/2026
Usage
0 downloads · 1 views
File structure
Audit and Repair Plans Before Execution
Separate plans can hide missing requirements, incompatible interfaces, and broken dependencies. This skill reviews the complete plan set and coordinates repairs with independent verification.
Execute Approved Plans with Subagents and Reviews
Long implementation plans can lose task state and accumulate unreviewed changes. This skill coordinates scoped subagents, review gates, and durable records across execution and recovery.
Clarify Initiatives and Compare Approaches
Unclear requirements and unsupported assumptions make technical decisions difficult. This skill guides structured discovery, evidence gathering, and approach comparisons before human approval.
Write Testable Specifications Before Planning
Ambiguous requirements create conflicting implementations and unverifiable reviews. This skill guides linked specifications, risk assessments, and verification strategies through explicit human approval.
Verify Completion Claims With Recorded Evidence
Completion claims can hide failed, skipped, or untested requirements. This skill guides requirement-level verification with observed output, commit-bound evidence, and explicit human acceptance.
Prepare Executor Integration and Session Handoffs
Session changes can lose decisions, verification evidence, and unfinished implementation work. This skill guides human-controlled integration, durable pause records, and resumption checked against the current repository.
Audit NestJS Code with Evidence-Backed Findings
by amirtaherkhani
NestJS repositories can hide boundary flaws and runtime risks that lint results alone cannot reveal. This skill combines local evidence collection and semantic review into one prioritized report.
Review Code with Structured Quality Checks
by alirezarezvani
Code reviews can miss quality, security, and maintainability issues. This skill guides structured reviews with scripts, checklists, and report generation.
Manage Coding Agent Workflows
by kiwi-phantomworks
Coding-agent projects can drift when tasks, scope, and checks are vague. This skill gives PM templates and review rules that keep Claude, Codex, and Claude Code work bounded and verifiable.
Review Code for Bugs and Security Issues
by 21pounder
Code reviews can miss bugs, security flaws, and maintainability issues. This skill guides Claude, Codex, and Claude Code through structured review steps.
Review GitHub Pull Requests with CLI Utilities
by Bind
Pull request reviews require repeated eligibility checks, guideline discovery, and precise feedback. This skill documents a consistent CLI workflow for those tasks.
Optimize React and Next.js Code
by vercel-labs
React and Next.js applications often lose performance through waterfalls, large bundles, and avoidable re-renders. This skill gives Claude, Codex, and Claude Code concrete review rules for faster frontend work.