Skills executor-plan-regression
๐Ÿ“ฆ

executor-plan-regression

Content revision r1 Safe โš™๏ธ External commands๐Ÿ“ Filesystem access

Audit and Repair Plans Before Execution

Separate plans can hide missing requirements, incompatible interfaces, and broken dependencies. This skill reviews the complete plan set and coordinates repairs with independent verification.

Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)
๐Ÿฅ‰ 77 Bronze

Install with my Agent

Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.

Agent request
Review the Skillstore skill "executor-plan-regression" from https://skillstore.io/skills/atri10-executor-plan-regression.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/atri10-executor-plan-regression/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.

Test it

Using "executor-plan-regression". Review two drafted plans where a later plan consumes an artifact that no earlier plan produces.

Expected outcome:

  • Illustrative audit result: failed because a required producer is missing.
  • Coverage review: one requirement has no implementing task.
  • Dependency review: the later plan consumes an unresolved artifact.
  • Repair routing: assign the producer correction and request an independent re-audit.

Using "executor-plan-regression". Re-audit a repaired plan whose interface literal now matches its contract.

Expected outcome:

  • Illustrative closure result: the prior interface finding is addressed using evidence from the repaired plan.
  • Impact review: coverage, dependencies, ordering, and lint were checked again.
  • Readiness result: mark the plan clean only after independent audit success and the companion gate check.

Security Audit

Safe
v1 โ€ข 10/5/2026 Open versioned report

All 243 static findings are false positives involving Markdown backticks, fixed companion-tool paths, or document-review prose. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential exfiltration, or malicious host reconnaissance in the four reviewed files. Referenced companion scripts are absent from this skill, so their implementation and runtime behavior were not verified.

4
Files scanned
1,533
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Risk Factors

โš™๏ธ External commands (50)
plan-auditor-prompt.md:71-72 plan-auditor-prompt.md:72-75 plan-auditor-prompt.md:75-94 plan-auditor-prompt.md:94-100 plan-auditor-prompt.md:100-104 plan-auditor-prompt.md:104-105 plan-auditor-prompt.md:106-110 plan-auditor-prompt.md:110-113 plan-auditor-prompt.md:113-131 plan-auditor-prompt.md:131 plan-auditor-prompt.md:138 plan-auditor-prompt.md:139 plan-auditor-prompt.md:152-162 plan-auditor-prompt.md:180 plan-auditor-prompt.md:181-182 plan-auditor-prompt.md:182-187 plan-auditor-prompt.md:187-206 plan-auditor-prompt.md:206-216 plan-auditor-prompt.md:216 plan-auditor-prompt.md:221-222 plan-auditor-prompt.md:222-224 plan-auditor-prompt.md:224 plan-auditor-prompt.md:225-232 plan-auditor-prompt.md:232-236 plan-auditor-prompt.md:236-268 plan-auditor-prompt.md:268-269 plan-auditor-prompt.md:269-270 plan-auditor-prompt.md:270-272 plan-auditor-prompt.md:272-277 plan-auditor-prompt.md:277-278 plan-auditor-prompt.md:278 plan-auditor-prompt.md:279-291 plan-auditor-prompt.md:291-292 plan-auditor-prompt.md:292-295 plan-auditor-prompt.md:295-308 plan-auditor-prompt.md:308-309 plan-auditor-prompt.md:309 plan-auditor-prompt.md:310-311 plan-auditor-prompt.md:311 plan-auditor-prompt.md:312-313 plan-auditor-prompt.md:313-320 plan-auditor-prompt.md:409 plan-auditor-prompt.md:410-415 plan-reauditor-prompt.md:71-72 plan-reauditor-prompt.md:72-75 plan-reauditor-prompt.md:75-95 plan-reauditor-prompt.md:95-101 plan-reauditor-prompt.md:101-102 plan-reauditor-prompt.md:102-103 plan-reauditor-prompt.md:103
๐Ÿ“ Filesystem access (12)
No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.
Audited by: codex
Share & cite this report

Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.

Open versioned report
Security Assessment

Copy report link

https://skillstore.io/skills/atri10-executor-plan-regression/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/atri10-executor-plan-regression/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/atri10-executor-plan-regression?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/atri10-executor-plan-regression?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/atri10-executor-plan-regression/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Embed card

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/atri10-executor-plan-regression.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Academic citations (APA ยท BibTeX ยท CFF)

APA citation

atri10. (2026). executor-plan-regression security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/atri10-executor-plan-regression/audits/1

BibTeX citation

@techreport{atri10-atri10-executor-plan-regression-2026, author = {atri10}, title = {executor-plan-regression security audit report (audit version 1)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {1}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/atri10-executor-plan-regression/audits/1}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "executor-plan-regression security audit report (audit version 1)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "atri10" date-released: "2026-10-05" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/atri10-executor-plan-regression/audits/1" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:atri10-executor-plan-regression:audit:1" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore Score

Why this score Evidence Confidence: Medium
55
Architecture
85
Maintainability
87
Content
65
Community
83
Spec Compliance

What You Can Build

Check Plans Before Implementation

Review a drafted plan set for missing requirements and unresolved producer dependencies before developers begin task execution.

Coordinate Contract Repairs

Assign cross-plan fixes, record specification or interface amendments, and obtain independent confirmation without allowing repairers to grade themselves.

Verify Readiness Evidence

Compare latest audit reports, repair logs, and human waiver records before confirming that the initiative can enter execution.

Try These Prompts

Check Audit Readiness
Use executor-plan-regression to check whether my drafted plan set is ready for auditing. Identify missing specifications, contracts, companion tools, and required inputs.
Audit the Complete Plan Set
Audit each drafted plan against the complete plan set, specification, and cited interface contracts. Use the supplied auditor template and report all nine checks.
Repair Assigned Findings
Coordinate repairs for the failed audit findings. Assign one owner per finding, keep repairs within document boundaries, and dispatch independent re-auditors with repair diffs.
Recheck Changed Plans Before Execution
Re-enter plan regression for the changed plans and their affected dependencies. Verify coverage, contract amendments, latest audit references, and human waivers before clearing execution.

Best Practices

  • Provide every plan, its specification, cited contracts, and current lint output before dispatching auditors.
  • Keep repairers and re-auditors independent, and preserve each completed audit round.
  • Review companion tools before running them, inspect repair diffs, and record human waivers explicitly.

Avoid

  • Auditing one plan without the other plans that supply or consume its outputs.
  • Removing requirements or weakening exact interface values to make an audit pass.
  • Marking a plan clean from a repair log without a fresh independent audit.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this skill review?
It reviews plan documents against specifications, interface contracts, other plans, and lint output. It does not audit implementation code.
When should I use it?
Use it after drafting the complete plan set and before execution. Re-enter the phase when plans or their specifications change.
Can it review a single plan?
Yes. Specification coverage, interface fidelity, lint, and skipped-phase checks still apply to a single-plan initiative.
Does the package include the Executor commands?
No. The reviewed package contains instructions and three prompt templates. The referenced Executor tools must be available separately.
Which AI tools are listed as supported?
The report lists Claude, Codex, and Claude Code. Full orchestration also requires suitable file, shell, Git, and separate-agent access.
What happens when findings remain after three audits?
The controller stops the repair loop and requests a human decision. Waivers must be explicit and recorded in initiative rulings.

Developer Details

Author

atri10

License

MIT

Skillstore revision

r1

Version notice

The author did not declare a version.

Ref

6d0b11444384184b7ae743742a7e233a9a705cd9

Maintenance freshness

10/6/2026

Usage

0 downloads ยท 1 views

File structure

More from atri10

View all
View all