Skills doc-coauthoring
📦

doc-coauthoring

Content revision r1 Safe ⚙️ External commands🌐 Network access

Draft Stronger Documents With Guided Coauthoring

Complex documents fail when context, structure, and reader needs are unclear. This skill guides context gathering, section drafting, refinement, and reader testing.

Supports: Claude Codex Code(CC)
🥉 79 Bronze

Install with my Agent

Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.

Agent request
Review the Skillstore skill "doc-coauthoring" from https://skillstore.io/skills/astrabit-cpt-doc-coauthoring.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/astrabit-cpt-doc-coauthoring/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.

Agent-readable resources

Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.

Markdown detail GET /skills/astrabit-cpt-doc-coauthoring.md Signed manifest GET /api/skills/astrabit-cpt-doc-coauthoring/manifest Signed lockfile GET /api/skills/astrabit-cpt-doc-coauthoring/lockfile

Test it

Using "doc-coauthoring". User asks for a proposal and shares audience, timeline, and rough notes.

Expected outcome:

The assistant asks targeted follow-up questions, proposes a section outline, and creates a draft scaffold with placeholders.

Using "doc-coauthoring". User finishes a technical approach section and asks for feedback.

Expected outcome:

The assistant identifies redundancy, missing tradeoffs, and unclear assumptions, then applies focused edits to the existing draft.

Using "doc-coauthoring". User wants to know whether a finished decision record is clear.

Expected outcome:

The assistant generates reader questions, checks likely misunderstandings, and recommends precise changes before publication.

Security Audit

Safe
v8 • 7/5/2026 Open versioned report

All static execution hits are markdown references to create_file or str_replace workflows, not Ruby or shell execution paths. The hardcoded URL points users to Claude for manual reader testing, and the channel/document references require user-provided or authorized integrations. No prompt injection, exfiltration intent, or network reconnaissance evidence was found.

1
Files scanned
376
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Risk Factors

⚙️ External commands (6)
SKILL.md:135 SKILL.md:144 SKILL.md:188 SKILL.md:208 SKILL.md:367 SKILL.md:368
🌐 Network access (1)
SKILL.md:303
No confirmed security findings were detected by the latest completed static and semantic audit. This does not prove the skill has no side effects.
Audited by: codex View Audit History →
Share & cite this report

Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.

Open versioned report
Security Assessment

Copy report link

https://skillstore.io/skills/astrabit-cpt-doc-coauthoring/audits/8?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/astrabit-cpt-doc-coauthoring/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/astrabit-cpt-doc-coauthoring?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/astrabit-cpt-doc-coauthoring?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/astrabit-cpt-doc-coauthoring/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Embed card

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/astrabit-cpt-doc-coauthoring.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA citation

AstraBit-CPT. (2026). doc-coauthoring security audit report (audit version 8) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/astrabit-cpt-doc-coauthoring/audits/8

BibTeX citation

@techreport{astrabit-cpt-astrabit-cpt-doc-coauthoring-2026, author = {AstraBit-CPT}, title = {doc-coauthoring security audit report (audit version 8)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {8}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/astrabit-cpt-doc-coauthoring/audits/8}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "doc-coauthoring security audit report (audit version 8)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "AstraBit-CPT" date-released: "2026-07-05" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/astrabit-cpt-doc-coauthoring/audits/8" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:astrabit-cpt-doc-coauthoring:audit:8" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Compare variants

7 installable variants

Each author remains a separate installable skill. The recommended variant is ranked by Skillstore evidence.

Why this variant is first

Higher Skillstore usage
ZhanlinCui Recommended

zhanlincui-doc-coauthoring

Skillstore Score 79
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 142
Updated

2026-08-21

anthropics

doc-coauthoring

Skillstore Score 79
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 29
Updated

2026-08-21

7Spade

7spade-doc-coauthoring

Skillstore Score 79
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 15
Updated

2026-08-21

sickn33

sickn33-doc-coauthoring

Skillstore Score 79
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 14
Updated

2026-08-21

AstraBit-CPT Current

astrabit-cpt-doc-coauthoring

Skillstore Score 79
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 12
Updated

2026-08-21

davila7

davila7-doc-coauthoring

Skillstore Score 79
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 10
Updated

2026-08-21

Azeem-2

azeem-2-doc-coauthoring

Skillstore Score 78
Evidence Confidence High
Skillstore usage 9
Updated

2026-08-21

Skillstore Score

Why this score Evidence Confidence: High
55
Architecture
85
Maintainability
87
Content
71
Community
91
Spec Compliance

What You Can Build

Draft Technical Specs

Turn architecture context, constraints, and tradeoffs into a structured technical specification.

Prepare Decision Records

Capture options, rationale, risks, and expected impact for a clear decision document.

Improve Internal Proposals

Shape rough notes into a proposal that stakeholders can understand and review.

Try These Prompts

Start a New Document 
Help me write a technical spec. Ask me for the goal, audience, constraints, and any template before drafting.
Turn Notes Into Structure 
I have rough notes for a proposal. Organize them into sections, identify missing context, and ask clarifying questions.
Refine a Section 
Use the coauthoring workflow on the risks section. Brainstorm options, let me choose points, then draft and edit the section.
Run Reader Testing 
Test this completed decision document as a new reader. Generate likely reader questions, find ambiguity, and suggest targeted fixes.

Best Practices

  • Share audience, desired impact, constraints, and source material before asking for draft text.
  • Review each section after drafting so the assistant can learn your style and priorities.
  • Run reader testing before publication, then verify facts and links yourself.

Avoid

  • Do not ask for a full polished document before providing core context.
  • Do not skip reader testing for documents that guide decisions or implementation.
  • Do not rely on the assistant as the only reviewer for facts or approvals.

Frequently Asked Questions

What documents does this skill support?
It supports documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision records, RFCs, and similar structured documents.
Can it work with an existing template?
Yes. Provide the template or describe the required format before drafting begins.
Does it create files?
Yes, when file access is available. It can create a markdown scaffold and update sections during refinement.
Can it read Slack or Google Drive?
Only when approved integrations are available. Otherwise, paste the relevant context directly into the conversation.
Does it replace human review?
No. The document owner must verify facts, links, technical details, and final approval requirements.
Why use reader testing?
Reader testing finds unclear assumptions, missing context, and questions that real readers may ask.

Developer Details

License

MIT

Skillstore revision

r1

Version notice

The author did not declare a version.

Repository

https://github.com/AstraBit-CPT/astrabit-docs/tree/master/.claude/skills/doc-coauthoring

Ref

6eec4a59f63ff83440a84c18d1aef79743bc714e

Maintenance freshness

7/18/2026

Usage

10 downloads · 235 views

File structure

📄 SKILL.md