Versioned security assessment

Report ID: SA-20419DF7

6/28/2026, 8:28:28 AM

app-store-optimization security assessment v4

Skill Security Certification Report

Audit History
Audit model: codex Historical report
Skill name
app-store-optimization
Version
v4
Maintainer
alirezarezvani
Source
github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tree/main/marketing-skill/app-store-optimization
Coverage
13 Files scanned · 6,076 Lines analyzed
Policy version
Unavailable

Confirmed finding summary

No confirmed security findings

The completed audit recorded no confirmed security findings. This is not proof that the Skill has no side effects.

Installation context

Historical evidence

This report may not describe the currently installable artifact. Open the current Skill page for install guidance.

Open current Skill page

This report does not block or authorize the manifest or ZIP.

Static analysis reported 431 potential issues, but review found no confirmed malicious behavior. The weak cryptography alerts are false positives caused by ASO terminology and dictionary access patterns, the external command alerts are Markdown code fences and inline code, and the filesystem/network alerts are documentation paths or ordinary review-analysis text. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential access, subprocess execution, file manipulation, or outbound network calls.

Report position

Historical report

Open audit history before using this report to install.

Audit attestation

Not attestable

The required immutable binding is incomplete.

Human verification

Not verified

No human verification is recorded for this report.

Coverage

13 Files scanned · 6,076 Lines analyzed

0 items shown for review

Limitations

This report does not claim runtime or sandbox execution and does not prove the absence of side effects.

Evidence chain

Follow the evidence from source binding to the install contract. Available evidence supports verification; it is not a safety guarantee.

  1. Source

    Binding unavailable

  2. Artifact

    Identity incomplete

  3. Audit

    Complete

  4. Install contract

    Open manifest to verify

    Open manifest

Capabilities observed

Observed means this report recorded supporting evidence. Not recorded does not prove that a capability is absent.

Contains scripts

May execute code included with the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Network access

May connect to external services.

Observed in 4 evidence locations

Filesystem access

May read or write local files.

Observed in 3 evidence locations

Env variables

May read values from the process environment.

Not recorded by this audit

External commands

May invoke commands or programs outside the Skill.

Observed in 3 evidence locations

Risk findings

Confirmed security concerns are separated from items that still need review.

No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.

Expert evidence

Immutable subject identity, scanner metadata, dismissed matches, and source-level evidence.

Artifact subject

Marketplace commit
Unavailable
Content hash
Unavailable
Tree hash
Unavailable
Skill path
Unavailable
Audit payload hash
Unavailable

Analysis metadata

Audit model: codex

Analysis state: Complete

Scope is limited to the recorded files, lines, methods, and evidence. No runtime or sandbox execution is claimed.

Static false positives ignored (4)
Low
ab_test_planner.py:18aso_scorer.py:10competitor_analyzer.py:34metadata_optimizer.py:19SKILL.md:21
False Positive: Weak Cryptographic Algorithm Alerts
Verdict: FALSE_POSITIVE. The flagged files use ASO scoring terms, dictionaries, thresholds, and marketing calculations. No evidence found of MD5, SHA1, encryption, password hashing, token handling, or other cryptographic operations.
Review found only ASO domain logic and standard data structures at representative flagged locations. A targeted search found no cryptographic APIs or secret-handling code.
Low
HOW_TO_USE.md:10-12README.md:97-101SKILL.md:73-81
False Positive: Markdown Backtick Execution Alerts
Verdict: FALSE_POSITIVE. The flagged backticks are Markdown fences and inline code examples for prompts, JSON samples, and function names. They are documentation text and are not executed by the skill.
The locations are Markdown documentation blocks or inline code references. No shell, Ruby, subprocess, or dynamic command invocation was found in implementation files.
Low
README.md:181README.md:189README.md:204
False Positive: Hidden Filesystem Path Documentation
Verdict: FALSE_POSITIVE. The hidden path references document standard Claude skill installation and verification paths. The Python modules do not read from or write to these paths.
The flagged lines are install and verification examples in documentation. A code search found no file access APIs in the Python modules.
Low
review_analyzer.py:3review_analyzer.py:270review_analyzer.py:596review_analyzer.py:637
False Positive: Network Request Terminology
Verdict: FALSE_POSITIVE. The network alerts are caused by the English word 'requests' in review-analysis feature names and comments. No evidence found of HTTP libraries, sockets, fetch calls, webhooks, or outbound data transfer.
The implementation imports only typing, collections, and re for review text processing. The flagged occurrences refer to feature requests, not network requests.

Verify and export

JSON report CITATION.cff SARIF 2.1.0 Signed installation manifest

The manifest and lockfile bind install artifacts to cryptographic hashes. This integrity claim is separate from the security assessment.

Audit attestation: not_attestable