Skills quality-reviewer Audit History
📦

Audit History

quality-reviewer - 8 audits

Version comparison

Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.

VersionDateResultReview itemsChange vs previous
v8 LatestJul 5, 2026, 01:50 AM 1 confirmed0No capability change
v7 Jul 5, 2026, 01:50 AM 1 confirmed0 Filesystem accessNetwork access
v6 Jun 28, 2026, 10:15 AM 1 confirmed1Filesystem accessNetwork access
v5 Jan 16, 2026, 04:02 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v4 Jan 16, 2026, 04:02 PM No confirmed findings0External commands
v3 Jan 10, 2026, 10:22 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v2 Jan 10, 2026, 10:22 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v1 Jan 10, 2026, 10:22 AM No confirmed findings0Baseline

Jul 5, 2026, 01:50 AM

The static command-execution alerts are false positives from markdown fences, inline code, and a hardcoded read-only ls example. No malware, credential access, or data exfiltration intent was found, but the skill grants overbroad tool access through a wildcard permission.

1
Files scanned
158
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (1)

Medium
Overbroad Tool Permission
The skill declares allowed-tools: '*' for a workflow that includes filesystem inspection and web research. Broad permissions increase impact if instructions are misused.
The wildcard permission is explicit in the skill metadata, and the review workflow only needs a smaller set of read and research tools.
Audited by: codex

Jul 5, 2026, 01:50 AM

The static command-execution alerts are false positives from markdown fences, inline code, and a hardcoded read-only ls example. No malware, credential access, or data exfiltration intent was found, but the skill grants overbroad tool access through a wildcard permission.

1
Files scanned
158
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (1)

Medium
Overbroad Tool Permission
The skill declares allowed-tools: '*' for a workflow that includes filesystem inspection and web research. Broad permissions increase impact if instructions are misused.
The wildcard permission is explicit in the skill metadata, and the review workflow only needs a smaller set of read and research tools.
Audited by: codex

Jun 28, 2026, 10:15 AM

Static external-command and weak-cryptography alerts are mostly false positives from Markdown fences, inline code formatting, and words such as description. The skill is still medium risk because it grants wildcard tool access, asks the agent to inspect project files, and requires web research.

1
Files scanned
158
Lines analyzed
5
Review items
3
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (1)

Medium
Wildcard Tool Permission
The skill declares allowed-tools as '*' on line 4. This is not malicious by itself, but it gives the agent broad execution, filesystem, and network capability for a community skill.
The wildcard permission is explicit in the skill metadata. The risk depends on runtime safeguards and user trust, so it is medium rather than high.
Capability review items (1)

These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.

Medium
Project Inspection and Web Research Workflow
The workflow asks the agent to list project context files and search or fetch current documentation. This is legitimate for the skill purpose, but it can expose local project structure or send dependency information to external services.
The file inspection and web research instructions are clear. They support the skill goal, but users should understand the privacy and egress implications.
Static false positives ignored (3)

These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.

Low
False Positive: Markdown Backticks
Static analysis reported Ruby or shell backtick execution, but the cited locations are Markdown fences, inline file names, and output examples. No evidence found of executable Ruby backticks or command substitution.
The cited text is visible Markdown formatting rather than executable code. There is no Ruby file or shell interpolation context in the skill.
Low
False Positive: Weak Cryptography
Static analysis reported weak cryptography on lines 3 and 77. These lines contain descriptive text, not cryptographic algorithms, hash functions, ciphers, or security-sensitive operations.
The flagged lines do not contain crypto code or instructions to use weak crypto. This appears to be a keyword collision with ordinary prose.
Low
False Positive: System Reconnaissance
Static analysis reported system reconnaissance on line 119. That line asks whether library recommendations changed recently and does not request host, network, account, or system discovery.
The cited line is about library documentation changes. No system reconnaissance behavior is present at that location.

Risk Factors

⚙️ External commands (1)
📁 Filesystem access (1)
🌐 Network access (2)

Detected Patterns

Broad Tool Access
Audited by: codex

Jan 16, 2026, 04:02 PM

All 20 static findings are FALSE_POSITIVES. The scanner misclassified documentation syntax (markdown code blocks, backticks, URL fields) as executable code patterns. This is a pure prompt-based skill containing only markdown documentation. The 'ls' commands are example instructions, not executed code. No actual cryptographic algorithms, external commands, or network calls exist in this skill file.

2
Files scanned
334
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jan 16, 2026, 04:02 PM

All 20 static findings are FALSE_POSITIVES. The scanner misclassified documentation syntax (markdown code blocks, backticks, URL fields) as executable code patterns. This is a pure prompt-based skill containing only markdown documentation. The 'ls' commands are example instructions, not executed code. No actual cryptographic algorithms, external commands, or network calls exist in this skill file.

2
Files scanned
334
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jan 10, 2026, 10:22 AM

Prompt-based skill containing only markdown documentation for AI code review guidance. No executable code, scripts, or network calls. Operates as a system prompt instructing the AI to perform file reading and web research - appropriate for the stated purpose.

1
Files scanned
158
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude

Jan 10, 2026, 10:22 AM

Prompt-based skill containing only markdown documentation for AI code review guidance. No executable code, scripts, or network calls. Operates as a system prompt instructing the AI to perform file reading and web research - appropriate for the stated purpose.

1
Files scanned
158
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude

Jan 10, 2026, 10:22 AM

Prompt-based skill containing only markdown documentation for AI code review guidance. No executable code, scripts, or network calls. Operates as a system prompt instructing the AI to perform file reading and web research - appropriate for the stated purpose.

1
Files scanned
158
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude