์Šคํ‚ฌ quality-reviewer
๐Ÿ”

quality-reviewer

์•ˆ์ „ ๐ŸŒ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ์ ‘๊ทผ๐Ÿ“ ํŒŒ์ผ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์•ก์„ธ์Šคโš™๏ธ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ๋ช…๋ น์–ด

Review Code with Latest Ecosystem Research

๋˜ํ•œ ๋‹ค์Œ์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค: ArieGoldkin

Code reviews may miss outdated dependencies or deprecated patterns. This skill performs deep analysis with real-time web research to verify versions, check security vulnerabilities, and validate against current documentation.

์ง€์›: Claude Codex Code(CC)
๐Ÿ“Š 69 ์ ์ ˆํ•จ
1

์Šคํ‚ฌ ZIP ๋‹ค์šด๋กœ๋“œ

2

Claude์—์„œ ์—…๋กœ๋“œ

์„ค์ • โ†’ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ โ†’ ์Šคํ‚ฌ โ†’ ์Šคํ‚ฌ ์—…๋กœ๋“œ๋กœ ์ด๋™

3

ํ† ๊ธ€์„ ์ผœ๊ณ  ์‚ฌ์šฉ ์‹œ์ž‘

ํ…Œ์ŠคํŠธํ•ด ๋ณด๊ธฐ

"quality-reviewer" ์‚ฌ์šฉ ์ค‘์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Review our React component patterns and check if our dependencies are up to date

์˜ˆ์ƒ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:

  • โœ“ Correctness: Logic is sound, edge cases handled properly
  • โœ“ Anti-Bloat: Dependencies are minimal and necessary
  • โš ๏ธ Versions: React 18.2.0 detected, 19.1.0 is latest stable
  • โš ๏ธ Documentation: useEffect cleanup pattern differs from current React docs
  • Verdict: REQUEST CHANGES - Update React and fix useEffect pattern

"quality-reviewer" ์‚ฌ์šฉ ์ค‘์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. Check our Node.js and Express versions for security issues

์˜ˆ์ƒ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ:

  • โœ“ Security: No known CVEs in current Node.js 20.x version
  • โš ๏ธ Express: Version 4.18.2 detected, 4.19.0 addresses security patch
  • โœ“ Dependencies: All other packages are current
  • Verdict: APPROVE with NOTE - Update Express in next maintenance window

๋ณด์•ˆ ๊ฐ์‚ฌ

์•ˆ์ „
v5 โ€ข 1/16/2026

All 20 static findings are FALSE_POSITIVES. The scanner misclassified documentation syntax (markdown code blocks, backticks, URL fields) as executable code patterns. This is a pure prompt-based skill containing only markdown documentation. The 'ls' commands are example instructions, not executed code. No actual cryptographic algorithms, external commands, or network calls exist in this skill file.

2
์Šค์บ”๋œ ํŒŒ์ผ
334
๋ถ„์„๋œ ์ค„ ์ˆ˜
3
๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ ์‚ฌํ•ญ
5
์ด ๊ฐ์‚ฌ ์ˆ˜

์œ„ํ—˜ ์š”์ธ

๐ŸŒ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ์ ‘๊ทผ (1)
๐Ÿ“ ํŒŒ์ผ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์•ก์„ธ์Šค (1)
โš™๏ธ ์™ธ๋ถ€ ๋ช…๋ น์–ด (8)

ํ’ˆ์งˆ ์ ์ˆ˜

38
์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜
100
์œ ์ง€๋ณด์ˆ˜์„ฑ
85
์ฝ˜ํ…์ธ 
21
์ปค๋ฎค๋‹ˆํ‹ฐ
100
๋ณด์•ˆ
91
์‚ฌ์–‘ ์ค€์ˆ˜

๋งŒ๋“ค ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ

Security vulnerability check

Verify dependencies for known CVEs and security issues before merging code changes.

Standards compliance review

Ensure new code follows project patterns and uses current library best practices.

Dependency version audit

Check if dependencies are outdated and identify needed upgrades.

์ด ํ”„๋กฌํ”„ํŠธ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด ๋ณด์„ธ์š”

Quick version check
Check if our React and TypeScript versions are current. Search for latest stable releases.
Security audit
Review our dependencies for security issues. Search for known vulnerabilities in current versions.
Pattern verification
Verify our React patterns against the latest documentation. Flag any deprecated usage.
Full code review
Review the recent changes for correctness, elegance, and standards compliance. Check versions and documentation.

๋ชจ๋ฒ” ์‚ฌ๋ก€

  • Use when merging dependency updates or adding new libraries
  • Combine with automatic quality hooks for comprehensive coverage
  • Request web research explicitly with 'double check against latest' trigger

ํ”ผํ•˜๊ธฐ

  • Using for simple syntax reviews (automatic hook handles this faster)
  • Expecting code modifications (skill provides recommendations only)
  • Skipping project context files (reduces standards compliance accuracy)

์ž์ฃผ ๋ฌป๋Š” ์งˆ๋ฌธ

What platforms support this skill?
Works with Claude, Codex, and Claude Code. Requires web search capability.
How long does a review take?
Typically 2-3 minutes due to web research for version and documentation verification.
Does this modify my code?
No. The skill provides recommendations and findings but does not write or change files.
Is my code data safe?
Yes. This is a prompt-based skill with no external network calls or data exfiltration.
How is this different from automatic quality hooks?
Automatic hooks use existing knowledge for fast checks. This skill performs deep web research for current versions and documentation.
What triggers should I use?
Say 'double check against latest docs', 'verify versions', 'check security', or 'review against documentation'.

๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์ž ์„ธ๋ถ€ ์ •๋ณด

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž

ArcadeAI

๋ผ์ด์„ ์Šค

MIT

์ฐธ์กฐ

main

ํŒŒ์ผ ๊ตฌ์กฐ

๐Ÿ“„ SKILL.md